View this email in your browser ([link removed])
An update from FactCheck.org
Photo by Veronique / stock.adobe.com


** Democratic Claims on Social Security
------------------------------------------------------------

Changes at the Social Security Administration have some experts concerned. A reorganization, thousands of staffing cuts, exaggerated claims about widespread fraud and other issues could lead to administrative errors or disruptions, they say. And Democrats have been criticizing the Trump administration over these worries. But as Director Lori Robertson writes, some statements have left the wrong impression that benefits mandated by law are being cut.

There has been no proposal to do that.

“They’re setting the groundwork to ‘eliminate’ Americans’ hard-earned benefits like Social Security and Medicare all to fund tax breaks for their ultra-wealthy backers,” the Democratic National Committee claimed in a March 17 statement. Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders said the administration is “prepared to destroy Social Security,” among other programs, “in order to make themselves even richer.”

Other Democrats have raised the specter of privatization. For instance, Rep. John Larson told MSNBC: “The plan, unlike previous plans to privatize Social Security, is to scuttle the agencies themselves.”

As Lori wrote, "Most of these comments are speculative, and as other news organizations have reported, and as experts told us, there is reason to be concerned about rushed changes and false fraud claims leading to problems with Social Security. But despite those concerns, the administration hasn’t put forth any plan to privatize the SSA, nor any plan to change the amount of benefits now promised to retirees, as many of these claims suggest."

Romina Boccia, director of budget and entitlement policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, told Lori that concern is “warranted” that some of the administrative changes could affect people’s ability to apply for benefits, especially for disability benefits, which already face very long delays. But that’s different from rules set in law that determine eligibility and the size of someone’s benefits. Any changes to that would have to go through Congress.

Boccia said that conflating the two issues amounted to "fearmongering."

For more, read the full story: “Democrats Question Social Security Administration Changes in Misleading Terms ([link removed]) .”
HOW WE KNOW
In looking into some of President Donald Trump's executive orders on transgender issues, we turned to experts and the guidance from professional medical associations on transgender care. One order claimed that "medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children." But experts have told us that gender-affirming surgeries typically take place after age 18, and after a case-by-case assessment by a medical team. Guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Endocrine Society and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health recommends care at different ages. Read more: “Trump Misleads on Transgender Issues ([link removed]) .”
FEATURED FACTS
Before Trump paused some new tariffs that he unveiled on April 2, several economic groups estimated that tariffs he has announced this year could raise between roughly $2 trillion and more than $4 trillion in federal revenue over 10 years -- well short of the $6 trillion or $7 trillion that White House trade adviser Peter Navarro claimed the tariffs would bring in. Analyses also project that the tariffs will reduce the after-tax income of households by potentially thousands of dollars a year, on average. U.S. importers, who pay the tariffs, often pass at least some of those costs on to U.S. consumers through price hikes. Read more: “Independent Analyses Contradict Navarro’s $6 Trillion-Plus Tariff Revenue Estimate ([link removed]) .”

SOCIAL MEDIA POST OF THE WEEK

We've been using our social media channels to highlight our work when we spot a politician repeating a claim we have fact-checked before.

During Trump's announcement of new tariffs on April 2, he repeated a misleading claim about the Canadian government charging triple-digit tariff rates on dairy products exported from the U.S. As we said in the video below (and in our original story ([link removed]) ), there are rates that high on the books, but they would only be charged if U.S. exports exceed predetermined tariff rate quotas, which the dairy exports don’t come close to meeting.

The video gained 2.8 million views on Facebook, Instagram and Threads.

[link removed]



** Wrapping Up
------------------------------------------------------------

Here's what else we've got for you this week:
Lo que publicamos en español ([link removed]) (English versions are accessible in each story):
* Cómo combatir la desinformación ([link removed]) : La desinformación no es nada nuevo. Sin embargo, se ha vuelto omnipresente y, en algunos casos, desmentirla es más difícil y laborioso que nunca. Aquí encontrarás nuestros consejos para identificar publicaciones falsas y distorsiones de la realidad.

Do you like FactCheck.Weekly? Share it with a friend! They can subscribe here ([link removed]) .
Donate to Support Our Work ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** Threads ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** TikTok ([link removed])
** WhatsApp ( [link removed])
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2025 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
P.O. Box 58100
Philadelphia, PA 19102

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=0ef3c7bb70-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2025_02_27_04_11_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-3bd22c2453-48392213)
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=0ef3c7bb70-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2025_02_27_04_11_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-3bd22c2453-48392213)
.

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania . 202 S 36th St. . Philadelphia, Pa 19104 . USA