DATELINE SUGAR COUNTRY: Earlier this month a landmark new study was released showing that burning the sugarcane fields prior to harvest has no effect on surrounding air quality when sugarcane is not being burned.
The totally unbiased study, funded by a $100,000 grant from U.S. Sugar (you’re kidding, right?), tracked air quality in the Glades region. Researchers found that during the study period, overall air quality remained within acceptable limits, and air quality during the study period was some of the best in the state.
Only one problem: while the study was conducted between April 12 and September 6, 2024, sugarcane burn season runs from October through May.
In other words, they studied sugarcane burning outside of burn season.
What’s next — a study pondering the lack of snow in July?
The study’s authors say sugarcane is burned all year; and there were indeed a few burns in May and June during the study period. But as Steve Messam, a Belle Glade resident and Senior Pastor First Church of God South Bay, told the Sierra Club: “One would think a ‘Pre-Harvest Burning of Sugarcane and Air Quality’ study would have focused on the eight months of the year when pre-harvest sugarcane field burning takes place… The majority of air quality readings took place when no sugar burning took place! When you focus on the wrong months, you are bound to come to wrong conclusions.”
Nonetheless, those behind the study are touting its conclusions as authoritative and intend for the findings to influence public policy. And maybe they figure it’ll make us forget all the other studies showing health and economic impacts on Glades residents.
The study also included an assessment of the sugarcane industry’s importance to the Glades economy and determined it was indeed important.
So in sum: a sugar industry-funded study found burning by the sugar industry is not harmful and that the sugar industry is important to the region.
Who could have seen that coming?
|