From Team NDRC <[email protected]>
Subject When the Roberts Court ruled that federal courts could not place limits on partisan gerrymandering...
Date May 31, 2020 11:08 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
John -- When the Roberts Court ruled that federal courts could not place limits on partisan gerrymandering, Justice Kagan provided a forceful dissent. In truth, the conservative justices' logic was absurd.

Help us fight back by donating to our end-of-month goal, John >> [link removed]

But at the NDRC, we never depended on one court or one case to move our work forward. That's why we were able to keep pushing our multi-pronged strategy to end gerrymandering:

➔ Helping to win a ton of elections in 2019 (and one in Wisconsin in 2020!)
➔ Continuing to educate voters and leaders about the importance of fair redistricting.
➔ And now, building on our scope of work to take on Republican voter suppression.

But what happens next depends on you. Our end-of-month deadline hits at midnight -- will you help us fight for fair elections in 2020 and secure equitable maps in 2021?

>>> [link removed]

-- Team NDRC



Donate >>> [link removed]












Paid for by the National Democratic Redistricting PAC, [link removed].
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

This email was sent to [email protected].

To unsubscribe, go to:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis