View in browser | Support our newsroom
SUPPORT OUR NEXT BIG INVESTIGATION

THE WEEKLY REVEAL

Saturday, July 12, 2025

Is AI Pushing Us Closer to Nuclear Disaster?

The white cap of a mushroom cloud billows outward from deep darkness in the upper sky. There are bright, fiery oranges and yellows closer to the horizon.
Hi, I’m Kara McGuirk-Allison, editor with More To The Story.

I don’t remember exactly where I first heard about the Doomsday Clock. But I’m pretty sure it was either from Doctor Who or Watchmen. The clock has been a symbolic plot device foreshadowing our own destruction of humankind since its creation in 1947. But the clock, and everything it stands for, is very real.

More recently, maybe you saw the movie Oppenheimer. Well, creating the atomic bomb scared those scientists right out of their lab coats. So the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists created the Doomsday Clock and set it to 7 minutes before midnight. And to give you some context, earlier this year, its experts moved the clock’s hands to 89 seconds before midnight, the closest they’ve ever been to pointing at imminent destruction.

Our guest on this week’s More To The Story is Daniel Holz: professor of physics, researcher of black holes, and chair of the decision-making group that turns those metaphoric hands of doom. And while threats like nuclear weapons, AI, disinformation, and climate change all affected the decision to shift the clock’s hands, Daniel says the clock is actually a symbol of hope that citizens of the world will acknowledge our circumstances and do the right things to turn those hands back—together.

Find this episode wherever you listen to Reveal, and don’t forget to subscribe:

We Regret to Inform You

Mourners stand near a memorial for 34-year-old Brandon Lopez on Santa Ana Boulevard during a vigil in Santa Ana, California, in 2021. Anaheim police fatally shot Lopez after an hourslong standoff.
Credit: Leonard Ortiz/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images
Listen to the episode
Bruce Praet is a well-known name in law enforcement, especially in California. He co-founded a company called Lexipol that contracts with more than 95 percent of police departments in the state and offers its clients trainings and ready-made policies.

In one of Praet’s online training webinars, he offers a piece of advice that policing experts have called inhumane. It’s aimed at protecting officers and their departments from lawsuits.

After police kill someone, they are supposed to notify the family. Instead of delivering the news of the death immediately, Praet advises officers to first ask about the person who was killed to get as much unflattering information as possible.

Reporter Brian Howey started looking into this advice when he was with the Investigative Reporting Program at UC Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism. This week on Reveal, in an update of an episode that first aired in 2023, he delves into his finding that officers have been using this tactic across California. Howey also finds that the information families disclosed before they knew their relative was killed later affected their lawsuits against law enforcement departments.
Button that says, Listen on Apple Podcasts
🎧 Other places to listen: SpotifyiHeartRadioPandora, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Advertisement

Attacks on Public Media...and How You Can Help

We need your help to fight back against attacks on public radio.

A bill in the Senate right now calls for taking back $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a crucial funder of many of the public radio stations that air our weekly show. You can help us fight back in a few ways:

1. Donate to Reveal today.

2. Call your elected officials and share why public broadcasting is important to you.

3. Donate to your local public radio station


We can’t do this work without people like you supporting us. Thank you! 

In Case You Missed It

🎧 Jeffrey Goldberg on Signalgate, Pete Hegseth, and the Risk of WWIII


The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief discusses what he learned about the Trump administration from “Signalgate” and what really scares him about the future of American democracy.
A colorful illustration of an African American man behind a studio microphone, with bright, painterly strokes in blue, purple, green, red, orange, and black. The man wears tightly coiled braids in a bun and has a neatly groomed beard and mustache. He’s also wearing round-framed glasses.

🎧 A Decade of Reveal

We celebrate our 10-year anniversary with a look back at some of our favorite stories and interviews with the journalists behind the reporting to explain what happened after the stories aired.

 A portrait of Mohsen Mahdawi from the shoulders up. He has short, curly black hair and thin-rimmed glasses. Seated in a plush chair, he looks up at an angle with a pensive expression.

🎧 Mohsen Mahdawi Fought ICE and Won His Freedom. For Now.


Columbia University student activist Mohsen Mahdawi discusses being arrested at his US citizenship hearing—and how he convinced a judge to release him.
An illustration of newborns, each swaddled in a white blanket, asleep in a grid of cribs that extends as far as the eye can see. The illustration uses soft shades of blue, pink, and brown.

🎧 Elon Musk and JD Vance Want You to Breed. A Lot.


A growing movement wants people to have more babies. The goal is not just more humans, but better ones.
Advertisement
This issue of The Weekly Reveal was written by Arianna Coghill and copy edited by Nikki Frick. If you enjoyed this issue, forward it to a friend. Have some thoughts? Drop us a line with feedback or ideas!
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Donate
Copyright © 2025 The Center for Investigative Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for The Weekly Reveal newsletter.

Our mailing address is:
The Center for Investigative Reporting
PO Box 584
San Francisco, CA 94104

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from all Reveal emails.