Yesterday, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the constitutionality of Michigan’s anti-terrorism threat law
Share or view as webpage [ [link removed] ] | Unsubscribe [ [link removed] ]
Michigan Department of Attorney General Press Release banner [ [link removed] ]
*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:*
July 22, 2025
*Media Contact:*
Danny Wimmer <
[email protected]>
Michigan Court of Appeals Upholds Constitutionality of State Anti-Terrorism Threat Law
*LANSING *– Yesterday, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the constitutionality of Michigan’s anti-terrorism threat law (PDF) [ [link removed] ], announced Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel. The ruling follows a directive by the Michigan Supreme Court, which earlier this year vacated the Court of Appeals’ March decision [ [link removed] ] that had declared the statute unconstitutional. The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration.
“This decision marks a critical victory for public safety,” Nessel said. “It makes clear that those who seek to spread fear and destabilize our communities through threats of terrorism can be held accountable. Our anti-terrorism threat law is a vital tool for my office and county prosecutors across the state, and this ruling ensures we can continue using it to uphold the law and protect the people of Michigan.”
The statute, enacted in 2002, criminalizes threats and false threats of terrorism. In its March decision, the Court of Appeals ruled that the statute is unconstitutional because it does not require proof that the defendant subjectively understood the threatening nature of the statements or acted recklessly when making them. Attorney General Nessel then filed an amicus brief [ [link removed] ] at the Michigan Supreme Court in support of the emergency application filed by the Wayne County Prosecutor to preserve the law.
Attorney General Nessel argued to the Michigan Supreme Court in her amicus brief that the Court of Appeals’ decision was clearly erroneous, as prosecutors are already required through the statute to prove charged defendants intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or sought to influence or affect government conduct through intimidation or coercion. In March, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated the Court of Appeals’ judgment, keeping the judgment from affecting current criminal cases, and remanded the case to that Court for further consideration.
The ruling by the Court of Appeals affirms the statute’s constitutionality and clarifies the standard of proof, requiring the prosecution to demonstrate that the defendant recklessly made a threat, the threat involved an act of terrorism, and the threat was communicated to another person.
###
AG logo [ [link removed] ]
*Media Inquiries* <
[email protected]>
*Latest Releases* [ [link removed] ]
*File a Complaint* [ [link removed] ]
Connect with us:
facebook icon [ [link removed] ] x icon [ [link removed] ] youtube icon [ [link removed] ] instagram icon [ [link removed] ] linkedin icon [ [link removed] ] govdelivery icon <
[email protected]> threads icon [ [link removed] ]
If you wish to no longer receive emails from us,
please update your preferences here:
Manage Preferences [ [link removed] ] | Delete Profile [ [link removed] ]
Need further assistance?
Contact Us | Help [ [link removed] ]
________________________________________________________________________
Get personalized voter information on early voting and other topics at Michigan.gov/Vote [ [link removed] ].
________________________________________________________________________
This email was sent to
[email protected] using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Michigan Attorney General · G. Mennen Williams Building, 7th Floor · 525 W. Ottawa St., P.O. Box 30212 · Lansing, MI 48909 · 517-373-1100
body .abe-column-block { min-height: 5px; } table.gd_combo_table img {margin-left:10px; margin-right:10px;} table.gd_combo_table div.govd_image_display img, table.gd_combo_table td.gd_combo_image_cell img {margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px;} table.govd_hr {min-width: 100%;} p, li, h1, h2, h3 { overflow-wrap: normal; word-wrap: normal; word-break: keep-all; -moz-hyphens: none; -ms-hyphens: none; -webkit-hyphens: none; hyphens: none; mso-hyphenate: none; }