View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** Mission Drift: The Soaring Costs of DEI in California State and Local Government
------------------------------------------------------------
Dear John,

Although public opinion, most private organizations, and the federal government have turned against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), it remains deeply embedded in the culture of California state and local government. As a result, taxpayers and ratepayers are funding millions of dollars of government DEI-related expenditures annually, and the spending is likely to persist without public condemnation.

A focal point for public-sector DEI spending is the Government Alliance on Race and Equity ([link removed]) (GARE), whose members, which it calls racial equity practitioners, “work to equitably strengthen and steward our public goods so that individuals, families and communities can live long, healthy, joyful lives, no matter their race, class, gender, sexuality, ability, migration status, or zip code.”

GARE claims over 400 agency members nationally including about 100 California ([link removed]) cities, counties, special districts, and state government departments. Depending on their size, member organizations pay annual dues ([link removed]) between $1,000 and $22,500. Employees at member agencies may pay thousands of dollars each to attend such GARE events as the Governing for Racial Justice conference ([link removed]) in St. Louis last November.

One California agency active in GARE is the East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD). In 2023, EBMUD reported ([link removed]) eight employees in its “Diversity and Inclusion” and “Diversity Equity and Culture Administration” departments with compensation totaling over $1.5 million.

EBMUD’s water rates are considerably higher ([link removed]) than those charged by peer agencies such as Irvine Ranch Water District and the Eastern Municipal Water District (serving portions of the Inland Empire) which do not have DEI programs.

Transit agencies also participate in GARE and spend heavily on DEI personnel despite facing near-term fiscal cliffs due to diminished ridership and exhaustion of federal emergency funding during the pandemic. LA Metro plans ([link removed]) to have 25 full-time equivalent employees in its Office of Civil Rights, Diversity, and Inclusion in the upcoming fiscal year, representing six percent of head office staff. The department chief received ([link removed]) $225,000 in total compensation during 2023.

Nine state agencies, departments, and offices are also on the GARE membership rosters. State organizations have been doubling down on DEI since Gavin Newsom’s September 2022 executive order ([link removed]) which instructed agencies and departments under his control to:

a. develop or update the strategic plan to reflect the use of data analysis and inclusive practices to more effectively advance equity and to respond to identified disparities with changes to the organization's mission, vision, goals, data tools, policies, programs, operations, community engagement, tribal consultation policies and practices, and other actions as necessary to serve all Californians; and

b. as part of the development or updating of the strategic plans, engage and gather input from California communities that have been historically disadvantaged and underserved within the scope of policies or programs administered or implemented by the agency or department, and make the plans publicly available.

One state agency that has aggressively implemented Newsom’s EO is the State Water Resources Control Board which has published a 64-page Racial Equity Action Plan ([link removed]) . Meanwhile the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) has an Office of Health Equity ([link removed]) and California Office of Emergency Services (OES) has an Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ([link removed]) . Both CDPH and OES are GARE members, and both employ DEI department heads making over $200,000 in annual total compensation.

All of this spending is part of a larger, established trend in which personnel and financial resources are diverted from the core missions of public agencies. Or, to put it another way: the core missions of such agencies have been hijacked by activists and special interests that take advantage of these agencies’ leaders’ lack of discipline, their desire to appear progressive, and their inability to find relevance in their agency’s original charge.

For decades, we have witnessed a growing industry of consultants, speakers, and conference organizers who cater to the latest government agency fads. Some of these fads seem tame, even relevant: process improvement, customer service, management training, etc. Yet, few agencies can demonstrate that the dollars spent in these areas make a lasting impact on organizational efficiency, public satisfaction, or management effectiveness.

More recently, the fads have shifted to environmental activism and social justice. The result: water agencies that emphasize conservation over production (their charge), and cities and special districts adopting policies that promote equal outcomes while public safety erodes and public infrastructure deteriorates.

The fad chasing will not end so long as the public tolerates it. Residents and businesses should demand that their schools only educate, their water agencies only produce sufficient water, their sewer districts only treat the water, and their transit agencies only facilitate mobility. Until then, taxpayers will continue to fund egregious spending on activist-inspired pet programs, and our local government agencies will drift further from their original charge.

— By CPC Visiting Fellow Marc Joffe and CPC Senior Fellow Mark Moses
New Podcast ()
[link removed]


** Radio Free California #389: Escape to Alcatraz
------------------------------------------------------------

On this week's podcast with CPC president Will Swaim and CPC board member David Bahnsen: Did President Trump watch Escape to Alcatraz before declaring he’ll reopen a federal prison on the island in the San Francisco Bay? Listen now. ([link removed])

More from CPC ()


** Trump’s First 100 Days Have Shattered California’s Left-Wing Illusions
------------------------------------------------------------
However you feel about President Trump's first 100 days, one thing is clear: he has pushed aside Governor Gavin Newsom and driven the nation’s most populous state toward something approaching sanity. Read the latest National Review commentary from CPC president Will Swaim ([link removed]) .


** Saving California’s Rural Water Users
------------------------------------------------------------
The conventional wisdom in Sacramento remains committed to water rationing and the elimination of millions of acres of the state’s irrigated farmland. But there are alternative policies, equally committed to environmental health, that do not require the destruction of California’s peerless farm economy. Read the latest What's Current article by CPC's Edward Ring ([link removed]) .
SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])

============================================================

ABOUT THE CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER

The California Policy Center promotes prosperity for all Californians through limited government and individual liberty.

Learn more at ** CaliforniaPolicyCenter.org ([link removed])
.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
Copyright © 2025 California Policy Center, All rights reserved.
We send periodic updates to those who opted in on californiapolicycenter.org

Our mailing address is:
California Policy Center
18002 Irvine Blvd Ste 108
Tustin, CA 92780-3321
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]