View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Forward this email to a friend ([link removed])
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

Photo by Annabelle Gordon/Reuters

It’s Tuesday, the traditional day for elections and for our pause-and-consider newsletter on politics and policy. We think of it as a mini-magazine in your inbox.

6 QUESTIONS ABOUT TRUMP’S BIG LAW
By Lisa Desjardins, @LisaDNews ([link removed])
Correspondent

Once again, you have impressed us.

Earlier this month, we asked you for your questions about President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful” bill (OBBBA) — or anything else about what lies ahead for Congress. You responded not just with volume, but with depth and smarts.

A quick update on what’s ahead for Congress: nothing. The House of Representatives has cancelled most of its plans for the week, as they face sharp divisions ([link removed]) over how and when to vote on releasing documents from the Epstein investigation. We’ll be covering that more on the show Tuesday night.

More robustly, below are answers to some of your questions, but we think the questions also say something about how to see the rapid-fire history underway.

1. Where are the details of the big bill?

Don S., among others, asked: "Will the President and Congress provide the citizens with a [plain] language, bullet point summary of the bill?"

Great question!

For the final text of a piece of legislation, I go to Congress itself. Click on this link ([link removed]) for the OBBBA, also known as HR 1. You can read the text in the large box below, or you can download it as a searchable PDF. (You can also use the drop down menu to check previous versions.)

Unfortunately, there is no single bullet-point summary from the White House or Congress. Nor an index. This speaks to how quickly the legislation came together to meet the July 4 deadline. But the Senate Budget Committee posted links to summaries ([link removed]) of many key sections of the bill as it was nearly final.

2. How does Trump’s big bill fit into the appropriations process?

Eric H. asked: "How does [the 'big, beautiful' bill] relate to the Appropriations process? It would appear that this 'bill' is a list of desires, and not binding."

I understand the question here. The OBBBA is a massive law ([link removed]) , full of both policy changes and direct spending that is most usually in appropriations bills. But Congress has many ways of spending. And everything in the OBBBA is, in fact, binding.

3. When will the big bill’s provisions go into effect?

Nicola N., among others, asked: "The media is not clarifying what takes effect when. I am not worried about a law that doesn't take effect until 2027 or 2028. I want to know what takes effect immediately or in 2026."

I hear your need for information. Let me get it to you.

The vast majority of the tax cuts in this bill ([link removed]) are in fact permanent. And take effect immediately, affecting the 2025 tax year. That includes nearly all of the extensions of the Trump 2017 tax cuts, keeping the current individual tax rates in place. Some business tax cuts, like allowing 100% deductions for business expenses, are also permanent.

However, some significant tax cuts that start immediately will expire after the 2028 election: no tax on tips and overtime pay, and the increased deduction for seniors.

Also starting with some lag time: Significant reforms of Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (previously known as food stamps). Most don’t start until after the 2026 election. For example: Starting in 2027, states must take on more of the costs of SNAP and by then they must implement new Medicaid cuts.

We did a segment on this, ([link removed]) visualizing the important timing of the law.

4. What can Democrats do?

One reader, among others, asked: "What aspects of the new Trump Bill can be overturned by a future Democratic congress and/or president?"

This is really more of a political question than a process one. In theory, any future Congress or president could overturn or rewrite any piece of the law.

They would need a majority in the House and at least a majority in the Senate.

But a tougher question is: Which items would Democrats most easily be able to overturn if they regained power? I’m guessing that would include the cuts to green energy cuts at the top of their list.

5. Who is most affected by these cuts?

Amy R. asked: "What I really want to know is how the people who will be affected most adversely are reacting and what is their understanding of the bill?"

The most honest answer is that few people will be affected adversely right away by OBBBA itself.

States do have the right to increase work requirements on SNAP immediately if they choose.

But otherwise, the law’s effects are staggered and will not change the bottom lines for many individuals in a noticeable way for years. There are some hospitals and other health care groups starting to assess their needs. At least one, in Nebraska ([link removed]) , has closed a clinic in anticipation of a multipronged financial crunch ahead.

But once Medicaid and SNAP spending cuts are in full swing, the groups most affected are likely unmarried, and also either at the start of their work life, looking for jobs, or well into their careers, in their 50s. The law increases work requirements ([link removed]) to include people up to age 64.

Several studies ([link removed]) have found ([link removed]) that low-income Americans will lose from the bill, while wealthy Americans will gain.

Finally: The green energy industry faces a potential dire situation, though not immediately as a direct result of the OBBBA. The final version gave solar and wind tax credits a 12-month window before facing cuts, thanks in part to efforts by Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

While that puts off some effects from the bill, the Trump administration announced it aims to cut those tax credits anyway by executive action. (Murkowski has said ([link removed]) she feels cheated.)

6. Were any provisions dropped?

Karen G. asked: "Did the bill include the original provision for the sale of millions of acres of public lands?"

No. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, removed that proposal ([link removed]) after facing some Republican disagreement over it and, moreover, an initial block by the Senate parliamentarian.

A final thought
[link removed]
Watch the clip in the player above.
We also received several questions about how the rescissions package would affect PBS, including us here at PBS News.

We’re as determined as ever to report the news, even when it affects us directly. On this, our co-anchors delivered a brief message on-air last night: PBS News is not going anywhere. ([link removed])

One way to help us: Let’s grow our community. Please forward this email to family and friends, and encourage them to subscribe to Here’s the Deal. ([link removed])

Consider this a Part 1, everyone. We have a lot more of your questions to tackle ahead. We’re grateful to you and your support.
More on politics from our coverage:
* Watch: What is publicly known about Trump’s yearslong relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. ([link removed])
* One Big Question: Six months into his second term, what does Trump view as his signature achievements so far? NPR’s Tamara Keith and Amy Walter of the Cook Political Report with Amy Walter discuss. ([link removed])
* A Closer Look: After the fall of Roe, anti-abortion activists take aim at birth control. ([link removed])
* Perspectives: Beto O’Rourke, the former Democratic congressman from El Paso, says “we have to fight back” ([link removed]) as Trump pushes Texas to redraw congressional maps.

WHAT TRUMP’S NEW STUDENT LOAN RULES MEAN FOR BORROWERS
[link removed]
Watch the segment in the player above.
By Karina E. Cuevas
Producer, National Affairs

Sweeping changes to the federal student loan system are underway, part of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill.

Nearly half a million borrowers could see their payments spike ([link removed]) after the Department of Education scrapped most existing repayment plans.

The law also imposes new lifetime borrowing caps:
* $100,000 for graduate students
* $200,000 for those pursuing professional degrees like law or medicine
* $65,000 per child for parent borrowers.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has been exploring how to close the Education Department ([link removed]) , a decision that would change how all these new changes to loan programs are administered.

For a breakdown of what this means ([link removed]) for borrowers, PBS News’ Geoff Bennett spoke with NPR’s education correspondent Cory Turner.
More on student loans:
* Watch: How aspiring Black doctors see Trump's new loan cap. ([link removed])
* Delinquency and Default: What to know if you've fallen behind on student loan payments. ([link removed])
* What Does the Education Department Do? A guide to the agency ([link removed]) Trump wants to gut, courtesy of the Associated Press.

THIS WEEK’S TRIVIA QUESTION

[link removed]

An 1890 panorama map of Pikes Peak. Image courtesy of Library of Congress' Geography and Map Division ([link removed])

By Joshua Barajas
Senior Editor, Digital

O beautiful for trivia’s prize!

Inspired by her 1893 trip to Pikes Peak, a tall mountain in the Rockies, Katharine Lee Bates wrote this poem that later became one of the United States’ most enduring patriotic songs.

Our question: Which American patriotic song evolved from Bates’ poem?

Send your answers to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) or tweet using #PoliticsTrivia. The first correct answers will earn a shoutout next week.

Last week, we asked: Which amendment of the U.S. Constitution has the Supreme Court pointed to when ruling that U.S.-born citizens can only lose their citizenship if they relinquish it?

The answer: 14th Amendment. ([link removed]) The Trump administration seeks to end birthright citizenship, a constitutional right that was added to the U.S. Constitution more than 150 years ago to protect freed slaves after the Civil War. The U.S. joins at least 30 other countries that grant automatic citizenship to any child born within their borders.

Congratulations to our winners: Brenda Radford and Dave Pasley!

Thank you all for reading and watching. We’ll drop into your inbox next week.
PBS News depends on the support of individuals who believe in the importance of independent, balanced and in-depth reporting on the most important domestic and international issues of the day. Please consider making a tax-deductible contribution ([link removed]) to ensure our vital reporting continues to thrive. Thank you.

Support PBS News Hour journalism ([link removed])
Want more news and analysis in your inbox?
Explore all of the PBS News' e ([link removed]) mails. ([link removed])
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2025 WETA, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
3939 Campbell Ave.
Arlington, VA 22206

** Update my email preferences ([link removed])

** Unsubscribe from all PBS News emails ([link removed])