From Center for Immigration Studies <[email protected]>
Subject Podcast Ep.: Are Sanctuary Jurisdictions a Credit Risk?
Date May 8, 2025 3:17 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fpodcast-ep-are-sanctuary-jurisdictions-a-credit-risk Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fpodcast-ep-are-sanctuary-jurisdictions-a-credit-risk)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
Are Sanctuary Jurisdictions a Credit Risk? ([link removed])
How should investors and rating agencies react?

Follow Parsing Immigration Policy on Ricochet ([link removed]) , Apple Podcasts ([link removed]) , YouTube ([link removed]) , Amazon Music ([link removed]) , Spotify ([link removed]) , Pandora ([link removed]) , or use the podcast's RSS Feed ([link removed])
Washington, D.C. (May 8, 2025) – In this week’s episode of Parsing Immigration Policy, guest host Jesscia Vaughan, the Center’s director of policy studies, discusses the intersection of immigration policy and municipal finance with Ed Grebeck, a veteran credit market risk expert.

About one-third of all municipal bonds issued in 2024 and outstanding through 2024 are from sanctuary jurisdictions, concentrated in large cities and states, such as California, New York, and Massachusetts.

Vaughan and Grebeck explore the fiscal implications of sanctuary policies and the need for comprehensive risk assessment in municipal finance. The absence of truly objective bond ratings or comprehensive risk assessments for sanctuary jurisdictions may place investors, particularly individual investors, who own a significant share of this market, at a disadvantage. Sanctuary policies can impose significant burdens on taxpayers, potentially affecting a municipality's fiscal health and its ability to meet financial obligations.

Key discussion points include:
* Why are credit ratings important?
* Do sanctuary policies compromise a city's creditworthiness?
* Why might credit rating agencies overlook political risks associated with sanctuary jurisdictions?
* How does the influx of illegal immigrants strain public resources and affect taxpayers?
* Would legislative measures, like Rep. Nancy Mace's "No Tax Breaks for Sanctuary Cities Act" ([link removed]) , address these concerns?

In the closing commentary, Vaughan presents the findings from her most recent report on sanctuary jurisdictions, identifying the states and localities that have the most egregious non-cooperation policies leading to the release of tens of thousands of criminal aliens.
Donate ([link removed])
Related Articles:

Sanctuary Map ([link removed])
Which Sanctuary Jurisdictions Have Released the Most Criminals ([link removed])
No Tax Breaks for Sanctuary Cities Act ([link removed])
Contact Details for Ed Grebeck (mailto:[email protected])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Link ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2025 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
Center for Immigration Studies
1629 K St., NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
USA

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])

This is the Center for Immigration Studies CISNews e-mail list.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis