View Online [[link removed]] | Subscribe now [[link removed]]Journalism from theKnow better. Do better.Climate. Change.News from the ground, in a warming world
By Jack Graham | Climate Journalist
Europe's capital
Imagine an airport terminal in the middle of a city, its corridors full of people - from suited politicos to Sámi Indigenous people rushing between meetings.
I'm describing the European Parliament in Brussels, where Context colleagues and I showed our groundbreaking documentary [[link removed]] on fast fashion last week.
Members of the European Parliament, or MEPs, NGO workers and businesspeople sat around a grand room fit for the continent’s leaders to watch our film and discuss its implications.
In case you missed it, the film by my colleague Albert Han revealed how fashion giants are turning increasingly to shipping by air, which has major impacts both on the environment and on working conditions for many of the millions of garment workers in Bangladesh.
In bringing this work to a cross-party group of European parliamentarians, we also got to hear directly how policymakers were struggling to respond to the issues our work raised.
MEPs Sirpa Pietikäinen, François Kalfon and former MEP Samira Rafaela discuss fast fashion at the EU Parliament in Brussels, May 14, 2025. Argyro Christina Partsakoulaki/Thomson Reuters Foundation
"Well, I'm very frank with you," said Sirpa Pietikäinen, a long-serving MEP and a previous Finnish environment minister from the centre-right European People's Party (EPP) bloc.
"We all know what the political situation globally is with Trump and Trumpism. We know what it is in Europe, as the European Parliament, and in our member states," she told the panel, chaired by Context's Europe Correspondent Jo Gill.
An almighty battle is brewing in the European Union, the MEPs said, over hard-fought regulations [[link removed]] aimed at holding companies accountable for their supply chains, including the fashion industry, which is causing major environmental and social damages [[link removed]].
With a new Parliament in place, much of that work could be undone as the power has shifted in favour of MEPs who want to make Europe more competitive globally and cut back on environmental regulations.
In particular, an omnibus package of measures [[link removed]] proposed by the European Commission is being debated. It aims to reduce companies' obligations to report on sustainability.
Pietikäinen said those pushing for deregulation have a "grip" on the main parties of the centre and right in parliament, and that changing the rules will hit sustainable brands whose products cost more.
"This is not a level playing field for those who pay properly for workers, who know what they use, who use sustainable materials and so forth," she explained.
Garment employees work at a textile mill in Bangladesh, February 7, 2021. REUTERS/Mohammad Ponir Hossain
Loopholes
At the event, I sat next to a woman from California who was practising her very own slow fashion: She was knitting while watching our documentary.
Unfortunately, the textile industry itself isn't quite so innocent.
François Kalfon, a new French MEP from the centre-left Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D), said China is taking over European logistics infrastructure and exploiting loopholes like the 150-euro customs allowance that cheap clothes imports can easily duck under.
A similar loophole in the United States was shut by President Donald Trump’s trade war, as small, direct-to-consumer packages from companies like China’s online clothing retailer Shein now face 54% tariffs [[link removed]].
But import rules are just one reason for the power of fast fashion juggernauts, which also enjoy significant tax incentives and customs support in places like China and Bangladesh, Kalfon said.
"This system is not just aggressive. It is heavily subsidised and organised by nation states, even empires," he said.
So how can the world, and Europe, slow down this express train - or plane - of cheap clothing?
This system is not just aggressive. It is heavily subsidised and organised by nation states, even empires.
François Kalfon
Samira Rafaela, a former Dutch MEP from the centrist Renew group and labour rights expert at Cornell University, said there is no excuse for companies that do not trace impacts in their supply chain - such as forced labour - with the innovations and technology available.
Rather than the burden of reporting for companies - a major argument against regulations - she said the impact on the planet and workers should hold more weight.
In the documentary, Context heard several such stories of burden, with women working overtime for no extra pay, dependent on an industry which continues to grow at breakneck speed [[link removed]].
We've explored this topic through our in-depth reporting [[link removed]] in the region, and our Bangladesh correspondent Tahmid Zami will continue to investigate these stories on the ground.
Like Rafaela told us: "It's just really not fair that we are walking in these clothes every day, knowing what the stories are behind it."
See you next time,
Jack
This week's top picks Q&A: Brazil's COP30 CEO on Trump’s impact and forest arson [[link removed]]
Despite the U.S. climate retreat and the risk of forest arson, the chief executive of COP30 sees the transition to sustainability as inevitable
AI helps tackle traffic carbon emissions in Buenos Aires [[link removed]]
Artificial intelligence and Google Maps help Buenos Aires optimize traffic flow that can lower carbon emissions
What does Trump's deep-sea mining push mean for the ocean? [[link removed]]
Ocean mineral hunt sparks legal chaos and threatens unknown species
Read all of our coverage here [[link removed]] Food for thought [[link removed]] An Orca in Iceland [[link removed]]
Icelandic newspaper Heimildin released an investigation last week on the climate tech firm Climeworks' carbon capture claims. Despite major promises, the Swiss company, which is developing technology to filter carbon dioxide from the air, has struggled to capture even the equivalent of its operating emissions at its Orca and Mammoth plants in Iceland, the report said.
The notoriously tricky technology to pluck planet-heating gases out of the air is struggling to get off the ground, and these new findings have triggered further debate. Climeworks co-founder Jan Wurzbacher said the company has been transparent about the shortcomings and technological challenges to achieve real-world results, which can't be expected to happen overnight.
While the industry says we won't solve climate change without carbon removal, critics say the cash should be spent on cutting our own emissions instead of on an unproven technology. Read the investigation and the co-founder's response to see what you make of the debate.
[[link removed]]Discover more Nature [[link removed]] Climate Risks [[link removed]] Net Zero [[link removed]] Just Transition [[link removed]] Climate Justice [[link removed]] Green Cities [[link removed]] Thank you for reading!
If you like this newsletter, please forward to a friend or share it on Social Media. [[link removed]'s%20battle%20with%20fast%20fashion&url=[link removed]]
We value your feedback - let us know what you think [mailto:
[email protected]].
[[link removed]]
This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters Foundation located at 5 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AQ - a registered charity in the United Kingdom and the United States.
If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you do not wish to receive this type of correspondence in the future, contact us at [
[email protected]] so that we can remove you from this list.
Thomson Reuters Foundation terms and conditions and privacy statement can be found online at www.trust.org [[link removed]].
Photos courtesy of Reuters or Thomson Reuters Foundation.
Manage your Subscriptions [[link removed]] | Unsubscribe from all TRF communications [link removed]