From Jon Fleischman from Does It Matter? <[email protected]>
Subject Six Reasons Biological Males Should Not Be Competing In Women’s Sports
Date May 15, 2025 12:31 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this post on the web at [link removed]

Any sane person understands the intrinsic, God-given differences between men and women, differences that extend absolutely to the realm of athletic competition. Since sports have been organized, we've recognized those differences with separate categories, a common-sense practice offering fair play and respecting the unique achievements of each sex. To deny this reality in the name of radical inclusivity is not only preposterous but an appallingly egregious assault on justice for women athletes who strive to compete on a level playing field against their biological peers.
The evidence of this biological reality isn't just manifest; it's typically a spectacle. We've witnessed the unabashed dominance of biological males, even after hormone therapy, as they shatter female records in sport after sport – track, swimming, martial arts – with margins that underscore the utter folly of this policy. These aren't edge cases; these are blatant examples of ideology trumping biology at the cost of female athletes.
Six reasons why biological males should be barred from competing in women's sports:
1) Irrefutable Biological Superiority: The immutable biological advantages of male puberty – greater muscle mass, bone density, and cardiovascular capacity – provide an insurmountable advantage, making competition with biological females inherently unfair.
2) Destroying Fair Competition and Opportunity: Allowing biologically male athletes to compete in women's categories isn't inclusive; it's prejudicial, preventing biological females from their due chance at success, recognition, and advancement in their exclusive field.
3) Unacceptable Risk of Physical Injury: The mere disparity in size and strength between biological males and females poses a risk of severe injury to female athletes in contact and collision sports, one that cannot be ignored.
4) Threatening the Viability of Women's Sports: When biological males consistently dominate women's sports, it will inevitably discourage biological females from participating, thereby bringing about the decline and eventual demise of women's sports as a competitive, viable endeavor.
5) Stealing Opportunities from Biological Females: Every roster spot, every scholarship, every moment of glory given to a biological male in a women's sport is an opportunity unjustly stolen from a qualified biological female athlete.
6) Conflict with Federal Policy: The radical gender ideology California has embraced is in direct opposition to reasonable federal policies respecting biological reality in sports. The conflict highlights the dangerous divide between woke state overreach and fundamental fairness.
Public Opinion Is Overwhelming On This Topic
The proponents of this insanity represent a significant element of the far left, promoting a destructive philosophy that tramples biological reality and the rights of women athletes. The overwhelming majority of Americans, following common sense, recognize the inherent injustice of this policy and demand protection for women's sports. Polling consistently shows that the American public overwhelmingly opposes allowing biological males to compete in women's sports. For example, a survey [ [link removed] ] shows that 79% of Americans believe biological men who identify as women should not be allowed to compete in women's sports, including 67% of Democrats. Another poll [ [link removed] ] found that 69% of Americans similarly believe that trans athletes should compete on teams that align with their gender at birth. And yet another poll [ [link removed] ] also shows that majorities of U.S. adults oppose or strongly oppose laws and policies allowing trans athletes to compete on teams consistent with their gender identity.
The Political Reality
Unless Democrats nationwide can distance themselves from these extreme positions so far outside the mainstream, they will solidify their status as a party marginalized because of their ideologically extreme leadership and a party disconnected from the values and common sense of the American people

Unsubscribe [link removed]?
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: n/a
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: n/a
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a