|
Judicial Watch announced a $4.975 million settlement in the
wrongful death lawsuit against the U.S. Government filed on behalf of the
family of Ashli Babbitt, the U.S. Air Force veteran who was shot and killed
inside the U.S. Capitol by then-Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd on January
6, 2021. Ashli Babbitt was the only January 6 homicide victim.
|
Because no one is above
the law! |
Jun 10, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
 |
RIGHTS
AND FREEDOMS IN PERIL
"When it comes to fighting
for the American people’s ‘right to know,’ no one holds a candle to
Tom Fitton and his team at Judicial Watch" - Sean
Hannity
Tom Fitton returns with an exhaustive investigation into the progressive
movement’s efforts to dismantle the venerable institutions of American
rights and freedoms.
Order Tom Fitton's
Must-Read Today!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Today's Top Stories
|
|
|
|
Judicial Watch: Supreme Court Will Hear Judicial Watch
Case on Election Law Challenge
“It is an injustice that the
courts would deny a federal candidate the ability to challenge an election
provision that could lead to illegal votes being cast and counted for two
weeks AFTER Election Day,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“The Supreme Court’s decision to hear this case is a critical
opportunity to uphold federal law, protect voter rights, and ensure
election integrity. Illinois’ 14-day extension of Election Day thwarts
federal law, violates the civil rights of voters, and invites fraud.”
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Supreme
Court to Hear Congressman’s Challenge to State Ballot-Counting Law
The Epoch Times
Judicial
Watch, the group that brought the appeal on behalf of the petitioners,
hailed the Supreme Court’s decision to accept the case.
“It is an injustice that the courts would deny a federal candidate the
ability to challenge an election provision that could lead to illegal votes
being cast and counted for two weeks after Election Day,” Judicial Watch
President Tom Fitton told The Epoch Times.
READ MORE
|
Supreme
Court to consider reviving GOP challenge to Illinois mail ballot
deadline
The Hill
In their
petition to the high court, Bost and the two electors said the decision
disrupts a long line of cases enabling federal political candidates to
challenge election regulations.
“In the aftermath of the 2020 elections, however, for a variety of
reasons, courts have limited candidates’ ability to challenge the
electoral rules governing their campaigns. This case presents the
latest—and an extreme—example of this trend,” their attorneys
wrote.
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Keep our investigators on the job uncovering the truth:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|