Hi Friend —
After my last message about voter singularity and “Smart Paper,” we received a wide range of responses — some hopeful, some cautious, and some deeply concerned.
I want you to know: I understand. And you’re right to ask questions.
Technological advancements are reshaping every part of our lives—how we bank, shop, even how we communicate. Elections should be no exception. Now is the time to demand meaningful reform through tech innovation, while we still have the chance to shape a system that reflects the values of transparency, integrity, and citizen control.
We’ve all seen the damage caused by _misuse_ of election technology— when unseen systems make decisions that affect our lives, when accountability disappears behind complexity, when those in power turn complexity into confusion, then wield it as a weapon.
That’s exactly why we’re having this conversation. Because technology is moving fast — and what comes next must be built with honesty, simplicity, and the consent of the voters. Not with machines controlled by rogue agents. Not behind closed doors. Not with fine print. Not with blind faith. That time has passed. Citizens must engage in what comes next — or it will come next without us.
The only way to ensure these systems serve _us_ is to be part of shaping them from the start.
### On faith.
I also know many people of faith are watching the rapid advances with growing concern. It can feel overwhelming — even threatening — as if humanity is losing its soul in a world moving too fast. But we must also remember: God is not surprised by any of this. He is not absent from our future. His sovereignty does not end where innovation begins.
“_“But_ _the plans of the LORD stand firm forever, the purposes of His heart through all generations.”_“ — Psalm 33:11
So, if you felt unsure or even alarmed by terms like _blockchain_ or _Smart Paper_, let’s talk about what these ideas _actually_ mean, and what they don’t.
### Why Blockchain?
Let’s start by talking about blockchain. Many people were concerned by my suggestion that election processes could be reliably supported by blockchain — and it seemed like there was some confusion about blockchain being the same thing as Bitcoin. Blockchain is not Bitcoin. Blockchain is just a system of recordkeeping that _can’t be changed or hidden_. Bitcoin and other crypto currencies use blockchain technology to keep accurate records. Blockchain is also used for things like supply chain management, medical records, real estate transactions, and more. It’s a distributed ledger — a secure open notebook — that anyone can read, but no one can erase.
Imagine if voter registrations, ballot counts, and election certifications were written into a system that _no one_ could manipulate — not a political party, not a government agency, not a vendor. That’s the vision. Not surrender. Not secrecy. Transparency by design.
### Why Smart Paper?
As for** Smart Paper **—** **it’s a concept we’re actively exploring. “Smart” paper ballots. A physical ballot that could carry a digital fingerprint, not for voting online, but for helping _verify that your paper vote was counted_. Nothing about it would move voting away from paper or local control. If anything, it brings us closer to both.
And, for good measure, let’s define **digital fingerprint**. A digital fingerprint is like a unique seal that proves something is real and unchanged. Think of it like a tamper-evident seal on a medicine bottle. You don’t need to open the bottle to know if it’s been messed with — the seal tells you if it’s safe and authentic.
In the digital world, that “seal” can be a string of numbers and letters created by a secure formula (called a _hash_). For example, when a ballot is printed, the system could generate a unique hash (aka digital fingerprint) that’s tied to that exact ballot.
A typical hash is 64 characters long. Here’s a sample of how it might look:
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
It would be long enough to be virtually impossible to fake or duplicate. If someone tries to alter or duplicate the ballot, the fingerprint won’t match anymore. That mismatch would immediately reveal that something’s wrong.
So, even without scanning anything, officials can check whether a ballot is real and unchanged — just by checking the “fingerprint” of the ballot.
It’s a way to add security and transparency to your ballot _without_ giving up the privacy of your vote.
### **The big question: Where do we go from here?**
In the weeks ahead, we’ll begin unpacking these ideas — secure voter registration; real-time resolution of identity, residency, citizenship; smart paper, verified casting and counting of votes; public auditability; algorhythmic redistricting; and more. We’ll cover it all, step by step. You deserve the full picture, without the tech jargon. And we’re going to give it to you.
To those who wrote in with concerns: thank you. Your voice matters. This is a conversation — and we’re committed to having it openly, honestly, and together.
Keep the faith! Never quit! Ephesians 6 FTW!
Ever onward,
View image: ([link removed])
Caption:
P.S. If you’re interested in a one-stop shop for our ideas on election innovation, we wrote them up in a report titled “The Way Forward”. It’s on our website, but also l[inked here for your convenience. ]([link removed])
**P.P.S. One more thing … please see below and share as you see fit. Our team has decided to print this list in every newsletter we publish until our offer is accepted.**
“**We continue to offer the following to the Trump Administration **👇.
- Evidence given by us to (and buried by) the FBI from 2020–2022, including geospatial proof of ballot dropbox abuse.
- Info on the non-citizen database first reported by Gregg Phillips in 2016 and buried under unfulfilled whistleblower protections.
- Approx 10k documents on Konnech, the CCP-affiliated election software company (docs currently on [Truethevote.org]([link removed]) and [Open.Ink]([link removed])) and our investigation timeline, including my and Gregg Phillips’ imprisonment—while the FBI, despite knowing the truth, watched us be taken away in chains to solitary confinement— and did nothing.
- Banking records tied to a suspected multi-state ballot trafficking ring—evidence we tried to give the FBI. They wouldn’t take it. It was about that time when we learned we were their targets.
- Subpoenas from Google and Apple, revealing the Biden DOJ’s demand for all my accounts and archives in a sealed, years-long Grand Jury probe by the Northern District of New York—part of a secretive effort to criminally indict Gregg Phillips and me.
- Full texts and emails with all FBI agents we dealt with—names, contacts, all of it.“ —
———————————————————————————
View image: ([link removed])
Follow image link: ([link removed])
Caption: [truethevote.org/donate]([link removed])
———
You are reading a plain text version of this post. For the best experience, copy and paste this link in your browser to view the post online:
[link removed]
