strengthens U.S. & Canadian relations with authoritarian regimes in Latin America

[link removed] Share ([link removed])

[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frightsaction%2Fmedia-bias-in-covid-reporting Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frightsaction%2Fmedia-bias-in-covid-reporting)

[link removed] Forward ([link removed])

Media bias in COVID reporting strengthens U.S. & Canadian relations with authoritarian regimes in Latin America
[link removed]

It is important that FAIR.org reports on the reporters. We need much more of this to help overcome the pandemic of media mis-reporting on global issues.

While perpetuating a positive western European/ north American centric view of the world, by under reporting and misreporting on successful COVID responses in certain countries of the world, the media helps invisibilize how, for example, U.S. and Canadian policies in Latin America maintain economic, political, military relations with a number of repressive, corrupt, ‘open-for-global-business’ regimes (like Honduras and Guatemala, where Rights Action works) – regimes that have implemented some of the most harmful, repressive and regressive COVID response measures – while, at the same time, the U.S. and Canada lead on-going efforts to weaken and undermine governments in Venezuela and Nicaragua, and Cuba (for the U.S.) that have implemented successful, by all measures, COVID response policies and programs.

U.S. and Canadian policies and actions in Latin America, and the operations of numerous North American companies and investors in Latin America, are directly causing and/ or helping worsen the death toll and impact of COVID.

*** / ***
Media Downplay Global South Leadership on Covid-19
Only Westerners, it seems, are deserving of praise
By Alan Macleod ([link removed]) , June 6, 2020
[link removed]

Amid the Trump administration’s calamitous response to the Covid-19 pandemic, media have been looking to other countries for inspiration in responsible leadership during a period of crisis. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Arden ([link removed]) has been one popular pick, having capably managed to limit the damage to only 1,504 infections and 22 deaths, as of June 5.

A widely shared article in the Conversation (4/5/20 ([link removed]) ) described Ardern as putting on a “masterclass in crisis leadership.” The Washington Post (4/7/20 ([link removed]) ) characterized her government’s response as a “triumph of science and leadership.” Elsewhere, she has been praised as “the most effective leader on the planet” (Atlantic, 4/19/20 ([link removed]) ) who “should be teaching the rest of the world” (Guardian, 4/10/20 ([link removed]) ).
The Financial Times (4/19/20 ([link removed]) ) unironically anointed her “Saint Jacinda.”

Despite its obvious geographical and economic advantages, New Zealand certainly deserves praise. But less deserving have been the European countries corporate media consistently highlight as outstanding performers.

With over 185,000 cases and 8,763 deaths, Germany ([link removed]) has one of the highest per capita fatality rates in the world. Yet Chancellor Angela Merkel has drawn effusive praise as somebody who “embraces science” (Atlantic, 4/19/20 ([link removed]) ; Guardian, 4/16/20 ([link removed]) ; Financial Times, 4/3/20 ([link removed]) ). CNN (5/7/20 ([link removed]) ) proclaimed her a “global leader on coronavirus”; Vox (5/21/20 ([link removed]) ) said she’d been “praised for her clear and effective communication with her country — and the world.”

In its editorial on crisis leadership, the New York Times editorial board (4/30/20 ([link removed]) ) also praised Merkel (while attacking China for supposedly covering up ([link removed]) the outbreak). They highlighted and applauded the leadership of several other countries, including Denmark, Norway and Finland. Amazingly, the editorial also singled out and commended Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, whose inept response has led to Italy having the third-highest number of deaths in the world at the time of its publication.

There was far less praise for leaders in the Global South. Indeed, the only one mentioned by name was Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen, and this was primarily because she “sent millions of face masks to the United States and Europe”—although with 443 total cases ([link removed]) and only seven deaths, Taiwan has had a far more enviable record on Covid-19 than most of the countries featured in the editorial.

True Asian leadership, according to the Times editorial board, is helping white people, apparently.


Time soon told that Sweden’s coronavirus plan was giving it the highest death rate in the world (New York Times, 5/15/20 ([link removed]) ).

The New York Times (5/15/20 ([link removed]) ) also published an article praising Sweden’s “more measured approach” to the virus, which essentially involved keeping most businesses open and carrying on more or less as normal. Maud Cordenius wrote that the “aggressive bombast” other countries have used “would not resonate” in Sweden.

“Time will tell if my country’s coronavirus plan was wise,” she concluded. That time was five days. On May 20, Sweden became the country with the highest ([link removed]) Covid-19 death rate per capita in the world, 50% worse than even the US (FAIR.org, 4/30/20 ([link removed]) , 5/27/20 ([link removed]) ).

The problem with much of the reporting focusing on rich, developed countries where media have foreign correspondents is that it ignores often superior responses to the virus from much of the Global South, countries that have nothing like the resources of advanced Western states.

Cuba has successfully bent its curve ([link removed]) downwards, and has sent medical staff to dozens of countries around the world (FAIR.org, 4/14/20 ([link removed]) , 5/31/20 ([link removed]) ), including to crisis-struck Italy, held up as a model of leadership.

The Indian state of Kerala, extremely poor by international standards, recorded its first coronavirus case a month before New Zealand. Yet an impressive feat ([link removed]) of organization from local authorities has limited ([link removed]) the outbreak to just 1,588 cases and 14 deaths.

Vietnam was hit by COVID-19 even earlier than Kerala, yet the entire country mobilized against the threat in a manner oft-compared ([link removed]) to the struggle against the US military during the war. Whole towns were quarantined after a single confirmed case. Citizens have their temperature constantly checked in public buildings and transit hubs like bus stations. Food is provided to anyone self-isolating to make sure nobody needs to endanger themselves or others by leaving their homes. They have also created and mass-produced test kits, all costing less than ([link removed]) $25 each, and giving results in 90 minutes, exporting them around the world. To date, Vietnam has still to record a single death.

But when commenting on Vietnam at all, media tend to brush off the country’s success as not down to leadership or the nationwide determination to stop the pandemic, but to its authoritarian government (e.g. NPR, 4/16/20 ([link removed]) ; BBC, 5/15/20 ([link removed]) ). Foreign Policy (5/12/20 ([link removed]) ), for instance, published an article called “Vietnam’s Success Is Built on Repression,” which informed readers that Vietnamese authorities digitally track citizens. Wow—imagine living in a country where security services surveil your phone and social media ([link removed]) ! (For more on Vietnam,
see FAIR.org, 5/15/20 ([link removed]) .)

The problem, for corporate media, is the orientation of these governments; Vietnam, Cuba and Kerala are all overtly Communist. A system media has been insisting cannot work
(FAIR.org, 2/8/19 ([link removed]) , 2/3/20 ([link removed]) , 3/6/20 ([link removed]) ) cannot easily be praised, so it is ignored or denigrated.

Don’t expect to see any fawning articles declaring Raul Castro a saint, or wishing the “inspirational” Nguyễn Phú Trọng were president of the United States any time soon.

Perhaps the only country that moved quicker than Vietnam was Mongolia, which shut down schools, universities and other public buildings and restricted border crossings in January ([link removed]) , before any cases had even been found. Throughout February, the country was doing what we now wish we had done: stockpiling PPE, procuring test kits and cancelling public events. To date, it has still yet to record a single in-country transmission, the only cases detected coming internationally.

Yet corporate media ignore these examples in favor of praising white Western leaders with palatable political backgrounds.

One Asian country that has received praise is South Korea, a close US ally (Time, 4/30/20 ([link removed]) ; Business Insider, 5/2/20 ([link removed]) ; Guardian, 5/20/20 ([link removed]) ). The country was hit badly at first, but through strict surveillance and contact tracing has managed to limit the outbreak to 11,668 cases and 273 deaths, far more than Kerala, Vietnam or Mongolia.

Despite this, the Atlantic (5/6/20 ([link removed]) ) described their response as “exceptional”—something, in an Asian context at least, it clearly was not. Indeed, per capita, South Korea lost considerably more people to the virus than China, much less Taiwan, Vietnam or Mongolia.

The cold, hard fact is that, in comparison to many countries in the Global South, the West’s response has been atrocious. Even New Zealand’s performance is surpassed by a number of nations, particularly in Asia. Unfortunately, New Zealand’s response should have been the benchmark for rich, developed countries, not the exception.

However, for political reasons, many of the world’s best performers are ignored in favor of Ardern, or even far less deserving figures in Europe. A toxic mix of political expediency, ignorance and the general assumption that Western countries must know better has infected our media, leading to a pandemic of biblical proportions.

*** / ***
Rights Action’s COVID-19 Response Fund
Rights Action continues to prioritize getting emergency funds to partner group in Guatemala and Honduras. Their Covid19 response work is about saving lives. The funds we are sending are drops in a bucket, and they are important. Our work is also to contribute to discussion and hopefully empower political activism premised on the basic notion that: We are not “all in this together” / There should be no “getting back to normal”.

COVID funding report (last updated May 5, 2020)
[link removed]

Tax-Deductible Donations (Canada & U.S.)
Make check to "Rights Action" and mail to:
* U.S.: Box 50887, Washington DC, 20091-0887
* Canada: (Box 552) 351 Queen St. E, Toronto ON, M5A-1T8

Credit-Card Donations: [link removed]
e-Transfers & bank wires: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
Donations of securities: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

Go Fund Me campaign (U.S.):
[link removed]

Please share this information widely
More information: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) , www.rightsaction.org ([link removed])
Subscribe to e-Newsletter: www.rightsaction.org ([link removed])
Facebook: www.facebook.com/RightsAction.org
Twitter: @RightsAction
Instagram: [link removed]
Youtube: [link removed]

[link removed] Facebook ([link removed])
[link removed] Twitter ([link removed])
[link removed] Website ([link removed])

============================================================
Copyright © 2020 Rights Action, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you are one of our subscriptor

Our mailing address is:
Rights Action
Box 50887
20091-0887
Washington, DC 0
USA
** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]