|
As the LaRouche Organization and the Schiller Institute mobilize
internationally with the leaflet “Will There Be Thermonuclear
Fireworks By the Fourth of July?” It becomes clearer, with each
passing day, that the July 13-21 “preventive war” actions taken
against Iran are proving to have produced the opposite effect to what
was said to have been intended. Instead of fracturing the Iran
government, for the purposes of what some fanatics called “regime
change,” the attacks have instead caused the people to rally around
it. Instead of destroying the Iranian nuclear program, the attacks
have probably produced a commitment by Iran to procure a nuclear
weapon. Instead of full inspection availability, the International
Atomic Energy Agency is now thrown out of Iran, probably
permanently.
But were either of those objectives—“regime change,” which is a
fancy way of saying, “overthrow the government;” or destroying the
Iranian nuclear weapons program (which was shown by American
intelligence to have not been actively pursuing the building or
deploying of a weapon at this time)—the actual objectives? Was the
intent, perhaps, to create in the popular mind a cover story for the
“regrettably necessary” deployment of a tactical nuclear weapon by
Israel against an Iran “that is now even more dangerous than before?”
Is the purpose to normalize the discussion about, leading to the
insane attempt at “limited nuclear war?”
It is a fact, little remembered today, that the Shah of Iran,
originally installed by Great Britain and the United States as the
head of state in Iran in 1953 after the Anglo-American “CIA ”overthrew
the democratically elected Mossadegh government, was then himself
overthrown—not by Islamic militants, as is claimed, but by London and
Washington! Under Anglo-American pressure, The non-Islamic radical
government of Shapour Bakhtiar was appointed by The Shah himself in
December of 1978; he then left the country in January 1979. Why was he
overthrown? The Shah wanted to build 20 nuclear power plants in 20
years, 8 of them to be built by the United States. He was insisting on
transitioning from oil to nuclear power for energy generation. He
threatened the entire “petrodollar” speculation in oil that began in
1973. Therefore he had to go, and he did.
Will British intelligence, or the renegade factions in the bowels
of the Pentagon that planned attacks on seven nations in five years
right after September 11, 2001, including Iran, use this as an
opportunity to pursue a nuclear chicken game with Russia and China?
London Telegraph columnist Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, in a June 23
article, “Putin Will Be Quaking in His Boots Today. Iran-Israel Has
Shown He Is Vulnerable,” wrote: “Operation Midnight Hammer, an
incredible demonstration of U.S. military power—and Israeli operations
before it—have made plain the fragility of Russian air defense
systems.” It was only June 1 that NATO, code-named “Ukraine,” struck
at Russia’s nuclear-capable plane capacity. Are we about to see
another attempt, in Ukraine, Israel, or both, to move one more step
into toward thermonuclear Hell?
Join us tonight to find out the latest, and to find out what you
can do to assist in our leaflet distribution and awareness campaign to
take back the Presidency from the disastrous course it is now
on—before, in the short term, the whole situation “goes nuclear.”
Speakers: Mike Billington, Carl Osgood
|
