From EWG Rapid Response <[email protected]>
Subject Clean water: Yes or No?
Date April 17, 2025 1:01 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Environmental Working Group
---------------------------------------

Should the Trump administration protect PFAS drinking water standards?
[[link removed]]

Friend,

Last year, we celebrated a historic win: The EPA finalized long-overdue limits on toxic “forever chemicals” known as PFAS in drinking water.

Now, the Trump administration could dismantle these hard-won protections, putting millions of Americans at risk.

Even at low levels, PFAS are linked to cancer, reproductive harm and weakened immune systems. These chemicals never break down and have been found in the blood of nearly every American.

Industry groups are fighting to overturn the EPA’s PFAS standards in court. Just this month, the agency requested another delay in the case, giving polluters more time to influence the outcome behind the scenes.

That’s why we’re asking you: Should the Trump administration protect the PFAS drinking water standards?
[[link removed]]

We say yes, because nothing is more essential to public health than clean, safe drinking water.

We have big plans for fighting PFAS pollution in 2025 and we need to hear from you. We’re aiming for 2,500 responses by midnight tonight to help us craft our plans. Can we count on you to take a quick survey? >>
[[link removed]]

Should the Trump administration protect PFAS drinking water standards?
[[link removed]]

Thanks for weighing in, friend.

– EWG Rapid Response

Donate Now
[[link removed]]

UNSUBSCRIBE [[link removed]] | MANAGE PREFERENCES [[link removed]]

EWG
1250 I Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC xxxxxx
202-667-6982 | ewg.org

Contact Us [[link removed]] | Privacy Policy [[link removed]] | Terms & Conditions [[link removed]] | Copyright © 2025, EWG. All Rights Reserved.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis