From Americans United for Life <[email protected]>
Subject Will the Supreme Court Protect Women and Protect Life?
Date June 17, 2020 1:59 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
 The Supreme Court will soon release an important life related opinion. 

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed][UNIQID]

"I am confident that the exemplary legal team from Louisiana, led by Attorney General Jeff Landry and Solicitor General Liz Murrill, gave the Justices everything they need to ensure that all women, no matter their circumstances, will receive the high-quality, consistent medical care they deserve. I am optimistic the Court will make the right decision." —Catherine Glenn Foster, President & CEO at Americans United for Life
CONTRIBUTE ([link removed][UNIQID])

Supreme Court Issuing Ruling Soon on Pro-Life Law That Could Close Abortion Clinics ([link removed][UNIQID])
(Life News) A lawyer with the pro-life organization Americans United for Life, said this summer should give Americans a better idea about the justices’ stances on the abortion issue. She said she does not think the court will overturn Roe v. Wade soon, but it may consider abortion limits. “The court across the board in a lot of areas seems to take a more step-by-step approach,” she said. “I don’t think that’s going to change when it comes to abortion anytime soon.”

Dutch MD Euthanized Dementia Patient Despite Being Told ‘No’ ([link removed][UNIQID])
(National Review) This involuntary euthanasia was motivated by bigotry against people with dementia, masked as compassion. What other conclusion can we reach? That she was no longer compos mentis, so her opinion about her own life was unimportant? “I believed I was working within the boundaries of the law,” Arends said. Why wouldn’t she? The boundaries are meaningless. They just exist for show.

Alexandra DeSanctis on abortion and coronavirus relief, Trump v. Biden, and where 'fake news' comes from ([link removed][UNIQID])
(Life, Liberty, and Law) Alexandra DeSanctis, staff writer at National Review and Visiting Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, DC, returns to "Life, Liberty, and Law" with Tom Shakely and Noah Brandt to talk Planned Parenthood's capture of coronavirus relief funds meant for American small businesses, the present and future of the "Trump v. Biden" presidential race, and a troubling case study in where "fake news" comes from when reporters act as activists.


** Listen and subscribe
------------------------------------------------------------
Americans United for Life presents "Life, Liberty, and Law", a weekly podcast featuring conversations on the human right to life.
[link removed][UNIQID]
Listen and subscribe. ([link removed][UNIQID])

Missouri Commission Allows Controversial Planned Parenthood to Remain Open ([link removed][UNIQID]&mc_cid=51d956fcd6&mc_eid=[UNIQID])
(Breitbart) Catherine Glenn Foster, president of Americans United for Life, said in a statement the St. Louis Planned Parenthood facility “is a threat to public health and safety, plain and simple”: Missouri concluded that the St. Louis Planned Parenthood did not meet basic health and safety standards, yet as too often happens, judges have stepped in as de facto Planned Parenthood cheerleaders to keep a substandard abortion business open. What is the point of a democracy if state leaders elected by the people are prohibited from ensuring basic health and safety? We expect high standards for businesses that serve the public, but apparently no standards for abortion businesses. We’re stuck in a Twilight Zone of the judiciary’s making.

Sworn depositions raise new questions in Planned Parenthood fetal tissue controversy ([link removed][UNIQID]&mc_cid=51d956fcd6&mc_eid=[UNIQID])
(Fox News) Gatter specifically testified that she would alter her “techniques.” While discussing her “evolution” in thinking on the issue, Gatter said: “By the time I was at PP [Planned Parenthood] Pasadena, many of us were moving in the direction of making this distinction between method and procedure, method and technique. And so I was very comfortable at that time that the difference in technique did not – doing different techniques: manual aspiration versus electronic aspiration – did not really affect the procedure or the method; so it was, therefore, permissible in terms of fetal tissue donation.” Catherine Glenn Foster, an attorney who leads Americans United for Life, told Fox News that PPFA's distinction "doesn't matter legally. They are changing the procedure in order to sell ... the bodies of abortion victims."
CONTRIBUTE ([link removed][UNIQID])

Americans United for Life works toward the day when all are welcomed throughout life and protected in law! Please consider supporting our mission of service. ([link removed][UNIQID])
[link removed][UNIQID]
[link removed][UNIQID]
[link removed][UNIQID]

============================================================
Copyright © Americans United for Life, All Rights Reserved.
You are receiving this as a supporter of Americans United for Life, having opted in on our website or at our events.

Americans United for Life
1150 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis