John -- Opponents of voting rights have made a strong bet. They've doubled down on it the last few years, too.
Their bet was that we'd only care about certain states. That as long as we were focused on the so-called "swing states" like Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and others, that they would be free to suppress votes in states like Utah, South Dakota, Mississippi, or Kentucky. And you know what? That bet has paid off for them.
When Wisconsin tried to ban drop boxes, there was an immediate reaction and lawsuits. When South Dakota did the same? Crickets. When Texas started messing with changes to voter ID requirements, people howled. When Utah functionally suppressed the youth vote with new ID requirements? Very little response.
They've created a feedback loop: states with restrictive voting laws receive little attention because they aren't electorally competitive. But part of the reason they aren’t competitive is because their state laws prevent large segments of the population from voting.
John, we cannot afford to skip any state when it comes to protecting our fundamental right to vote. Step up and give $25 or whatever you can today and help us make every voice heard in our elections >>