Yesterday we unpacked tokenomics. Today, we turn to governance—because voting rights don’t always mean real control.

Many tokens claim to be “community-led,” but if insiders hold most of the supply, the vote’s already rigged. True governance tokens let users shape upgrades, fees, and direction. But look closely—does your vote actually matter, or is it just a checkbox?

Participating in governance can influence the future of a protocol… or reveal who’s really pulling the strings.

Tomorrow, we’ll dig into DAOs—decentralized in name, but are they really?

———————————————————————————

^Sponsored Content^

———————————————————————————

**Poll Of The Day**

View image: ([link removed])
Caption:

———————————————————————————

**Fun Fact Of The Day**

Uniswap’s first governance proposal in 2020 failed—not because users disagreed, but because it didn’t meet the minimum vote threshold. Even in crypto, apathy can kill participation.

———————————————————————————


———

You are reading a plain text version of this post. For the best experience, copy and paste this link in your browser to view the post online:
[link removed]