[Right now, government money is flowing. But soon the
self-appointed guardians of “fiscal responsibility” will call for
cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and SNAP, while leaving the defense
budget and large tax breaks for the wealthy intact. ]
[[link removed]]

COMING SOON: BIPARTISAN DEFICIT HAWKS CALLING FOR AUSTERITY  
[[link removed]]


 

Ari Rabin-Havt
May 12, 2020
Jacobin
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

_ Right now, government money is flowing. But soon the self-appointed
guardians of “fiscal responsibility” will call for cuts to Social
Security, Medicare, and SNAP, while leaving the defense budget and
large tax breaks for the wealthy intact. _

People wait in line to receive food donated by SOMOS, in partnership
with World Central Kitchen and Maestro Cares Foundation, on May 11,
2020 in the Elmhurst neighborhood of Queens in New York City.,
Stephanie Keith/Getty

 

Four coronavirus stimulus bills have become law, with less than 10
percent of the $3 trillion
[[link removed]]
authorized by Congress moving directly into the pockets of workers.
Instead, we got a program that purported to provide forgivable loans
to small businesses to cover their payrolls rife with institutional
corruption
[[link removed]].

Progressives received a pittance, with their priorities, such as debt
relief for students and infrastructure spending, falling by the
wayside. On the other hand, centrists and Republicans feasted at the
trough with tax breaks and other goodies
[[link removed]]
for their K Street donors.

After this spending, along with the Trump tax cuts and massive defense
spending increases, it is inevitable that within the next few months,
in particular if a Democratic administration enters the White House,
there will be loud cries for a new age of austerity. Republican
governments feel free to spend on wars and tax giveaways going for the
wealthy, powerful, and well connected, while Democratic ones try to
claim the mantle of fiscal responsibility and institute often-odious
policy restraints in order to cut the deficit.

Consider this: the entirety of the 2018 budget deficit
[[link removed]]
was comprised of the Bush and Trump tax cuts, direct costs of the wars
in Iraq and Afghanistan, and base defense increases.

The bipartisan fiscal consensus among Washington elites was fertilized
over the past few decades by Peter Peterson’s Blackstone,
private-equity fortune. His dollars were distributed to think tanks
and political institutions, with audiences in both parties fomenting
the ludicrous idea that there was an actual grassroots constituency
around cutting the deficit.

Unlike Democrats, Republicans never let deficits get in the way of the
conservative wing of their party’s ideological priorities. (See Dick
Cheney
[[link removed]]:
“Deficits don’t matter.”) Instead, they cynically used deficits
as a political weapon against moderate Democrats who melt down at the
suggestion that perhaps the Treasury Department should issue a few
more bonds so the federal government can make substantial investments
in areas outside of warfare.

Peterson is dead, but his movement lives on, and his acolytes are
preparing to wage a new war against progressive policy.

Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal
Budget, told Yahoo Finance
[[link removed]] during
the last week in April, “We should think about putting in place a
mechanism so that when GDP is back on track and employment is back on
track, we automatically go into this question of how are we . . .
going to rethink some of tax reform and rethink our spending promises,
and get them back so they are not adding trillions to the debt every
year, which is what we are on track to be doing right now.”

While ostensibly noting that countercyclical spending is necessary in
a time of crisis, MacGuineas’s organization issued a press release
condemning
[[link removed]]
effective stimulus measures such as infrastructure spending and
student debt cancelation as “unrelated pet projects” and “things
that don’t help us fight the virus or provide direct economic
relief.”

The economy is in shambles; tens of millions of people are unemployed;
our health care system is a nightmare; if people had 401(k)s, they
likely took a massive hit as the stock market crashed; and most people
don’t have enough savings to survive going without a paycheck at a
time when going to work could literally mean a contracting a deadly
virus, yet these deficit fetishists are already dismissing ideas that
would bring financial assistance to tens of millions of Americans as
“pet projects.”

While constraints on spending are being ignored now, it is guaranteed
that in a few months, a completely theoretical notion of how much the
federal government can borrow will be far more important than meeting
human needs. MacGuineas has spent decades waving the deficit flag, so
her take is expected.

The battle progressive lawmakers must wage is against centrists who
will continue to use the ruse of fiscal responsibility as a bad-faith
argument against progressive policy-making.

While it might seem off the beaten path to start fighting an esoteric
battle about the national debt as we scrape and claw for a modicum of
progressive policies in coronavirus relief bills, failing to engage
now condemns us to losing it in the future.

It does not take a crystal ball to see the trite op-eds coming in
January 2021:

“It is about making tough choices.”

“If your family ran up three trillion dollars on the credit card,
they’d have to figure out a way to pay it back.”

“This endless orgy of spending cannot continue.”

The self-appointed guardians of “fiscal responsibility” will call
for cuts to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, and housing
subsidies, while leaving defense and large tax breaks for the wealthy
and corporations intact.

Leftists and progressives need to make it clear that the era of
deficit hysteria is over, that talks of “grand bargains
[[link removed]]”
are off the table from day one, and that no cuts to benefits critical
to a family’s survival will be acceptable.

Larry Summers
[[link removed]],
who is now advising Joe Biden, called for cuts to Social Security and
Medicare at the beginning of Barack Obama’s first term. In fairness,
nowadays, even Summers has dropped
[[link removed]]
his deficit obsession, but the status quo in Washington will be for
senior members of any Democratic administration to be pushing similar
policies.

While progressives have become fairly adept at blocking Social
Security cuts, as they did during the Clinton, Bush, and Obama
administrations, defending the status quo is clearly not good enough.
(I once witnessed a confrontation in the large conference room on the
first floor of the AFL-CIO building, where a senior union office told
Summers during his tenure as a White House economist, “There are two
types of people in this world. Those who cut Social Security, and
those who are allowed in this building.”)

The current crisis reveals that anything short of a massive increase
in the social safety net is a death sentence to some of our fellow
citizens. We cannot allow the hollow whining of centrists to stand in
our way.

_Ari Rabin-Havt served as deputy campaign manager on Bernie
Sanders’s 2020 presidential campaign and deputy chief of staff in
his Senate office._

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web [[link removed]]
Submit via email
Frequently asked questions [[link removed]]
Manage subscription [[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org [[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]