From American Suppressor Association <[email protected]>
Subject Are Suppressors Covered By The Second Amendment?
Date March 19, 2025 4:15 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
** Support ASA’s Fight For Your Rights!
------------------------------------------------------------

Enter the ASA’s Faster Form 4 Raffle and you could win one of these amazing prize packages! Silencer Shop will even cover the winners’ tax stamps!
CLICK HERE TO ENTER NOW ([link removed])

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER, WIN OR CLAIM A PRIZE. SEE OFFICIAL RULES FOR DETAILS.
[link removed]

SIG SBR + SUPPRESSOR + OPTIC - MSRP $5,049
[link removed]

YHM AR-15 RIFLE + SUPPRESSOR + OPTIC - MSRP $3,789
[link removed]

S&W M&P5.7 PISTOL + GEMTECH 5.56MM SUPPRESSOR - MSRP $1,848
CLICK HERE TO ENTER NOW ([link removed])

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER, WIN OR CLAIM A PRIZE. SEE OFFICIAL RULES FOR DETAILS.


** United States v. Peterson Suppressor Case
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]

WATCH: ASA General Counsel Michael Williams sets the record straight on why U.S. Attorney Michael Simpson’s filing in USA v. Peterson ([link removed]) — that suppressors aren’t arms and aren’t protected by the Second Amendment — completely misses the mark.

BACKGROUND: In February 2025, the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in United States v. Peterson, ruling that suppressors were not "firearms" and thus not subject to Second Amendment protection.

George Peterson was the proprietor of PDW Solutions, LLC, a firearm business that he operated in part out of his home. In summer of 2022, as part of an ongoing Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) investigation, a search warrant was executed at his home. Among the items discovered was an unregistered suppressor. Peterson was indicted for possession of the unregistered suppressor under the National Firearms Act (NFA). He filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the NFA's registration framework violated the Second Amendment and that the search by the ATF violated the Fourth Amendment so the evidence obtained thereby should be suppressed.

The district court in the Eastern District of Louisiana denied both motions. Peterson appealed and the Fifth Circuit heard argument on December 4, 2024. On February 6, 2025, it issued a decision affirming the lower courts denial.
CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE UPDATE ([link removed])


** NRA Members: Don’t Forget To Vote!
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]

[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
mailto:mailto:[email protected]
[link removed]

THANKS TO OUR TIER 1 SPONSORS
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

Copyright © 2025 American Suppressor Association, All rights reserved.
You were subscribed to the newsletter from American Suppressor Association

Our mailing address is:
American Suppressor Association
6085 Lake Forrest Drive, Suite 200A
Suite 200A
Atlanta, GA 30328
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) .
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis