It’s Tuesday, the traditional day for elections and for our pause-and-consider newsletter on politics and policy. We think of it as a mini-magazine in your inbox.
AN UPDATE ON FEDERAL WORKERS
By Lisa Desjardins, @LisaDNews
Correspondent
Hello from Nebraska, where the cranes have converged, a blizzard is on the way and producer Kyle Midura and I are on the road, covering what people here think about the actions President Donald Trump has taken — and the effects seen so far.
We’ll have more about this trip in next week’s edition. (Meanwhile here is the playlist accompanying us on Interstate 80 as I write on the laptop.)
For this week, let’s talk about where things stand for federal workers and the shape of the U.S. government.
Probationary workers restored (for now)
Some 25,000 firedprobationary workers were reinstated, following two federal judges’ rulings last week. Both decisions are temporary.
The wider of the two rulings, from District Judge James Bednar, affects 18 federal agencies. Bednar ordered them to reinstate workers by Monday, for two weeks.
Many of those workers, including some I’m talking with, were immediately placed on administrative leave. Judge William Alsup, whose ruling affects six federal agencies, said that is in violation of his order and has asked for a response from the federal government.
In other words: Thousands of workers are reinstated for at least two weeks, being paid but not allowed to work while on administrative leave.
As agencies move to make larger reductions in force, many of these workers are bracing themselves to be terminated a different way, down to line.
Reductions in force
First, a reminder: These refer to significant staff reductions in federal staffing and there is a statutory process for how these must be carried out. That includes 60-day notice to workers. There are also collective bargaining agreements that apply, which the Office of Personnel Management has told agencies to ignore. (There is a 119-page document outlining this process.)
This process is just starting. Agencies had a deadline last week to submit their reductions-in-force proposals to the White House. Here are some beginning figures:
Veterans Affairs: Secretary Doug Collins told PBS News Hour in early March that the agency plans to reduce its staff some 15 percent. That is equal to more than 60,000 workers.
Internal Revenue Service: The federal tax collector aims to cut as many as 6,800 workers through a RIF. That is in addition to the thousands of probationary cuts now on hold.
A few agencies have been essentially shuttered, including USAID and the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees U.S.-funded broadcasters such as Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia.
Much of these effects are still coming to light. And court challenges continue, including as recently as today. We’ll have more in the coming weeks.
One Big Question: Democrats don’t have a majority in either chamber of Congress. What tools does the party have to fight back? NPR’s Tamara Keith and Amy Walter of the Cook Political Report with Amy Walter discuss.
AT NOAA, FEARS THAT CUTS WILL MAKE AMERICANS LESS SAFE
Watch the segment in the player above.
By Joshua Barajas
Senior Editor, Digital
Tom Di Liberto is stuck in an “in-between space.”
He was fired from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in February, about two weeks before the end of his two-year probationary period. He’s one of the thousands of federal workers who received word early this week that he’d be reinstated, as a result of a judge’s order.
Hundreds of probationary NOAA workers like Di Liberto were terminated last month. It’s unclear how many employees at the nation's leading weather and climate science agency have been reinstated. But experts within and outside the agency have warned that the downsizing, led by the Department of Government Efficiency, would put public safety at risk.
The letter Di Liberto and other NOAA workers received from the Commerce Department said they would be placed in a “paid, non-duty status.”
This meant the climate scientist and public affairs specialist would be brought back, but on paid administrative leave until ongoing litigation is settled. He would also receive back pay dated to his date of termination.
What his employment at NOAA is going to look like in the near-future remains murky.
“There's a broad level of fear across the agency about whether folks will have their jobs next week or what this potentially may mean for projects that have been going on for years and years and years about trying to protect the people in this country.”
Signs supporting the National Weather Service are seen outside its facility in Norman, Oklahoma. Photo by Adam Kemp/PBS News
NOAA is bracing for another round of possible cuts — a reported 1,029 jobs, which would amount to 10 percent of its workforce.
The job cuts have hampered operations at the National Weather Service, said Brandon Dunstan, executive vice president of the National Weather Service Employees Organization. The union represents 4,000 employees at NWS, which is under NOAA.
NWS has had to reduce the amount of data collection it does, including stopping weather balloonlaunches that gather information in the atmosphere in different locations across the country, he said.
As these reductions move forward, they “will continue to put a burden and stress on the individuals that remain, and make it more difficult to carry out our mission in the National Weather Service,” Dunstan said.
Layoffs hit FAA: How DOGE’s cutbacks at the Federal Aviation Administration could affect air safety.
THIS WEEK’S TRIVIA QUESTION
In this 1894 political cartoon, an elderly woman with a broom labeled “Spoils System” kicks out a young woman whose hat reads “Civil Service Reform” from the “Democratic Home.” Civil service reform was a key issue throughout the Gilded Age. Illustration by Louis Dalrymple, courtesy of Library of Congress
By Joshua Barajas
Senior Editor, Digital
How big the U.S. federal government ought to be is a centuries-old question.
Once Old Hickory took office in 1829, he gave many federal jobs to loyalists. Qualifications or expertise weren’t major job requirements as much as loyalty to the election-winning political party. The “spoils system” wouldn’t get reformed until decades later when the Pendleton Act, passed in 1883, established a merit-based system for federal employment.
Our question: Which U.S. president supported civil service reform and signed the Pendleton Act into law?
Send your answers to [email protected] or tweet using #PoliticsTrivia. The first correct answers will earn a shout-out next week.
Last week, we asked: When was the last time U.S. spending was funded by a continuing resolution for an entire fiscal year?
The answer: 2013. According to the Bipartisan Policy Center, a “year-long” CR has happened three times in the 21 century. Besides 2013, it happened in fiscal years 2011 and 2007.
Congratulations to our winners: John Cleveland and Brenda Radford!
Thank you all for reading and watching. We’ll drop into your inbox next week.
Want more news and analysis in your inbox?
Explore all of the PBS News' emails.