Hi John,
Rachel Reeves spending review yesterday was a welcome departure from Tory austerity.
The Labour Chancellor’s first year in office has so far been largely defined by cuts to Winter Fuel Payments and upcoming cuts to PIP, but what was included in Reeves’ plans for the rest of the Parliament? And how could a closer relationship with Europe help her mission?
1) Homes under the hammer
One of Reeves’ headline acts was to commit £39 billion towards social housing over the next decade.
Naomi Smith, Best for Britain CEO responded to the spending review by calling for the removal of the technical barriers to trade which “artificially increase the cost of equipment” <[link removed]>. Further alignment with the EU on environmental standards would also lower the cost of construction materials, meaning that the government’s investment into the sector could go further and faster.
The youth mobility experience promised at the recent UK-EU Summit could also help the UK’s construction sector address its shortage of builders. The Home Builders Federation <[link removed]> has criticised Brexit for creating skills shortages, warning in December that the UK needed tens of thousands of new recruits to meet Labour's housing targets.
2) NH-Yes
Another one of Labour’s key manifesto commitments was to mend the NHS after 14 years of Tory neglect. The Chancellor announced a 2.8% annual real terms increase for the Department of Health and Social Care budget over the next three years.
To give the NHS the best possible chance to hit waiting list targets, the government should work alongside the EU to undo some of the damage caused by Brexit. At a time when the UK is struggling with a shortage of medical professionals, research by the Nuffield Trust shows that there are 4,000 fewer EU doctors <[link removed]> working in the NHS than there would otherwise have been without Brexit. More damning still, almost 2,000 companies <[link removed]> reported medicine shortages in 2024 alone, driven by “a reduction in EU imports”.
By easing the technical trade barriers at the border, pharmaceutical goods could cross the channel more freely, cutting costs and improving reliability. Not to mention the extra tax revenue <[link removed]> generated for public services if we realised the +2.2% GDP growth that could be generated by our Common Sense Deal with Europe <[link removed]>.
3) Money for munitions
With the spectre of Russian expansionism and American isolationism hanging over Europe, it was no surprise to see Defence Secretary John Healy emerge as a big winner on Wednesday. The Ministry of Defence will see an £11 billion increase in spending <[link removed]>, focused on increasing capital spending.
Like any manufacturing sector, defence production relies on complex trans-national supply chains and benefits from smooth trade across borders. By pursuing deep alignment in goods and services with the EU, the UK government could reduce these technical barriers to trade, easing friction and cutting costly red tape <[link removed]> for the UK’s manufacturing sector.
4) Education, education, education
When Labour entered office last year, the education system was in disarray. Crumbling class rooms, chronic underfunding and swollen class sizes are still limiting the potential of British children.
In an attempt to change that, the Chancellor has confirmed that the government is planning to invest £4.7 billion <[link removed]> to fix crumbling classes and rebuild dilapidated schools. Further, Reeves announced that free school meals will be extended to half a million extra kids, lifting around 100,000 children out of poverty <[link removed]> according to the Department of Education.
A closer relationship with Europe could help the Chancellor by giving young Brits the opportunity to pursue training or work in the EU currently unavailable to them. And the government should agree to the mutual recognition of professional qualifications with the EU so that those who have benefited from the Chancellors investment in tertiary education can work across the continent with ease <[link removed].>.
5) Devolution’s evolution
In an attempt to address growing regional inequality between the four nations of the United Kingdom, Reeves announced record investment into Scotland <[link removed]> (£52 billion), Northern Ireland <[link removed]> (£20 billion) and Wales <[link removed]> (£23 billion).
However, independent research carried out by Frontier Economics <[link removed]> on behalf of Best for Britain suggests that one of the best ways to undo regional inequality across the UK is to pursue deeper beneficial alignment with the EU on goods and services. The research suggests that the Midlands and Yorkshire would benefit most, while the shielding effect of deep alignment with the EU from American tariffs is particularly pronounced in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland <[link removed]>.
<[link removed]>Read the full blog <[link removed]>The provisions of the spending review are an important step forward, and away from austerity. But to truly unlock Britain's potential and renew the nation, the government must pursue the more ambitious relationship with the EU that voters want <[link removed]>.
Yours,
Cal
Cal Roscow
Director of Campaigns, Best for Britain
Will you help us fund more adverts like this? The more money we raise, the more people in key Ministers' constituencies we can reach. And that means more letters, and more pressure! (We'll also still be doing all the usual social media and in-person campaign activity!) Donate £3 <[link removed]>
Want to see our polling and research before anyone else? Regular supporters are alway first to get updates. And if you donate £10 we'll plant a 🌱 tree in your name.
<[link removed]>Become a regular supporter from £3/month <[link removed]>
This email was sent to
[email protected]
You're receiving this email because you opted in on [link removed] <[link removed]>.
Contact Us <mailto:
[email protected]> | Privacy Policy <[link removed]> | Unsubscribe <[link removed]>
Copyright © 2024 Best for Britain, All rights reserved. Published & promoted by Cary Mitchell on behalf of Best for Britain, the campaign name of BEST FOR BRITAIN LIMITED registered at International House, 36-38 Cornhill, London EC3V 3NG
Best for Britain Limited is a company registered in England and Wales no. 10436078. Registered for VAT no. 378894125.
Created with NationBuilder <[link removed]>. Build the Future.