From xxxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject Militarism Is No Answer to Trump
Date March 16, 2025 12:00 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[[link removed]]

MILITARISM IS NO ANSWER TO TRUMP  
[[link removed]]


 

Gavin Rae
March 11, 2025
Transform!Europe
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ As Europe ramps up military spending in response to Trump’s
shifting policies, the continent faces rising militarism, austerity,
and the risk of further conflict. Is this the right path, or should
Europe seek a new security paradigm? _

,

 

New Transatlantic Rift

The election of Donald Trump has opened up a new rift between the
United States and the European Union
[[link removed]].
The angry exchanges between Zelenskyy and Trump in the Oval Office and
the US’s suspension of military aid to Ukraine days later,
underlined the extent to which US strategy has changed. European
politicians have lined up to condemn this shift and declare their
continued support for Ukraine. Yet despite their displays of defiance
and bravado, by pledging to hike their military spending, European
governments are doing exactly what the US President demands from them.

The Failure of Biden’s Strategy

The strategy of the former President Joe Biden was to financially and
militarily back Ukraine, whilst placing sanctions and tariffs on
Russia, in the hope that this would bring the Putin administration to
its knees. This strategy has failed and with Russia unable to inflict
a quick defeat on Ukraine the war has dragged into its fourth year,
causing huge human and material losses and the displacement of
millions of people.

Trump’s Policy Shift and Its Consequences

The decision of Trump to pull US support for Ukraine, represents a
fundamental change in policy. Rather than continue to pour resources
into the war in Ukraine, these will now be diverted towards other
goals, most importantly the US’s attempt to ‘contain’ China.
This does not signify a turn towards pacifism or isolationism in the
US, but rather a change in priorities. Connected to this is the
expectation in Washington that European NATO countries will now step
up to the plate and significantly increase their military spending. In
their opinion, European nations have had it too easy: relying on the
military backing of the USA, whilst funding their relatively well
developed welfare states. This has long been the position of the USA,
with President Barack Obama urging European governments a decade ago
to increase its defence spending and claiming that they had become
‘complacent’.
[[link removed]] The
new US Secretary of Defence, Pete Hegseth, has laid this out in clear
terms, announcing the establishment of ‘a division of labour that
maximizes our comparative advantages in Europe and Pacific
respectively’.
[[link removed]] The
USA of course will remain the dominant partner in this arrangement.

Europe’s Militaristic Response

European politicians are responding with typical grandeur and
delusion. Its leaders (from Macron to Starmer and von der Leyen to
Tusk) are making firm statements against the actions of Trump and in
solidarity with Ukraine. Politicians who have been steeped in the
certainties of the Transatlantic alliance, now find themselves caught
between shaking and biting the hand that feeds them. France and the
United Kindgodm  have tried to act alone, even announcig they may
send some troops to Ukraine. As the European NATO armies are far too
weak to provide such support, governments are now pushing for a
massive increase in military spending.

Already, between 2021 and 2024, EU member states’ total defence
expenditure, rose by more than 30%, reaching almost 2% of GDP. Defence
investments have grown at an exceptional rate, increasing by 17% in
2023 alone.
[[link removed].] The
largest increase in military spending has taken place in Poland, with
defence expenditures equalling around 4.7% of GDP this year.  Trump
has lavished praise on Poland for its high military spending, with
the Polish government in turn supporting Trump’s call for European
NATO countries to spend at least 5% of their GDP on the military.
[[link removed]]

Other European countries are obligingly following suit. The UK
government has announced its single biggest increase in defence
spending since the Cold War
[[link removed]], whilst
simultaneously introducing a new round of welfare cuts
[[link removed]].
The French President Emmanuel Macron has (completely unrealistically)
suggested that France may have to raise its military spending from
2.1% to 5% of GDP.
[[link removed]] The
German Chancellor elect, Friedrich Merz, has agreed with the Christian
Democrat’s likely coalition partner, the Social Democratic Party,
to  inject hundreds of billions of euros of extra funds into the
country’s military and exempt defence spending above 1% of  GDP
from the debt brake rules. 
[[link removed]] In
order to circumvent the uncomfortable problem of democratic
accountability, Mertz will attempt to rush this through the present
parliament before the new government is formed, as it would unlikely
achieve the required two-thirds majority in the incoming parliament.
Meanwhile, the European Commission is freeing up around €840
billion in defence spending over the next four years
[[link removed]].
This will include providing €150 billion in loans to member states
to build up pan-European capacities and activating a fiscal escape
clause to let countries spend more on defence. Austerity, it seems,
only applies to social or environmental spending, with the coffers
always open for war.

The Economic and Political Impact of Militarisation

By following Trump’s dictates, European leaders are heralding a
period of unprecedented military expansion. Nevertheless, Europe will
still be in no position to support Ukraine in a war against Russia
without the support of the USA. France and the UK have already divided
over the details of their ‘peace proposal’, knowing that without
US backing it remains worthless. Rather than help end the suffering in
Ukraine (where a majority now support peace negotiations
[[link removed]])
the rise in militarism in Europe will push the continent further
towards war whilst starving governments of resources for social and
environmental spending. Militarism goes hand in hand with austerity.
It will also mean huge guaranteed profits for those producing the
means of destruction, with the stocks of European military
corporations soaring
[[link removed]] in
anticipation of the enlarged defence budgets.

The Far-Right’s Rising Influence and the Left’s Dilemma

Whilst some on the left and centre of politics believe that they can
ride this militaristic wave, the beneficiaries will be the far-right.
They will capitalise on the left’s increasing inability to offer
answers to the deep capitalist crisis we are living through and then
take advantage of the militaristic Europe that they will inherit.
Despite divisions on the far-right over the Ukraine war, the European
far-right agree on the need to build their armies and are finding
ground with the centre-right around increasing military spending
[[link removed]].
The left must consider how Europe can survive in a new multi-polar
world
[[link removed]].
This involves recognising the situation we are in today, and putting
forward proposals for a realistic peace agreement in Ukraine, that
best protects the country’s integrity, assets and living standards.
It means seeking a new security agreement in Europe, rather than
continuous militarisation that could lead to a catastrophic war on the
continent and a possible nuclear conflict. This would require Europe
acting independently and not cowing to the demands of Trump or whoever
occupies the White House.

_Gavin Rae is a sociologist living and working in Poland. He has
written extensively on Polish politics, society and economy and on
issues relating to Central and Eastern Europe. He has had two books
published: Poland’s Return to Capitalism. From the Socialist Bloc to
the European Union and Privatising Capital. The Commodification of
Poland’s Welfare State. He is a founding member of the think-tank
Naprzód (Forward), which is an observer organisation in transform!
europe._

_transform! europe is a network of 38 European organisations from 22
countries, active in the field of political education and critical
scientific analysis, and is the recognised political foundation
corresponding to the Party of the European Left (EL). This cooperative
project of independent non-profit organisations, institutes,
foundations, and individuals intends to use its work in contributing
to peaceful relations among peoples and a transformation of the
present world._

* European Union
[[link removed]]
* Ukraine
[[link removed]]
* Militarization
[[link removed]]
* far right
[[link removed]]
* peace movement
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis