Who Really Signed the Orders and Pardons?

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here
[[link removed]]
for more

[ACT For America]
[[link removed]]


[Share]
[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]
[Browser]
[[link removed]]

BIDEN’S AUTOPEN SCANDAL:

_A Crisis of Legitimacy Demands Investigation_

The Biden administration’s prolific use of an autopen to sign
critical documents, including executive orders and pardons, has
ignited a firestorm of controversy, raising serious questions about
who truly wielded power during Joe Biden’s presidency. Reports from
the Oversight Project, a Heritage Foundation arm, reveal that NEARLY
EVERY DOCUMENT BEARING BIDEN’S SIGNATURE—except his 2024 campaign
withdrawal letter—USED AN IDENTICAL AUTOPEN SIGNATURE, casting doubt
on his mental acuity and control over the executive branch. MOST
ALARMINGLY, NEW REPORTING HIGHLIGHTS A GLARING ABSENCE: THE REQUIRED
ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURES FROM SUBORDINATES AUTHORIZING AUTOPEN USE, A
SAFEGUARD TO ENSURE PRESIDENTIAL INTENT. This omission fuels
accusations of a constitutional crisis, with unelected staffers
potentially orchestrating policy behind a façade of Biden’s
approval.

THE OVERSIGHT PROJECT IDENTIFIED 45 EXECUTIVE ORDERS SIGNED BY
AUTOPEN, including key actions like the August 2022 student loan
forgiveness order and the December 2024 energy export pause, which
House Speaker Mike Johnson claimed Biden was unaware of signing.
ADDITIONALLY, 17 SWEEPING PARDONS ISSUED ON JANUARY 19, 2025,
INCLUDING PREEMPTIVE CLEMENCY FOR THE JANUARY 6 COMMITTEE, DR. ANTHONY
FAUCI, GENERAL MARK MILLEY, AND HUNTER BIDEN, BEAR THE SAME AUTOPEN
SIGNATURE. Notably, Hunter Biden’s pardon signature appeared
“shaky,” suggesting a rare handwritten exception, while others
lacked the mandatory subordinate authorization, rendering their
legitimacy questionable. Other controversial signatures include
routine correspondence and a 2022 Ukraine aid package, where the White
House went to great lengths to claim Biden signed in person, yet
autopen evidence persists.

GRAVE ACCUSATIONS HAVE SURFACED THAT PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS MAY HAVE
BEEN SOLD BY ADMINISTRATION INSIDERS. Posts on X and reports from
conservative outlets like Blaze Media allege that staffers, including
White House Staff Secretary Neera Tanden and Chief of Staff Jeff
Zients, controlled the autopen, potentially bypassing Biden’s
knowledge or consent. A HIDDEN-CAMERA VIDEO FROM OMG REPORTEDLY CAUGHT
SBA ADVISOR TYLER ROBINSON ADMITTING ZIENTS OVERSAW AUTOPEN USE,
SUGGESTING STAFFERS “RUBBER-STAMPED” PARDONS AND ORDERS.
Speculation also swirls around Hunter Biden and Jill Biden’s
influence, with Heritage attorney Samuel Dewey noting Hunter’s
pardon as a possible insider deal. These claims, while unproven,
amplify concerns of corruption, with Missouri AG Andrew Bailey
demanding a DOJ probe into whether unelected aides pushed radical
policies under Biden’s name.

EVIDENCE POINTS TO A SHADOW ADMINISTRATION led by figures like Tanden,
Zients, and possibly Jill Biden, with House Oversight Committee Chair
James Comer alleging staffers made decisions without Biden’s
coherent input. Speaker Johnson’s 2024 encounter with Biden, where
the former president seemed unaware of signing a natural gas export
pause, underscores claims of a presidency run by aides. The Oversight
Project’s findings suggest these staffers swapped between “Autopen
A” and “B” to push through midnight directives, evading
accountability.

LEGAL EXPERTS, INCLUDING JEFFREY CROUCH, AFFIRM THAT AUTOPEN
SIGNATURES ARE VALID IF AUTHORIZED, BUT THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES THE
PRESIDENT’S INTENT. The absence of subordinate signatures and
Biden’s reported cognitive decline—evidenced by public gaffes and
Johnson’s testimony—raise doubts about his awareness. While the
2005 DOJ memo permits autopen use for bills, no such clarity exists
for pardons, and the 4th Circuit’s 2024 ruling notes pardons need
not be written, yet intent is paramount.

THIS SCANDAL DEMANDS URGENT INVESTIGATION. Congress must subpoena
Tanden, Zients, and others to determine who controlled the autopen and
whether Biden knowingly authorized these actions. If pardons were sold
or issued without presidential consent, they must be voided. The
American people deserve transparency to ensure no unelected cabal
usurped the presidency, undermining democracy itself.

[Undo Biden's Autopen Abuse]
[[link removed]]


[ACT Now: Click Here!]
[[link removed]]


 

_WE DEPEND ON YOUR SUPPORT TO DELIVER REAL RESULTS!
[[link removed]]_

_FOR THE PRICE OF A COUPLE OF CUPS OF COFFEE A MONTH, BECOME A MONTHLY
MEMBER AND RECEIVE A FREE COPY OF MY NY TIMES BESTSELLER, ‘BECAUSE
THEY HATE,’ WHILE SUPPLIES LAST.
[[link removed]]_

_SUPPORT THIS ISSUE WITH A ONE-TIME, TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION TO HELP
US CONCENTRATE ON THIS CRUCIAL ISSUE!
[[link removed]]_

_THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION,_

_BRIGITTE GABRIEL_

 

[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


_ACT for America Education, a 501(c)(3) organization._
_All donations are tax-deductible._

1083 Independence Blvd, STE 806
Virginia Beach, VA 23455 USA

Contribute
[[link removed]]
| Charity Navigator
[[link removed]]
| Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
 

[Share]
[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]
[Browser]
[[link removed]]