By Ren LaForme, managing editor
Ten down, 40 to go.
When we launched The Poynter 50 — our yearlong project highlighting people and moments that changed journalism over the past half century — we knew it would be ambitious. But we also knew this industry is full of big swings, quiet revolutions and stories that age in fascinating ways. So far, we’ve covered groundbreaking tech shifts (Mercury Center), seismic scoops (Matt Drudge, TMZ), and a teenage bystander who changed history with a phone.
To mark the occasion, I sat down with senior media writer Tom Jones, co-creator of the series, for a quick gut check. What’s surprised us? What has sparked debate? And where are we headed next?
Here’s our conversation, lightly edited for brevity and clarity.
Ren LaForme: We’re 10 stories into The Poynter 50. What’s surprised you most so far — either in the response, the process or the stories themselves?
I’ll start: I have been really heartened by how many newsmakers have wanted to talk to us about these big moments. Basically everyone involved with “Serial,” including Sarah Koenig, Julie Snyder and Ira Glass; Wolf Blitzer, ProPublica’s founders. We wanted to aim big when we decided to go for this project, and aim big we did. I just wasn’t sure the folks involved in these moments would want to chat about them. But we’ve heard more yeses than nos. It’s been great.
Tom Jones: To quote Tony Soprano, “‘Remember when …’ is the lowest form of conversation.” But this hasn’t been a “remember when” project. We said that right from the start — when we came up with this idea, we didn’t want it to be just a stroll down memory lane. This project has been mostly about looking forward. How did these moments in the past change things for the future?
And that’s why I think the people we’ve reached out to want to talk to us. They aren’t there to just tell us about their war stories (literally, in the case of Wolf Blitzer talking about CNN’s Gulf War coverage), but they want to share how it changed everything from their lives to the industry they work in. Speaking of Wolf, he told me people still come up to him to talk about CNN’s coverage of the Gulf War.
But I tell ya, looking back can be fun. I’ve already learned a lot that I didn’t know. What was the most surprising thing you learned while editing these stories so far?
LaForme: Let me counter your Tony Soprano quote with one of my own that I’ve been thinking about during this project: “I’m getting the feeling that I came in at the end. The best is over.”
As an editor, this project has been a bit of a stretch for me because I have only been conscious for about half of the timeline we’re looking at. Some of my earliest news memories are the Bosnian War and Kurt Cobain’s death, you know? And you guys hear me say this all the time, but I am big on context. And so the most surprising thing for me is just learning about the context behind a lot of these big moments that I knew about, but didn’t experience personally.
I knew Matt Drudge made his name on the Monica Lewinsky scoop, but everything around how Newsweek had the story and was holding it blew my mind. Seeing a young Wolf Blitzer break news about the Gulf War — wild! The fact that early news websites waffled about paywalls at first — just wow.
I’ve learned a lot, but it’s also a bit of an emotional roller coaster. You can’t help but wonder what would have happened if some of these things had played out differently.
Let me ask you something that has, I think, become more clear to people as we’ve published these stories, but that I still hear from time to time. What makes a moment feel like a Poynter 50 story to you? We’ve reviewed a lot of pitches and some are immediate yeses, while others need more finessing.
Jones: It’s a great question and sometimes the answer is as simple and vague as, “When you know, you know.” We still have arguments about what should or should not be on the list. It just can’t be a major news story, such as 9/11, or a famous news person, such as Dan Rather. I’m still a sports guy at heart. So I’ll use a sports term: game-changer. When we discuss these ideas, the first question is always, “What changed?” It’s like a before-and-after photo. Things were one way before it happened and completely different after.
I’ll give you an example: the Darnella Frazier video of the George Floyd murder. Of the stories we’ve done so far, this one has had the biggest impact on me. Aside from being a powerful, sobering moment, it showed that anyone with a phone can be a witness to history and do what journalists do at the most basic level: tell the world about something they need to know. We’ve had cellphone videos before, but I don’t know of any video I’ve seen that had such a major impact. It impacted our entire country.
Let me ask you: Which piece has sparked the biggest reaction so far? And which one resonated with you the most?
LaForme: Personally, I really loved Amaris Castillo’s story about Barbara Walters. The Poynter 50 focuses on significant people and moments from the past 50 years, but most of our picks have been “moments” so far. Barbara Walters was our first “people.” And we had to grapple with how to tell her story within the constraints of this project, which is supposed to be really tight, sparse work. We ended up picking three major achievements in her life: when she sat in the chair as the first female evening anchor on a major broadcast network, her iconic grilling of celebrities and newsmakers on “20/20” and the launch of “The View,” which was really her brainchild. And the details that Amaris dredged up were just — chef’s kiss.
For the audience, the standout was also from Amaris: her story on TMZ scooping all of the mainstream news organizations on Michael Jackson’s death and how that was sort of the moment that digital news organizations stepped up and showed us who they could be. I think that story just had the right recipe: celebrity intrigue, behind-the-scenes details about what it was like to be a Los Angeles Times reporter that day, a coming-of-age story for the new kids in the media sphere. It was all there.
Speaking of behind-the-scenes details, many of the stories we’re most passionate about have made it through the selection process and been given the green light, but there are some that are still caught up. If you could assign one story that hasn’t been written yet, just for your own satisfaction, what would it be?
Jones: Da da da … da da da. Know what that is? The theme of ESPN’s “SportsCenter.” We’re going to do ESPN. I will quit if we don’t do ESPN. OK, I won’t quit. But I’ll pout for a really long time. My desk will become a mess. I’ll miss deadlines. It’ll get ugly. You won’t like it.
Seriously though. I’m confident that we’re going to do ESPN. The key is figuring out how to write about ESPN. We can’t just say “ESPN” and leave it at that. I have some ideas on how we’re going to do it, but there’s no question that ESPN changed sports and, especially, the habits of sports fans. This is the fun part of the project. We know many of the things we want to talk about, it’s just coming up with clever ways to tell these stories and finding just the right people to help us tell them.
I am also going to continue my weekly pitch of the show “Nightline.” But I’m still working on my good arguments for that, and I’ll bring that up in our next meeting.
I’ll throw it right back at you: What’s the one story we haven’t greenlit yet that you would like to see done?
LaForme: I almost hate to bring it up again because my Twitter mentions have finally calmed down after about a decade, but I’d like to see some version of Gamergate make the cut. For those who have not had the pleasure, depending on your viewpoint, it was either a movement to bring ethics to game journalism or a misogynistic online harassment campaign against feminism, diversity and the like in video game culture. I know which one I believe. I was personally involved because I agreed to appear on a panel about it for the Society of Professional Journalists, where I sat opposite Milo Yiannopoulos, among others. We had to end early because of a bomb threat.
Anyway, you can see the blueprints for the MAGA movement and the broader backlash to the mainstream press in that story, among so many other things. Some dark corners of the internet crawled out into the limelight and never really went back. It really set the stage for the years that followed.
Final question, Tom. Without giving too much away, what kinds of moments or people are we likely to see in the next 40? Are there any stories you expect will be more controversial?
Jones: There are a few that I do expect to be fairly controversial but they simply cannot be ignored. I won’t give too much away, but let’s say it involves the current political climate and attacks on the press. We will name names, and try to explain just how in the world we got here.
But it won’t be all bleak. We have some truly great people that we are going to profile, we will look at some moments that made the media better over the years, and there’s one more that I cannot wait to get into that was the inspiration for this entire project. (Hint: It’s only the best journalism movie ever made!)
LaForme: Agreed on that. There are some people and organizations that have shaped the past and continue to shape the future of the news media who aren’t necessarily benefiting the press. The exact opposite, in fact. We have to acknowledge them in this project.
On the flip side, I’m really looking forward to — and I’m probably spoiling something here — recognizing the biggest name at the intersection of comedy and news. Amid some of the serious topics we’re reflecting on, I think it’ll provide a moment of zen. And to quote my friend Ernest Hooper, that’s all I’m saying.
The Poynter 50 … so far
Here are all the Poynter 50 stories we’ve published so far: