Free speech takes a hit in the UK—and Eid al-Adha revives ancient blood rituals.

No images? Click here [link removed]

We're Back

This week’s Unbelief Brief covers the troubling conviction of atheist Hamit Coskun in the UK—penalized not for violence, but for offending religious sensibilities. Meanwhile, as Eid al-Adha approaches, our latest EXMNA Insight traces the holiday’s origins to pre-Islamic blood rites and examines the ethical cost of ritual slaughter today.

Unbelief Brief

In a severe blow to free expression, atheist Hamit Coskun has been convicted [[link removed]] of “disorderly conduct” by a UK judge for burning a Qur’an outside the Turkish Embassy in London. Coskun insisted that his protest was against the religion of Islam and the theocratization of Turkey, rather than Muslims as people. The judge did “not accept” this claim, in part based on “Islamophobic” comments Coskun made during police interviews. This, of course, should be irrelevant to the charge of disorderly conduct at the time of the burning, but the judge cited it anyway. It is difficult to see this as anything other than a conviction for thought crimes.

At the scene of the protest, Coskun was allegedly attacked [[link removed]] with a knife by an enraged assailant who has yet to stand trial. After being injured during the assualt, a passing delivery driver also kicked Coskun as he lay on the ground. The judge appeared to suggest that Coskun himself was to blame for this latter assault, citing it as evidence that his actions caused “distress” to people in the vicinity (see point 19 in the ruling here [[link removed]]). He also judged [[link removed]] that “Coskun knew burning the Quran would be provocative” because of Salwan Momika’s assassination [[link removed]] earlier this year for doing the same. In other words, Coskun should not have done this, because it could have provoked terrorism against him—an open-and-shut case of victim-blaming. Indeed, he has faced repeated death threats [[link removed]] since burning the Qur’an, forcing his relocation to an undisclosed safe house. Following the judge’s logic to its only conclusion, he “had it coming.”

Coskun’s legal fees are being covered by the UK’s National Secular Society [[link removed]] and by the Free Speech Union, who are running a fundraiser [[link removed]] for this purpose. Both have committed to appealing the verdict. The hope now is for sanity to prevail in a higher court; while Coskun was “only” fined £240, the precedent this verdict will set if allowed to stand is unacceptable. Though UK government officials insist there are no blasphemy laws in the country, their legal system has just convicted a man for it.

EXMNA Insights

Eid al-Adha [[link removed]], Islam’s “Festival of Sacrifice,” will begin this year on the evening of Thursday, June 5. As millions of Muslims prepare to mark the occasion with ritual animal slaughter [[link removed](Ritual_Sacrifice)], it’s worth examining the origins and ethical implications of this tradition.

The ritual slaughter of animals to appease divine forces predates Islam and finds its roots in ancient pagan traditions across the Middle East and beyond. In Mesopotamian, Greek, and Semitic religions, animal sacrifices were performed to gain favor from gods, seek protection, or atone for sins. For instance, pre-Islamic Arab tribes practiced blood sacrifices [[link removed]] during pilgrimages to sacred sites, including but not limited to the Kaaba in Mecca. These rites were believed to transfer guilt from humans to animals and symbolically purify the worshipper.

Though Eid al-Adha commemorates Abraham’s willingness to murder his son as a sacrifice, the act of slaughtering livestock as a divine offering mirrors these earlier pagan customs. Islam, while opposing polytheism, absorbed many ritual elements from its polytheistic milieu. The blood sacrifice of Eid al-Adha exemplifies this continuity.

Modern ethical concerns challenge the practice, particularly the method of slaughter [[link removed]]. Islamic law typically prohibits stunning [[link removed]], requiring a sharp blade to the throat while invoking God's name. This method, while intended to minimize suffering, often falls short in practice [[link removed]], especially in mass slaughter conditions where stress and improper technique are common. Clinging to pre-modern rituals [[link removed]] while ignoring more humane alternatives raises serious moral questions—especially when compassion and ethics are core Islamic values.

Until next week,

The Team at Ex-Muslims of North America

P.S. We’d love to hear from you! Share your feedback at [email protected].

make a contribution [[link removed]]

Whether it’s giving $5 or $500, help us fight for a future where all are free to follow their conscience.

get to know more about our mission [[link removed]]

[[link removed]] Share [link removed] Tweet [link removed] Share [[link removed]] Forward [link removed]

© 2024 Ex-Muslims of North America. All rights reserved.

Read EXMNA's Privacy Policy [[link removed]] here

You're receiving this because you've subscribed to EXMNA for regular updates and insights. If you no longer wish to receive our emails, you can unsubscribe below.

Preferences [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed]