U.S. Naval Academy No Longer Considers Race in Admissions
The United States Naval Academy has changed its admissions
policy to eliminate the consideration of race, according to a court filing made by the Trump administration. This policy change
stems from directives, issued by President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary
Pete Hegseth, calling for the Department of Defense to eliminate any race or sex-based
preferences, including in admissions. Following these directives, the Naval Academy
Superintendent, Vice Adm. Yvette M. Davids revised the Academy’s internal guidance
to prohibit the consideration of race in admissions.
The policy shift could potentially resolve an ongoing legal
battle over the military academy’s admissions practices. In December 2023, the
Supreme Court prohibited the use of affirmative action in college
admissions. However, citing national security reasons, the Supreme Court allowed
military academies to continue to consider race in their admissions policies.
This exception led to lawsuits filed by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA). This
organization was also the lead plaintiff in the successful affirmative action case against Harvard.
In
the case against the Naval Academy, Students for Fair Admissions
argued that the Academy's use of race in admissions should be prohibited.
However, federal district court Judge Richard D. Bennett supported the Supreme
Court’s carve-out, noting that diversity in leadership has been a priority for
the military for decades, especially after historical racial unrest, such as during
the 1960s. The judge cited the importance of having an Officer Corps that represents
the diverse composition of the military and the country it defends. Despite these
efforts, there remains a significant underrepresentation of racial minorities
among officers, even though more than half of enlisted service members are racial
minorities. Bennett concluded that the Academy had shown a compelling need for
racial diversity in its officer corps to ensure national security.
While the plaintiffs argued for race-neutral alternatives to achieve diversity,
the Court found that no such alternatives would meet the government’s needs
for diversity in the Officer Corps. The ruling upheld the Naval Academy’s approach, stating it does
not use quotas or admissions tracks based solely on race. The decision was seen
as a victory for the military’s diversity efforts.
SFFA appealed the ruling and is currently awaiting a trial date.
The Trump administration has requested that the Court pause
the case for 60 days to give the administration time to discuss their most recent
filing with SFFA so that they can determine whether to continue pursuing an appeal
of a ruling that had allowed the Academy to maintain its race-conscious admissions.
SFFA also has pending lawsuits against the United States Military
Academy at West Point and the United States Air Force Academy, challenging their
race-conscious admissions policies.