To view this email as a web page, click here

.
AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

Congressional Impotence

The Missing Branch

May 10, 2025

The first months of Donald Trump’s presidency have been defined by combat between the executive and the judiciary, while Congress sits on the sidelines—only five bills have been signed into law in Trump’s first 100 days, the fewest of any modern president. Writing in The Atlantic, Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies Director Yuval Levin warns it will be impossible to address a potential constitutional breakdown if Congress does not do its job.

 

 

On May 15, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments over executive orders limiting birthright citizenship to children of citizens and permanent residents. In a new National Affairs essay, legal scholars and Office of Legal Counsel veterans John Yoo and Robert Delahunty examine the 14th Amendment’s text, structure, and history to show why all individuals born on American soil should be recognized as American citizens.
 
As part of its assertive executive branch agenda, the Trump administration has proposed restructuring the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to consolidate medical product oversight, inspection, and policymaking tasks. Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb and Mark B. McClellan highlight the serious downsides of this reorganization.
 
On May 1, in a little-covered commencement address at the University of Alabama, President Trump for the first time delivered a 10-point distillation of his personal philosophy. Domestic Policy Studies Director Matthew Continetti digs into the speech to show what it reveals about Trump’s mindset, values, and peerless political instincts.
 
Even as other issues have taken center stage in the Trump presidency, housing unaffordability remains one of the most serious policy challenges facing our country. Writing for The American Enterprise, AEI Housing Center Codirector Tobias Peter and Salvation Army Major Ethan Frizzell explain how government policy created this crisis and lay out their vision for market-driven reform.

Developing a Model of National Security Innovation: Systems, Enablers, and Types

Policymakers in Congress and the Pentagon often call for increasing defense innovation, but these debates and proposals rarely define this objective with enough clarity to be successful. In a new paper for the Acquisition Research Symposium and Innovation Summit, AEI national defense expert William C. Greenwalt draws from scholarship on commercial innovation and the history of US defense acquisition to develop a more rigorous model of the systems, enablers, and varieties of defense innovation. Using this approach, Greenwalt argues that US defense innovation has become too process-based and incremental and that winning this new era of great-power competition will require reforming the culture, mindset, and processes of defense development and acquisition to create a faster-paced, disruptive approach.

More from AEI
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Retirement Accounts Lift over One Million Seniors Out of Poverty

Andrew G. Biggs
Little-Known Facts

What’s in House Republicans’ Student Loan Overhaul?

Preston Cooper
Forbes

Faculty Viewpoint Diversity: An Instant Fix

Jenna Silber Storey and Benjamin Storey
AEIdeas

The Unraveling Economic Order

Aaron Friedberg
The American Enterprise

Yes, the US GDP Decline Is an Ominous Sign

Phil Gramm and Donald Boudreaux
The Wall Street Journal

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

What’s Up with the Electoral College?

Jay Cost
The American Founding with Jay Cost

These Are the Days of Miracle and Wonder

Christopher J. Scalia and Rod Dreher
The Back of the Book

A Conversation with Tennessee Secretary of State Tre Hargett

John C. Fortier et al.
The Voting Booth

What Is Going On with Antisemitism at Harvard? The Free Press’s Maya Sulkin Explains.

Danielle Pletka et al.
What the Hell Is Going On?

Education and the Second Trump Administration, 107 Days In

Nat Malkus et al.
The Report Card with Nat Malkus

QUOTES OF THE WEEK

Wednesday’s strikes send a message to Pakistan that it can no longer expect to target Indians with impunity and that it will be held responsible for groups that shelter on its soil. Even if the U.S. doesn’t play an active part in the conflict, it should wish India well. A less dangerous Pakistan would be a gift to the world.

Sadanand Dhume