Brooklyn Marine Terminal Vision Plan Vote Postponed, Again
The Brooklyn Marine Terminal Task Force was scheduled to vote on the proposed Vision Plan last Thursday, July 17—but the vote was once again postponed. Had the vote taken place, I would have voted no.
The vote is now rescheduled for Thursday, July 24, and my position remains unchanged. I will vote no, while remaining fully committed to negotiating a plan that meaningfully addresses the longstanding issues facing the neighborhoods impacted—especially the Columbia Waterfront, which I represent.
Just this month, after sustained community advocacy, the City finally announced the upcoming closure of the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Concrete Recycling Facility—an urgent demand from Columbia Waterfront residents since February 2024. Chronic dust, poor air quality, disruptive construction noise, and a lack of government responsiveness have severely eroded community trust in the BMT process.
The BMT Vision Plan aims to modernize the port and repair the pier, funded in part by market-rate housing. Our collective advocacy has already secured a commitment that 40% of the 6,000 new housing units—2,400 units—will be permanently below market-rate. But as a legislator who strongly supports building more housing across the city, I believe we cannot move forward with such an ambitious proposal in an environmental justice community and transit desert without significantly more planning, transparency, and engagement.
I’m eager to get to a yes—and I believe we can get there. But key concerns must be addressed first, including securing the following:
Robust transportation and climate resiliency planning;
Strong displacement protections, especially as construction will span the next decade and beyond; and
A real commitment to preserving Brooklyn’s last large-scale industrial waterfront, including safeguarding and expanding maritime and industrial jobs.
I urge EDC and the Task Force to take the summer to meaningfully revise this plan and bring it to a vote in the fall. Rushing to meet arbitrary deadlines has only deepened community mistrust. Our neighborhoods deserve a plan rooted in their needs and vision for a more just and sustainable future—and our city deserves a Harbor of the Future that’s truly built to last.