[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fnew-from-the-center-for-immigration-studies-71425 Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fnew-from-the-center-for-immigration-studies-71425)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
Report
Pick a Side: Prohibit dual citizens from access to classified information ([link removed])
By Nick Pietrowicz, July 8, 2025
Summary: Throughout most of American history, dual citizenship was viewed as a danger to our country. Accordingly, the federal government in the past worked to restrict the practice. But today, while not expressly encouraged, Americans are not in any manner prevented from acquiring or maintaining dual citizenship.
Parsing Immigration Policy Podcast
Visa Integrity: The Next Frontier in Immigration Enforcement ([link removed])
Host: Mark Krikorian
Guest: Jessica Vaughan, Director of Policy Studies at CIS
Episode 212

Marriage Fraud: The Hidden Gateway to U.S. Entry ([link removed])
Host: Marguerite Telford, Director of Communications at CIS
Guest: Richard Lee, former USCIS Immigration Officer and author
Episode 211
Featured Posts
DOJ Concludes Illegal Entrants Can Be Prosecuted Anywhere in the U.S. ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: Politicos in sanctuary jurisdictions may be happy giving ICE the brush-off, but few will tell their cops to ignore a summons issued by an Article III judge — particularly given that Article III judges have contempt powers.

Subsidizing Remittances Through Welfare ([link removed])
By Jason Richwine
Excerpt: There is almost certainly a substantial overlap between immigrant-headed households sending remittances and those receiving welfare. The overlap indicates that U.S. taxpayer money has been converted into a form of foreign aid, contrary to its intended purpose of easing poverty in our own country. A remittance tax can help recover some of those lost funds.
Supersize the Entry Ban ([link removed])
By George Fishman
Excerpt: According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, nationals of 31 countries have higher estimated B visa overstay rates than do at least one of the countries subjected to the 2025 entry ban in part because of their nationals’ overstay rates, as do nationals of 67 countries with regard to F/M/J visa overstay rates. I would urge President Trump to consider further entry bans for nationals of these countries with even higher overstay rates (often extraordinarily high) than some of the countries sanctioned in his 2025 proclamation.

District Court Judge Tries to Block Trump Border Proclamation ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt:This decision boils down to a belief that asylum and related protections are so overpowering that they trump any executive-branch action to keep aliens from crossing the border illegally that doesn’t include a chance to apply for those protections. Whether reviewing courts will agree with that belief is the question.
More Blog Posts
* No — CASA v. Trump Isn’t a ‘Return to the Constitutional Horrors of Dred Scott’ ([link removed])
* SCOTUS ‘Benchslaps’ Recalcitrant Federal District Court Judge ([link removed])
* Attacks on DHS Facilities Underscore Risks of Anti-ICE Rhetoric ([link removed])
* Is It Time to Create a Homeland Security Reserve Corps? ([link removed])
* Flashback: Schumer’s 1986 ‘Agricultural Worker’ Scheme Was Rotten to the Core ([link removed])
* President Trump Risks Falling into the Amnesty Trap ([link removed])
* Unmasking ICE — or Throwing Agents to the Wolves? ([link removed])

Donate ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2025 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])