Common sense prevailed in court. Now let's get going on some reforms in Congress.
E&E News (5/29/25) reports: "The Supreme Court on Thursday placed new limits on environmental reviews for major federal projects such as pipelines and railways. In a unanimous 8-0 ruling, the justices found that a lower court should more narrowly tailor National Environmental Policy Act analyses to focus on effects that are close to projects under review and fall directly under the purview of approving agencies. 'Simply stated, NEPA is a procedural cross-check, not a substantive roadblock. The goal of the law is to inform agency decisionmaking, not to paralyze it,' said Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing the opinion for the court, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett...The decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County is expected to have significant implications for how courts handle lawsuits over NEPA reviews, as the Trump administration has vowed to boost fossil fuel development and streamline project permitting."
|
|
|
|
|
"Mandates require policymakers to pick winners and losers, which is a highly difficult task given their limited knowledge. The problem is particularly acute for new technologies with high uncertainties over cost and performance. For example, a policy that mandates electric vehicles as a preferred technology can backfire if the price of gasoline falls sharply, or EVs fail to develop economically and technically as hoped for by advocates. "
– Kenneth Costello,
The Rio Grande
Foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|