100 days, 100 attacks on the press, and counting

The second Trump administration’s 100th day came and went this week, but the attacks on the press and transparency kept coming.

Our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker has a recap of some of the major press freedom violations it’s documented so far. We also put together a list of 100 times President Donald Trump and his team targeted the Fourth Estate. Here it is on Bluesky and X.

It’s alarming how easy it was to get to that number. Before the ink dried, there were a couple more, including Trump’s ludicrous threat to sue The New York Times for “tortious interference” for quoting legal experts on the weakness of his frivolous shakedown of a lawsuit against CBS News.

And to combat the excessive secrecy that defined this administration’s first few months, we also launched The Classified Catalog, a secrecy news tracker to help the public hold the government accountable.

Department of Justice repeals protections for journalist-source confidentiality

Attorney General Pam Bondi has rescinded her predecessor’s policy restricting federal prosecutors from forcing journalists to reveal sources.

As Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Director of Advocacy Seth Stern said, “Everyone predicted this would happen in a second Trump administration, yet politicians in a position to prevent it prioritized empty rhetoric over putting up a meaningful fight.”

Using public records to break through the secrecy of the Texas prison system

Our series highlighting local journalists using public records to speak truth to power continues with a profile of Michelle Pitcher, a reporter at the Texas Observer who focuses on criminal justice.

Public records alone can’t tell the story, though — only those living it can. “As journalists, we should be seeking the people who are willing to tell those stories because no one wants to feel like they’re shouting into the abyss. And people are shouting. People do want to talk,” she said.

Rural America needs public media

We partnered with Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and the Committee to Protect Journalists to lead a letter urging congressional leadership to reject the White House’s request to rescind funds appropriated to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

The letter explains that “the harm of these cuts will disproportionately befall rural American communities. Less densely populated parts of the country tend to have fewer options for reliable news sources. ... When people lose access to their local media, they’re forced to turn instead to national media, which are less attuned to the needs of their communities.”

WHAT WE’RE READING

THE DISSENTER

100 days of attacks on transparency and the press

FPF’s Seth Stern and Daniel Ellsberg Chair on Government Secrecy Lauren Harper joined The Dissenter’s podcast to talk about the state of press freedom and transparency 100 days into Trump 2.0.

COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS

Alarm bells: Trump’s first 100 days ramp up fear for the press, democracy

“I really think we’re just beginning to understand the impact of, for example, removing the AP’s access, and what that will do to local news organizations,” said Kirstin McCudden, Managing Editor of our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker.

REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS

Trump’s war on the press: 10 numbers from the US President’s first 100 days

RSF lays out 10 key numbers that illustrate the administration’s unconstitutional assaults on press freedom and the right to reliable information.

THE GUARDIAN

Trump v. 60 Minutes is a stunning battle for the soul of US media

“In addition to all the principled reasons to not cave to Trump, there’s also the practical one that it doesn’t work,” Stern explained to The Guardian.  “He will be right back at your door with his hands out the next day.”

THE INTERCEPT

Democrats had a shot at protecting journalists from Trump. They blew it

“Last year, Senate Democrats had a clear opportunity to make basic protections for journalists a matter of binding federal law, rather than mere policy that could be undone with a vendetta-laced memo … then Democratic leaders blew it.”

COLUMBIA JOURNALISM REVIEW

The legal battle for DOGE transparency

“More transparency means less corruption and potential for state capture. It’s an existential issue, and not one that our federal records laws or the people in the bureaucracy are equipped to deal with,” Harper told CJR.

THE WASHINGTON POST

US attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda,’ threatens nonprofit status

Practically everything Ed Martin says is nonsense, but the one thing that’s totally believable is he doesn’t know federal prosecutors don’t investigate nonprofits’ tax compliance.

Catch FPF live, today

At 1 p.m. Eastern time today, we’re hosting a remote conversation with legendary First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams, The Intercept’s general counsel David Bralow, and Kendra Albert of Albert Sellars. They’ll discuss the legal brief that The Intercept and FPF led opposing Trump’s attacks on law firms that reporters depend on for representation, as well as other press freedom concerns.

Tell us what you think

Our newsletters have a new look, bringing you the same essential press freedom content in a more dynamic and interactive format. Let us know what’s working for you — and what’s not:

[email protected]

If someone forwarded you this newsletter, please subscribe below: