This Week At The Legislature
We were in session for just one day this week before being recessed again until June 16. A budget is still being concocted but the ingredients are scarce, and no one’s quite sure what recipe we’re following. The House did take a vote on seven bills, on three of which I will explain my position below.
HB 2867 - OPPOSED
This was the most controversial of the bills, passing with just 33 votes. HB 2867 was an attempt at legislating antisemitism in the wake of increased attacks. To be clear: antisemitism is real and must be condemned. But HB 2867 is not a thoughtful or effective way to address it. Instead, this bill opens the door to lawsuits against teachers, allowing students or parents to sue educators directly for content they claim is antisemitic, without any investigation, due process, or opportunity for resolution through the school system.
The bill adopts a broad definition of antisemitism that includes criticism of Israeli government policy, which could mean teachers are sued for presenting accurate, historically grounded information about world events. Discussing facts or exploring nuanced history in a classroom could turn into a legal minefield under this bill. Not only does it chill free speech, but it undermines the professionalism of our educators and convolutes the classroom with politics.
At a time when we’re facing teacher shortages and increased polarization in education, I feel that bills like HB 2867 don’t make our schools safer—it makes them more vulnerable to intimidation. In order to move through and resolve tough societal issues we must be able to have open and honest discourse, otherwise we are at risk of continual division that perpetuates fear and violence.
I opposed this bill along with organizations like the National Foundation for Jewish Women, ACLU, and the Arizona Education Association. It now heads to the Governor’s desk to be vetoed or signed into law.
SB 1247 - SUPPORTED
There has been spirited debate around this bill, which had the original language struck and amended to increase the legal age to purchase tobacco in Arizona to 21, conforming to 2019 federal policy. At face value, it’s a pretty commonsense public health move, especially as we see rising rates of youth vaping and tobacco use.
But through the process, the bill received a carve-out: active-duty military members, including the National Guard and reserves, would still be allowed to purchase tobacco at 18. Supporters argue it's a gesture of respect for those in uniform. But here’s the question that comes with it: should we create two classes of young people, where civilian youth are protected from addiction risks and military youth are not?
One of my colleagues, a veteran, worked to amend the bill to ensure that military service itself wouldn’t be penalized, and I respect the care that went into that. But this is one of those bills where the intent and the impact might not quite line up. We can honor our servicemembers without compromising their long-term health in the process.
SB 1230 - SUPPORTED
This bill requires a portion of the Medical Marijuana Fund to be used for FDA-approved clinical trials studying cannabis’ safety, efficacy, and interactions, especially for conditions like autism, epilepsy, PTSD, and chronic pain. Research grants would be issued through a competitive process through DHS and awarded to nonprofit organizations and universities. One research award has already been granted to the Southern Autism Research and Resource Center, which will conclude in 2027.
I supported this bill because it uses our existing marijuana resources wisely to better understand and responsibly integrate medical cannabis into our healthcare system. While the bill died during this vote, it will be brought back with hopefully more support. Physicians and organizations like the Arizona Medical Association have signed in support of the policy.