PROTECTING THE RIGHT TO VOTE: FIGHTING BACK AGAINST THE 2025 POLL TAX
In recent years, Trump and the Republican Party have become obsessed with this idea of non-citizens voting and widespread election fraud — a nonexistent problem. Now, they’ve ramped up efforts to promote “election security” through the SAVE Act, a bill that requires every American to provide documentary proof of citizenship in order to register to vote.
The SAVE Act is flawed for a number of reasons — but chiefly, it ignores the simple fact that these items of proof don’t come free. Prices for eligible forms of ID range from $12 for a birth certificate or $42 for a REAL ID in Virginia, to $130 for a passport, to $1,385 for a certificate of citizenship. By requiring citizens to own one of these documents to register to vote, the SAVE Act effectively imposes a poll tax on the American people — something made unconstitutional under the 24th Amendment.
As detailed in an article on the history of voting rights in Virginia, the long road to expanding the right to vote beyond just white, land-owning men in the birthplace of American democracy has closely tracked whether the federal government actively protected voting rights or not. As a state legislator, I was proud to do my part to expand the right to vote, from my first bill, which made it easier to vote absentee, to sponsoring the Voting Rights of Virginia, which made our Commonwealth the first southern state to have a comprehensive voting rights act. Now, I am doing my part in Congress as a sponsor of the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.
But President Trump and House Republicans want to take us back to a time when not everyone had the equal opportunity to vote. To fight back, I began the week leading the Congressional Black Caucus’s special order hour, which highlighted the voter suppression aspects of the SAVE Act. Voter suppression is not new to the CBC: it’s our recent past. Many members of the CBC have family members impacted by Jim Crow voter suppression tactics. In some cases, members of Congress themselves experienced such discrimination. It’s our responsibility to ensure that the rest of America does not forget.
 |
 |
The SAVE Act also places obstacles in the way of the millions of women who no longer go by the maiden name on their birth certificate — as many of the documents required under the act to prove citizenship also require presenting documentation of the name change, such as a marriage license. It also makes it more difficult for active duty service members stationed away from their legal residence, the disabled and homebound to vote by effectively eliminating mail-in registration. I joined the Democratic Women’s Caucus in a press conference to highlight these impacts.
I’m committed to protecting the sacred right to vote to ensure all citizens have the ability to participate in our government by, of, and for the people. When the SAVE Act comes up for a vote on the House floor, I will be staunchly opposed.
|