Email
President Trump Sends Letter to Supreme Leader Khamenei, Urging Negotiations, Hemmati Dismissed and Zarif Steps Aside, Iran’s Short Animation “Under the Cypress” Shines at the Oscars, and More
| From | Iran Unfiltered from NIAC <[email protected]> |
| Subject | President Trump Sends Letter to Supreme Leader Khamenei, Urging Negotiations, Hemmati Dismissed and Zarif Steps Aside, Iran’s Short Animation “Under the Cypress” Shines at the Oscars, and More |
| Date | March 7, 2025 9:30 PM |
Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Iran Unfiltered - NIAC's periodic digest tracking the latest from Iran <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; text-align: center; padding: 12px 0 15px;"><a href="#" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 130px;" /> </a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #222; text-align: center; padding: 0;"><a href="[link removed]" style="display: block; mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none; padding: 0 15px;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; height: 82px; width: 505px;" /> </a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
</table>
Week of March 3, 2025 [[link removed]] | Iran Unfiltered is a digest tracking Iranian politics & society by the National Iranian American Council
* Trump’s Letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader: Uncertainty, Diplomacy, and Nuclear Concerns [[link removed]]
* Economic Crisis Sparks Political Shake-Up: Hemmati Dismissed on March 2 Amid Inflation and Currency Woes [[link removed]]
* Iran’s Short Animation “In the Shadow of the Cypress” Shines at the Oscars, Triumphing Against All Odds [[link removed]]
* Zarif Steps Aside Amid Judicial Pressure and Political Turbulence [[link removed]]
* Turkey and Iran Exchange Diplomatic Blows Amid Rising Regional Tensions [[link removed]]
* Deadly Shooting in Iranshahr: Outrage Grows as Authorities Investigate Police [[link removed]]
* Escalating Hardliner Pressure: The Hijab and Chastity Law as a Political Tool [[link removed]]
* Shooting at Labor Protest in Takab Leaves Four Municipal Workers Injured [[link removed]]
Trump’s Letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader: Uncertainty, Diplomacy, and Nuclear Concerns [[link removed]]
U.S. President Donald Trump stated that he had written a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, inviting him to negotiations . Trump, in an interview with Fox News, emphasized his preference for reaching a nuclear agreement with Iran, reiterating his longstanding position that Iran must not possess nuclear weapons.
However, conflicting reports have emerged regarding the status of this letter . While initial reports suggested that Trump had already sent the letter, an American official later told Al Jazeera that although Trump wrote the letter, it has not yet been sent. Additionally, after the news was published, Iran’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations denied receiving any such letter from Trump.
Trump reiterated in his Fox News interview, “I prefer to negotiate and reach an agreement with Iran.” He further added, “The other option is to take action because Iran cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons.”
Speaking in the Oval Office with reporters, President Trump hinted at high stakes coming to a head in the days and weeks to come. He stated, “We’re down to final moments. We’re at final moments. We can’t let them have a nuclear weapon. It’s an interesting time in the history of the world, but we have a situation with Iran that something’s going to happen very soon, very, very soon.”
“Hopefully we can have a peace deal,” Trump continued . “I’m not speaking out of strength or weakness; I’m just saying I’d rather see a peace deal than the other. But the other will solve the problem,” seemingly referring to strikes on Iran’s nuclear program.
Meanwhile, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, speaking at the sidelines of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Foreign Ministers’ meeting in Jeddah, reiterated Iran’s stance against negotiating under the maximum pressure campaign . Araghchi stated, “As long as the Trump administration continues to exert maximum pressure, Iran will not resume negotiations with the United States regarding its nuclear program.” He also emphasized, “Iran’s nuclear program cannot be destroyed through military action.”
Recent weeks have seen increasing speculation about Russia’s role as a mediator between the U.S. and Iran. The visit of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to Tehran, following his discussions with U.S. officials in Saudi Arabia, has intensified this speculation. Russian diplomatic efforts appear to be focused on reopening indirect channels for dialogue between Washington and Tehran, although no concrete plans for negotiations have been confirmed.
Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia’s top representative at international institutions in Vienna, recently acknowledged in an interview with BBC Persian that talks regarding Iran took place during negotiations in Riyadh. While he confirmed that a direct communication channel had been established, he emphasized that there were currently no definitive plans to restart nuclear negotiations. Ulyanov also warned that too much time had already been lost, stating that the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) could have been revived three years ago but the opportunity had since faded.
Parallel to diplomatic maneuvers, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has raised serious concerns over Iran’s nuclear activities . According to the IAEA, Iran now possesses enough 60% enriched uranium to produce six nuclear bombs. Furthermore, following the recent resolution passed by the IAEA against Iran three months ago, Tehran has accelerated its production of 60% enriched uranium, adding enough material each month to produce an additional bomb.
The three European signatories to the JCPOA—France, Germany, and the United Kingdom—have issued a joint statement condemning Iran’s continued nuclear advancements, citing its failure to comply with its obligations under the agreement . They have stressed that Iran’s actions have reached an unprecedented level for a country that claims to have no interest in nuclear weapons. The IAEA has also reported that Iran has refused to allow sufficient access to the agency’s inspectors, further complicating efforts to monitor its nuclear program.
During his presidency, Trump implemented a “maximum pressure” policy aimed at crippling Iran’s economy. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently reaffirmed that these sanctions were designed to collapse Iran’s oil sector and destabilize its economy. Bessent stated that Washington intended to cut Iran’s daily oil exports and dismantle its drone production capabilities.
Additionally, the U.S. has pressured Iraq to sever its energy ties with Iran, warning Baghdad against facilitating financial transactions that could help Tehran bypass sanctions . The State Department is currently reviewing all exemptions from sanctions to ensure maximum economic pressure remains in place. Despite these measures, Iran has continued to maneuver around sanctions, leveraging its financial resources in countries such as Qatar, Iraq, and Turkey.
As diplomatic tensions continue to rise, the international community faces a complex challenge. The European nations, while eager to prevent a full-scale nuclear crisis, find themselves in a difficult position amid global geopolitical shifts. Russia’s recent diplomatic outreach, particularly its proposed mediation between Iran and the U.S., has added another layer of complexity to the situation.
Meanwhile, Tehran maintains that its nuclear program is purely for peaceful purposes. However, the IAEA and Western nations remain unconvinced. The upcoming meetings of the IAEA Board of Governors will be critical in shaping the next steps regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions. With time running out before key provisions of the UN Security Council Resolution 2231 expire, many speculate that European leaders will attempt to trigger the JCPOA’s “snapback mechanism” in the months to come, which could reimpose prior United Nations Security Council resolutions on Iran.
The diplomatic landscape remains fluid, and while no party appears willing to escalate to open conflict, the risk of further deterioration in U.S.-Iran relations remains significan t. Whether through Russian mediation, European diplomatic efforts, or direct U.S.-Iran engagement, the path forward is uncertain. However, prospects for negotiations have not closed. Iran’s response to Trump’s letter, when it arrives, could prove significant in opening or closing the window for possible negotiations in the weeks and months to come.
Economic Crisis Sparks Political Shake-Up: Hemmati Dismissed on March 2 Amid Inflation and Currency Woes [[link removed]]
On March 2, members of the Iranian Parliament voted to dismiss Abdulnaser Hemmati, the Minister of Economy and Finance, after reviewing his impeachment proposal . During an afternoon session chaired by Masoud Pezeshkian, the cabinet expressed regret over not having granted Hemmati a vote of confidence. Shortly thereafter, President Rahmatollah Akrami was appointed to lead the Ministry of Economy and Finance—a role he assumed after serving as Deputy Minister of Economy, overseeing national financial supervision and treasury management.
Out of the 273 members present, 182 voted against Hemmati while only 89 supported his continuation in office . Officials cited factors such as currency fluctuations, devaluation of the national currency, an inflation crisis, and rising prices of essential goods as the primary reasons for the impeachment.
Pezeshkian, who attended the session to defend his minister, declared that the country is “at war” and noted that even Qatar, Turkey, and Iraq are withholding the return of Iran’s dollars . He explained that following the arrival of Donald Trump and the enactment of specific legislation, many of Iran’s ships were sanctioned at sea—hindering their ability to offload oil and gas. He further pointed out that although Iran holds significant dollar reserves, they are not being returned, citing the Supreme Leader’s claim that Qatar holds six billion dollars on Iran’s behalf. Similar conditions exist in Iraq and Turkey.
Pezeshian emphasized that since his government took office, the country has faced a series of challenges —from the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh amid his inauguration to crises in Gaza and Lebanon, as well as issues stemming from Trump’s policies. He added that, in times of war, assigning blame will not resolve the underlying problems. He recalled that the Supreme Leader has repeatedly described the sanctions and economic pressures as an “economic war.”
During his address, Pezeshkian revealed that he initially supported negotiations with the United States but that he abandoned that position when the Supreme Leader announced his opposition . He also apologized on behalf of the government for power outages and energy issues, stating, “I apologize once again from this podium to our dear citizens. I never intended for us to burn diesel or cut off electricity to our people and factories.” He warned that without these measures, gas supplies might have been halted during the winter months. Pezeshkian further observed that managerial problems cannot be resolved in six months, noting that his ministers have yet to appoint the appropriate managers.
On Pezeshkian’s pivot on U.S. negotiations, foreign policy and political commentator Diako Hosseini outlined concerns that such a position could be harmful to Iran over the long term. He stated “Preparing to negotiate with the United States, with all the obstacles and uncertainties surrounding it, is not wise compared to last year, but it is wise compared to next year; unless Iran expects economic growth, international influence, and higher national currency value, as well as lower inflation, budget deficits, and instability, for next year.”
Opposing the impeachment, Mohammad Ghasem Osmani from Boukan argued, “Only this government is facing such exceptional conditions, and today we must support it rather than hinder it .” In contrast, Jabbar Kochakinajad, a member of the Budget and Planning Commission and a supporter of the impeachment, contended, “This impeachment, driven by the minister’s poor performance, will ultimately benefit the government.” Meanwhile, Ruhollah Izadkhah of Tehran remarked, “We have no personal issues with Hemmati, but we stand against an economy that is overly dependent. Is it too late to prevent an economic collapse?”
Some parliamentarians also referenced text messages sent by Saeed Jalili’s faction – dubbed the shadow government faction to underscore their commitment to undermining the administration – urging members to vote in favor of impeachment . Osmani claimed that Hemmati had “removed a thousand instances of rent-seeking from the profiteers’ clutches” and noted that messages circulated among members stating, “You are not a man if you do not vote for impeachment.” Gholamreza Tajgardoon, head of the Budget and Planning Commission, confirmed that similar messages were indeed sent. Supporters of
Defending himself, Hemmati stated, “The increase in the exchange rate and the conversion rate of the Rial to the dollar (approximately 91 to 92 thousand Toman) does not reflect the real market price but is driven by inflationary expectations .” He added, “Underlying inflation is one of the country’s most significant issues; however, the inflation rate in Iran has decreased. In this month last year, inflation was 42% , and it has now dropped to 32% . Yes, 32% is still high, but it is an improvement compared to 42 or 55%.”
Hemmati further explained that factors such as events in Syria and Lebanon, the loss of major resistance leaders, the rise of Trump, and essentially the declaration of an outright economic war were additional contributors to the exchange rate fluctuations . Addressing the parliament, he stated, “I will not discuss matters that might please the enemy,” referring to what he described as the “terrible misalignment” in the banking sector. He noted, “Over the past seven years, 10 million people have fallen below the poverty line; we are well aware of this, and based on our capabilities, we are moving forward.” Furthermore, the Minister of Economy stressed that despite what has been characterized as an “economic war” waged by foreign countries against Iran, the country is effectively being run by the resilience of its people, and he attributed the current growth in liquidity to longstanding issues rooted in the past.
IRNA, the official news agency of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in reaction to the pressure exerted on the government, described Mr. Hemmati’s impeachment as a “harm to unity” in one of its headlines. Itt stated that “It is the duty of the parliament to supervise the performance of the government, but turning it into a partisan and subjective dispute is not only not beneficial for our country, but also fundamentally damaging.”
Iran’s Short Animation “In the Shadow of the Cypress” Shines at the Oscars, Triumphing Against All Odds [[link removed]]
Representing Iran at this year’s Oscars, the film “In the Shadow of the Cypress” clinched the Best Short Animation award by telling the moving story of a war survivor in a distinctive way. The film explores the intricate life of a small family—a father battling post-accident challenges and his injured daughter who remains at his side. Through their wordless interactions, the film powerfully conveys the deep suffering both endure.
For Hossein Molayemi and Shirin Soohani, participating in the Oscars was not without its hurdles . They encountered significant difficulties in obtaining a U.S. visa—spending several days in Oman awaiting an interview appointment at the U.S. Embassy. Ultimately, their visas were issued just one day before the ceremony, allowing them to arrive in Los Angeles a few hours before the event began. In their acceptance speech, Soohani and Molayemi noted their earlier disappointment at seemingly not being able to attend, only to arrive with just hours to spare to receive the award.
Molayemi and Soohani said that just producing the film “under the extraordinary circumstances of our country is a miracle.” They dedicated their award to all of those fighting both inner and outer battles, and fellow Iranians who are still suffering.
The animation was meticulously produced using hand-drawn 2D and frame-by-frame techniques, methods that are recognized as some of the most challenging in the animation industry. The directors disclosed that while creating this 20-minute film, they faced serious financial constraints and a shortage of manpower. Nonetheless, their determination ensured the film’s timing, continuity, and narrative rhythm were maintained, and its impressive sound design and musical score have won widespread acclaim from critics.
Overcoming stiff competition from films like the French short animation “Yuck” and the Japanese anime “Magic Candies”, “In the Shadow of the Cypress” has rekindled hopes for a renaissance in Iranian short animation, reminding audiences of the nation’s storied past in the field . Experts now believe this success could signal a turning point for the industry in Iran.
Both artists have been vocal in their criticism of the prolonged visa process and the impact of U.S. sanctions on Iran . In an interview, Hossein Molayemi stated:
“The most important problem is that we have been living under sanctions for years. Our national currency is devaluing and shrinking every day. Ultimately, the key issue is the economic crisis and the mental strain that we Iranians suffer because of it.”
Zarif Steps Aside Amid Judicial Pressure and Political Turbulence [[link removed]]
Mohammad-Javad Zarif, the former Iran’s Foreign Minister and current strategic deputy under Masoud Pezeshkian, has submitted his resignation to the President after a meeting with the head of the judiciary, Gholam Hossein Mohseni Ejei. In the meeting, Ejei advised Zarif to step aside. However, according to government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani, his resignation has not yet been accepted by President Pezeshkian.
Initial reports of his resignation emerged from domestic media, including IRNA, and were later confirmed by Zarif on social media . In Sunday evening post, Zarif stated:
“Yesterday, at the invitation of the honorable head of the judiciary, I met with him. Given the country’s current state, he advised that, to ease pressure on the government, I should return to academia. I accepted immediately, as I have always wished to be a helper rather than a burden.”
In his follow-up statement, he intentionally used the phrase “stepping aside” rather than “resigning,” explaining:
“I hope that by stepping aside, excuses for launching attacks against the will of the people and the government’s success will be nullified. I remain proud to support the esteemed Dr. Pezeshkian and wish him and all other true servants of the people the very best.”
In response to Mr. Zarif’s resignation and Mr. Hemmati’s dismissal, Mohammad Reza Aref, the First Deputy of the President, engaged in indirect criticism of the administration’s opponents, stating, “The approach of the 14th government is one of commitment to unity, even though we have noticed some instances of unkind behavior.”
Although this is not the first time Zarif has resigned, his public explanation this time is notably different . His resignation, announced on Sunday evening, coincided with a dramatic shift in parliament. On the same day, the Islamic Consultative Assembly impeached Abdulnaser Hemmati, the Minister of Economy and Finance, in a no-confidence vote—182 votes in favor against 89 votes opposed out of 273 members.
Zarif served as Iran’s Foreign Minister for eight years under President Hassan Rouhani, playing a central role in the nuclear negotiations that led to the JCPOA, a deal that attracted sharp criticism from conservative factions . Despite ongoing verbal attacks and criticism, following his electoral victory last year, Dr. Pezeshkian appointed him as his strategic deputy. In recent months, Zarif has faced mounting pressure from various quarters, including backlash from hardline right-wing groups over his comments on hijab.
Regarded as a symbol by advocates for improved relations with the West, Zarif’s decision to step aside underscores the growing influence of opponents of negotiations with the United States within the Islamic Republic . During the Hemmati impeachment session, Dr. Pezeshkian subtly noted that while Ayatollah Khamenei opposes U.S. negotiations, he had previously personally supported dialogue—though ultimately, he has accepted the Supreme Leader’s stance. If the resignation holds, the Pezeshkian government will move forward without the direct involvement of one of Iran’s most accomplished diplomats – and one who has served as a lightning rod for hardline attacks.
Turkey and Iran Exchange Diplomatic Blows Amid Rising Regional Tensions [[link removed]]
Amid escalating diplomatic tensions, Iran and Turkey’s foreign ministries summoned their respective diplomats after Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan accused Tehran of destabilizing actions in the region . In an interview with Al Jazeera’s Qatar channel, Fidan criticized Iran’s reliance on paramilitary groups to maintain influence in Iraq and Syria, arguing that the costs outweigh the gains. He warned that inciting unrest in a third country could prompt retaliation, as other states might support opposition groups domestically. Fidan also stressed that no country—Arab, Turkish, Kurdish, or Iranian—should seek to dominate the region.
Fidan, who led Turkey’s intelligence agency for nearly eight years, claimed he had previously raised these concerns with Qassem Soleimani, the late commander of the Quds Force, warning that Iran’s interference could provoke countermeasures.
In response, Esmaeil Baghaei, spokesperson for Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, accused the U.S. and Israel of covert manipulation in the region. He stated: “It is clear that, as the Turkish Foreign Minister put it, ‘the region must be freed from the culture of one country seeking domination over others; neither Arabs, nor Turks, nor Kurds, nor Iranians—none should seek to dominate, disturb, or threaten the other.’ But what about Israel?”
Baghaei further argued that after Damascus fell to Turkish-backed forces, Israel launched extensive attacks on Syria’s military, destroying over 90 percent of its facilities, reoccupying the Golan Heights, and seizing more Syrian territory.
Baghaei insisted that Iran has not pursued regional ambitions for the past five decades, but has instead focused on supporting the Palestinian cause. He also pointed to Iran’s role in combating ISIS, opposing the coup in Turkey, and advocating for the disarmament of the PKK as proof of its commitment to regional stability.
Following Fidan’s remarks, Iran summoned the Turkish ambassador on March 3, although the Iranian Foreign Ministry’s statement avoided using the word “summon,” instead referring to it as a “meeting.”
According to the Iranian Foreign Ministry, Mahmoud Heydari, the ministry’s director general for the Mediterranean and Eastern Europe region, warned Turkish Ambassador Hicabi Kirlangic that “false statements and unrealistic analyses that could strain bilateral relations should be avoided, given the two nations’ common interests and the sensitive regional situation.”
On March 4, Turkey retaliated by summoning Iran’s chargé d’affaires in Ankara. Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesperson Oncu Keceli criticized Iranian officials for making increasingly public attacks on Turkey, stating: “Foreign policy should never be used for domestic political purposes. We prefer to deliver critical messages directly, which is what we did today.” Keceli emphasized that despite tensions, Turkey values its relationship with Iran.
These developments come as Turkey has expanded its own regional influence. Turkey’s support was pivotal in Azerbaijan’s victory in the Caucasus and in the ouster of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria. Despite these frictions, a rare visit by Turkey’s intelligence chief to Tehran last month, along with a recent phone call between Fidan and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, highlights ongoing high-level diplomacy between the two nations.
Deadly Shooting in Iranshahr: Outrage Grows as Authorities Investigate Police [[link removed]]
A tragic shooting in Iranshahr has led to the death of a five-year-old child, Youssef Shahli-Bar, and the severe injury of his pregnant mother, who later lost her unborn child. The incident, which occurred on the night of February 24, has triggered widespread public outcry, an official investigation, and the arrest of several security personnel.
According to Iranian MP Rahmadel Bamari, the shooting happened during a car chase. He stated that several individuals suspected of involvement have been arrested, based on a report from the provincial judiciary. However, conflicting reports have emerged. Baluchi human rights activists and eyewitnesses claim the attack was carried out by special police forces, while Mohammadreza Eshaqi, the police commander of Sistan and Baluchestan, denies this, attributing the shooting to unknown assailants.
Following public outrage, the provincial prosecutor’s office launched an investigation, leading to the arrest of nine police officers allegedly linked to the shooting. Zahedan’s prosecutor, Mehdi Shams-Abadi, confirmed that those responsible will face legal consequences. The killing has drawn strong condemnation, including from Molavi Abdulhamid, the Sunni cleric of Zahedan, who urged authorities to swiftly prosecute those responsible. He criticized the reckless use of gunfire during police chases, stating: “If a suspect escapes, it is better than innocent people being killed by gunfire.”
Meanwhile, Youssef’s family is demanding transparency and justice. In a widely circulated video, his uncle, Reza Shahli-Bar, emphasized that their only demand is to uncover the truth. Reports suggest that the family has been pressured by security forces to deny claims that the Tactical Police Unit was responsible. In videos from the hospital, Youssef’s father can be heard expressing frustration over the absence of a surgeon, raising separate concerns about medical shortages in Sistan and Baluchestan. The region has long suffered from inadequate healthcare facilities, which has only further fueled public frustration.
The funeral of Youssef Shahli-Bar was attended by grieving relatives and locals, with human rights organizations calling for accountability. While the official narrative remains disputed, authorities claim that a special police investigation team has been dispatched to Iranshahr. Despite these assurances, activists continue to question whether full justice will be served.
The incident has reignited concerns about law enforcement practices in Sistan and Baluchestan, where citizens have repeatedly been killed during high-speed police chases. Calls for police reform and accountability continue to grow as the country watches how authorities handle this deeply troubling case.
Escalating Hardliner Pressure: The Hijab and Chastity Law as a Political Tool [[link removed]]
The recent impeachment of Abdolnasser Hemmati and the forced resignation of Mohammad Javad Zarif mark a significant escalation in the hardliners’ campaign against President Masoud Pezeshkian’s administration . Now, a new development—a letter signed by 209 members of Parliament demanding the enforcement of the controversial Hijab and Chastity Law—further underscores this growing pressure. While officially framed as a response to cultural concerns, the letter is widely perceived as another calculated effort to tighten control over Pezeshkian’s government.
President Pezeshkian emphasized today that he cannot enforce the Hijab and Chastity law because it creates problems for the people, and he will not stand against the people.
The passage of the Hijab and Chastity Law has intensified debates across Iran. The law, consisting of 74 articles, mandates strict enforcement of hijab compliance in both public and private spheres. It has faced widespread criticism from legal experts, political figures, activists, and the general public for infringing on individual freedoms, prioritizing ideology over pressing economic concerns, and risking further societal division.
The controversy surrounding the hijab law is deeply intertwined with the broader struggle for women’s rights in Iran . The Woman, Life, Freedom movement, which emerged in September 2022, was ignited by the tragic killing of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman who died in police custody after being arrested by the morality police for allegedly violating Iran’s strict dress code. Her death sparked nationwide protests, shaking the foundations of the Iranian political system and intensifying calls for greater personal freedoms and government accountability. The movement saw widespread participation from women, students, and activists, leading to an unprecedented challenge to the state’s control over social and cultural policies. In the wake of these protests, the Iranian government has sought to reassert its authority through increased surveillance, harsher penalties, and renewed legislative measures like the Hijab and Chastity Law.
During a parliamentary session on March 4, MP Amir Hossein Bankipour addressed the chamber, framing the impeachment and resignation of key officials as victories against “illegal appointments and flawed economic policies.” He further emphasized that Parliament was responding to “the cultural demands of the people” by urging immediate enforcement of the Hijab and Chastity Law.
The letter, addressed to Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, presents the hijab issue as a matter of national security, alleging that foreign influences—including “Zionist regimes and Western media networks”—are fueling “moral corruption” in Iran . The signatories argue that failing to enforce the law would embolden those seeking to dismantle Iran’s cultural fabric.
Observers interpret this move as part of a broader hardline strategy to weaken Pezeshkian’s government . The removal of Hemmati and Zarif—both seen as moderate or pragmatic figures—has now given way to an intensified focus on cultural and social policies as a means of exerting control. The renewed push for the Hijab and Chastity Law serves as a convenient instrument in this power struggle.
A parliamentary source speaking to Khabar Online noted that “attacks on Pezeshkian’s government are being orchestrated on multiple fronts—one day it’s economic leadership, another day it’s cultural policies, and tomorrow it will be another minister’s turn.” This ongoing campaign suggests a deliberate effort to keep the government on the defensive and obstruct any reform efforts that might challenge hardliner dominance. Complicating the issue, the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) had previously put enforcement of the Hijab and Chastity Law on hold, triggering backlash from hardliners. In response, conservative factions have launched media campaigns and parliamentary maneuvers to contest the SNSC’s authority on the matter.
Saeed Jalili, an influential hardliner and SNSC member, publicly challenged the council’s decision, claiming that “no such resolution exists” to halt the law’s enforcement . His allies in Parliament and conservative activist circles have echoed this stance, portraying the delay as an affront to the legislative process.
However, Speaker Ghalibaf appeared to validate the SNSC’s authority when, on February 3, he stated publicly that “if the Supreme National Security Council determines that a law’s enforcement could lead to tension, it has the authority to suspend it.” This directly contradicts the claims of hardliners advocating for immediate implementation. MP Mehrdad Goodarzvand Chigini of Rudbar reinforced this position, citing Article 176 of the Constitution to emphasize that SNSC decisions take precedence over parliamentary rulings in matters of national security. He urged his colleagues to uphold the integrity of Parliament by avoiding unconstitutional demands.
According to ILNA, Goodarzvand Chigini criticized MPs for acting on misinformation, stating, “Some representatives wrongly concluded that the SNSC had no ruling on the hijab issue based on unverified reports.” He further called on Speaker Ghalibaf to address concerns from all factions and prevent Parliament from becoming a battleground for political infighting.
The intensifying hardliner push for the hijab law suggests a broader strategy to weaken Pezeshkian’s administration by creating a multi-front challenge . The current battle over this law may foreshadow more aggressive efforts to paralyze the government’s policymaking, particularly as future elections approach.
Meanwhile, Pezeshkian himself has expressed skepticism about the feasibility of enforcing the law. In a televised interview last December, he stated, “As an executive body, we face many unanswered questions about the feasibility of implementing this law. We must ensure that any policy we enforce strengthens societal unity rather than deepening divisions.” He criticized aspects of the law, including fines imposed on ride-share drivers for their passengers’ attire, warning that such measures would exacerbate public grievances.
His cautious stance contrasts sharply with that of judiciary chief Gholamhosseini Mohseni Ejei, who recently insisted that “the law must be implemented without hesitation.” During a parliamentary session, Ejei remarked that “any enacted law must be upheld, even if modifications or clarifications are later deemed necessary.”
The hardliner campaign against Pezeshkian’s government appears to be escalating, using both legislative and public opinion tactics to pressure the administration . By reviving the hijab debate at a time when economic concerns dominate public discourse, conservatives seem intent on diverting attention while simultaneously consolidating their influence.
The law has also sparked significant public dissent. The hashtag “ابلاغ نکن” (“Do not enforce”) has gained traction on Iranian social media, with many urging Pezeshkian to refuse to implement the law. Critics argue that enforcing the law could alienate the youth, deepen societal fractures, and overshadow pressing economic concerns. Legal experts and activists have warned of its far-reaching implications, with some describing it as a “grotesque display of authoritarianism.”
Whether Pezeshkian can navigate this challenge without making significant concessions remains to be seen . However, one thing is certain: the struggle over Iran’s political and cultural future is far from over.
Shooting at Labor Protest in Takab Leaves Four Municipal Workers Injured [[link removed]]
A shooting incident during a labor protest by municipal service workers in Takab, West Azerbaijan has left four protesting workers injured, with various sources offering conflicting accounts of the circumstances of the incident. The protesting workers had gathered in front of the City Council building to demand their overdue wages.
The governor of Takab, Rouhollah Mohammadian, announced in a statement to the IRNA news agency that the injured workers had been discharged from Imam Ali Hospital after receiving medical treatment . The protest was part of an ongoing demonstration by municipal workers that had been going on for several weeks. On Monday, March 3, a group of municipal service workers gathered in the municipal compound to protest several months of unpaid wages. Workers had previously voiced their concerns in a video from a protest five weeks earlier, urging City Council members to focus on securing their overdue wages instead of impeaching the mayor. Eventually, the Takab City Council removed the mayor from office and appointed Mohammad Baqer Rostami as interim mayor on March 3.
According to the human rights news agency Hrana, labor activists reported that law enforcement officers intervened in the protest, leading to violent clashes and gunfire . As a result, four workers sustained injuries. However, Takab’s governor offered a different account, claiming that a security officer fired warning shots in the air in a “safe area” to maintain security and protect himself. He stated that “the bullet ricocheted off the ground, causing injuries to the workers’ legs.”
Mohammadian also confirmed that legal proceedings are underway, stating, “A case has been opened regarding the incident, and investigations are being conducted by the relevant authorities . Those responsible will be dealt with according to the law, regardless of their position.”
ILNA news agency, also reported on the incident, citing a labor source in Takab, indicating that shooting was “unintentional” and occurred after a City Council member called law enforcement to disperse the protest . The labor source told ILNA, “As security forces arrived at the scene, one of the officers cocked his weapon. In response, a worker, fearing the officer’s actions, intervened. A shot was fired, hit the ground, and shrapnel from the bullet struck several workers.”
Labor activists identified the injured workers as Amir Raha, Maqsood Ghorbanpour, Iraj Moradi, and Hamid Navidi . Last year, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), based in Brussels, ranked Iran’s labor conditions as “red” in its annual report. This classification indicates that there are no guaranteed rights for labor unions or workers’ collective actions in the country.
Support NIAC's important work by making a contribution today.
Donate → [[link removed]]
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; text-align: center; padding: 60px 30px 45px;">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="35%"> </td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td width="35%"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; border-top: 1px solid #000; color: #000; padding: 30px 30px 10px; text-align: center;"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; color: #000; padding: 0 30px;">
<p><span style="display: block; font-family: Arial, sans-serif !important; font-size: 18px; font-weight: 700; mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1.2;">Receive this email from a friend? <a href="[link removed]" style="color: #002b49;">See previous issues and/or sign up here</a>.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; color: #000; padding: 0 30px 20px;"><span style="display: block; font-family: Arial, sans-serif !important; font-size: 14px; mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1.7;">This email was sent to [email protected] because you signed up to receive the latest Iran Unfiltered newsletter in your inbox. If you don't want to receive this newsletter in the future, we'd hate to see you go but you can <a href="[link removed]" style="color: #002b49;">manage your subscription and unsubscribe here</a>. Iran Unfiltered is a weekly digest tracking Iranian politics & society from the National Iranian American Council, a 501(c)3 grassroots organization. </span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; padding: 0 30px 30px;"><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="display:block"><span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif !important"><span style="line-height:1.2">© 2020 National Iranian American Council | PO Box 65439 | Washington, DC 20035</span></span></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; text-align: center; padding: 12px 0 15px;"><a href="#" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 130px;" /> </a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #222; text-align: center; padding: 0;"><a href="[link removed]" style="display: block; mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none; padding: 0 15px;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; height: 82px; width: 505px;" /> </a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
</table>
Week of March 3, 2025 [[link removed]] | Iran Unfiltered is a digest tracking Iranian politics & society by the National Iranian American Council
* Trump’s Letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader: Uncertainty, Diplomacy, and Nuclear Concerns [[link removed]]
* Economic Crisis Sparks Political Shake-Up: Hemmati Dismissed on March 2 Amid Inflation and Currency Woes [[link removed]]
* Iran’s Short Animation “In the Shadow of the Cypress” Shines at the Oscars, Triumphing Against All Odds [[link removed]]
* Zarif Steps Aside Amid Judicial Pressure and Political Turbulence [[link removed]]
* Turkey and Iran Exchange Diplomatic Blows Amid Rising Regional Tensions [[link removed]]
* Deadly Shooting in Iranshahr: Outrage Grows as Authorities Investigate Police [[link removed]]
* Escalating Hardliner Pressure: The Hijab and Chastity Law as a Political Tool [[link removed]]
* Shooting at Labor Protest in Takab Leaves Four Municipal Workers Injured [[link removed]]
Trump’s Letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader: Uncertainty, Diplomacy, and Nuclear Concerns [[link removed]]
U.S. President Donald Trump stated that he had written a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, inviting him to negotiations . Trump, in an interview with Fox News, emphasized his preference for reaching a nuclear agreement with Iran, reiterating his longstanding position that Iran must not possess nuclear weapons.
However, conflicting reports have emerged regarding the status of this letter . While initial reports suggested that Trump had already sent the letter, an American official later told Al Jazeera that although Trump wrote the letter, it has not yet been sent. Additionally, after the news was published, Iran’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations denied receiving any such letter from Trump.
Trump reiterated in his Fox News interview, “I prefer to negotiate and reach an agreement with Iran.” He further added, “The other option is to take action because Iran cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons.”
Speaking in the Oval Office with reporters, President Trump hinted at high stakes coming to a head in the days and weeks to come. He stated, “We’re down to final moments. We’re at final moments. We can’t let them have a nuclear weapon. It’s an interesting time in the history of the world, but we have a situation with Iran that something’s going to happen very soon, very, very soon.”
“Hopefully we can have a peace deal,” Trump continued . “I’m not speaking out of strength or weakness; I’m just saying I’d rather see a peace deal than the other. But the other will solve the problem,” seemingly referring to strikes on Iran’s nuclear program.
Meanwhile, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, speaking at the sidelines of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Foreign Ministers’ meeting in Jeddah, reiterated Iran’s stance against negotiating under the maximum pressure campaign . Araghchi stated, “As long as the Trump administration continues to exert maximum pressure, Iran will not resume negotiations with the United States regarding its nuclear program.” He also emphasized, “Iran’s nuclear program cannot be destroyed through military action.”
Recent weeks have seen increasing speculation about Russia’s role as a mediator between the U.S. and Iran. The visit of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to Tehran, following his discussions with U.S. officials in Saudi Arabia, has intensified this speculation. Russian diplomatic efforts appear to be focused on reopening indirect channels for dialogue between Washington and Tehran, although no concrete plans for negotiations have been confirmed.
Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia’s top representative at international institutions in Vienna, recently acknowledged in an interview with BBC Persian that talks regarding Iran took place during negotiations in Riyadh. While he confirmed that a direct communication channel had been established, he emphasized that there were currently no definitive plans to restart nuclear negotiations. Ulyanov also warned that too much time had already been lost, stating that the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) could have been revived three years ago but the opportunity had since faded.
Parallel to diplomatic maneuvers, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has raised serious concerns over Iran’s nuclear activities . According to the IAEA, Iran now possesses enough 60% enriched uranium to produce six nuclear bombs. Furthermore, following the recent resolution passed by the IAEA against Iran three months ago, Tehran has accelerated its production of 60% enriched uranium, adding enough material each month to produce an additional bomb.
The three European signatories to the JCPOA—France, Germany, and the United Kingdom—have issued a joint statement condemning Iran’s continued nuclear advancements, citing its failure to comply with its obligations under the agreement . They have stressed that Iran’s actions have reached an unprecedented level for a country that claims to have no interest in nuclear weapons. The IAEA has also reported that Iran has refused to allow sufficient access to the agency’s inspectors, further complicating efforts to monitor its nuclear program.
During his presidency, Trump implemented a “maximum pressure” policy aimed at crippling Iran’s economy. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently reaffirmed that these sanctions were designed to collapse Iran’s oil sector and destabilize its economy. Bessent stated that Washington intended to cut Iran’s daily oil exports and dismantle its drone production capabilities.
Additionally, the U.S. has pressured Iraq to sever its energy ties with Iran, warning Baghdad against facilitating financial transactions that could help Tehran bypass sanctions . The State Department is currently reviewing all exemptions from sanctions to ensure maximum economic pressure remains in place. Despite these measures, Iran has continued to maneuver around sanctions, leveraging its financial resources in countries such as Qatar, Iraq, and Turkey.
As diplomatic tensions continue to rise, the international community faces a complex challenge. The European nations, while eager to prevent a full-scale nuclear crisis, find themselves in a difficult position amid global geopolitical shifts. Russia’s recent diplomatic outreach, particularly its proposed mediation between Iran and the U.S., has added another layer of complexity to the situation.
Meanwhile, Tehran maintains that its nuclear program is purely for peaceful purposes. However, the IAEA and Western nations remain unconvinced. The upcoming meetings of the IAEA Board of Governors will be critical in shaping the next steps regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions. With time running out before key provisions of the UN Security Council Resolution 2231 expire, many speculate that European leaders will attempt to trigger the JCPOA’s “snapback mechanism” in the months to come, which could reimpose prior United Nations Security Council resolutions on Iran.
The diplomatic landscape remains fluid, and while no party appears willing to escalate to open conflict, the risk of further deterioration in U.S.-Iran relations remains significan t. Whether through Russian mediation, European diplomatic efforts, or direct U.S.-Iran engagement, the path forward is uncertain. However, prospects for negotiations have not closed. Iran’s response to Trump’s letter, when it arrives, could prove significant in opening or closing the window for possible negotiations in the weeks and months to come.
Economic Crisis Sparks Political Shake-Up: Hemmati Dismissed on March 2 Amid Inflation and Currency Woes [[link removed]]
On March 2, members of the Iranian Parliament voted to dismiss Abdulnaser Hemmati, the Minister of Economy and Finance, after reviewing his impeachment proposal . During an afternoon session chaired by Masoud Pezeshkian, the cabinet expressed regret over not having granted Hemmati a vote of confidence. Shortly thereafter, President Rahmatollah Akrami was appointed to lead the Ministry of Economy and Finance—a role he assumed after serving as Deputy Minister of Economy, overseeing national financial supervision and treasury management.
Out of the 273 members present, 182 voted against Hemmati while only 89 supported his continuation in office . Officials cited factors such as currency fluctuations, devaluation of the national currency, an inflation crisis, and rising prices of essential goods as the primary reasons for the impeachment.
Pezeshkian, who attended the session to defend his minister, declared that the country is “at war” and noted that even Qatar, Turkey, and Iraq are withholding the return of Iran’s dollars . He explained that following the arrival of Donald Trump and the enactment of specific legislation, many of Iran’s ships were sanctioned at sea—hindering their ability to offload oil and gas. He further pointed out that although Iran holds significant dollar reserves, they are not being returned, citing the Supreme Leader’s claim that Qatar holds six billion dollars on Iran’s behalf. Similar conditions exist in Iraq and Turkey.
Pezeshian emphasized that since his government took office, the country has faced a series of challenges —from the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh amid his inauguration to crises in Gaza and Lebanon, as well as issues stemming from Trump’s policies. He added that, in times of war, assigning blame will not resolve the underlying problems. He recalled that the Supreme Leader has repeatedly described the sanctions and economic pressures as an “economic war.”
During his address, Pezeshkian revealed that he initially supported negotiations with the United States but that he abandoned that position when the Supreme Leader announced his opposition . He also apologized on behalf of the government for power outages and energy issues, stating, “I apologize once again from this podium to our dear citizens. I never intended for us to burn diesel or cut off electricity to our people and factories.” He warned that without these measures, gas supplies might have been halted during the winter months. Pezeshkian further observed that managerial problems cannot be resolved in six months, noting that his ministers have yet to appoint the appropriate managers.
On Pezeshkian’s pivot on U.S. negotiations, foreign policy and political commentator Diako Hosseini outlined concerns that such a position could be harmful to Iran over the long term. He stated “Preparing to negotiate with the United States, with all the obstacles and uncertainties surrounding it, is not wise compared to last year, but it is wise compared to next year; unless Iran expects economic growth, international influence, and higher national currency value, as well as lower inflation, budget deficits, and instability, for next year.”
Opposing the impeachment, Mohammad Ghasem Osmani from Boukan argued, “Only this government is facing such exceptional conditions, and today we must support it rather than hinder it .” In contrast, Jabbar Kochakinajad, a member of the Budget and Planning Commission and a supporter of the impeachment, contended, “This impeachment, driven by the minister’s poor performance, will ultimately benefit the government.” Meanwhile, Ruhollah Izadkhah of Tehran remarked, “We have no personal issues with Hemmati, but we stand against an economy that is overly dependent. Is it too late to prevent an economic collapse?”
Some parliamentarians also referenced text messages sent by Saeed Jalili’s faction – dubbed the shadow government faction to underscore their commitment to undermining the administration – urging members to vote in favor of impeachment . Osmani claimed that Hemmati had “removed a thousand instances of rent-seeking from the profiteers’ clutches” and noted that messages circulated among members stating, “You are not a man if you do not vote for impeachment.” Gholamreza Tajgardoon, head of the Budget and Planning Commission, confirmed that similar messages were indeed sent. Supporters of
Defending himself, Hemmati stated, “The increase in the exchange rate and the conversion rate of the Rial to the dollar (approximately 91 to 92 thousand Toman) does not reflect the real market price but is driven by inflationary expectations .” He added, “Underlying inflation is one of the country’s most significant issues; however, the inflation rate in Iran has decreased. In this month last year, inflation was 42% , and it has now dropped to 32% . Yes, 32% is still high, but it is an improvement compared to 42 or 55%.”
Hemmati further explained that factors such as events in Syria and Lebanon, the loss of major resistance leaders, the rise of Trump, and essentially the declaration of an outright economic war were additional contributors to the exchange rate fluctuations . Addressing the parliament, he stated, “I will not discuss matters that might please the enemy,” referring to what he described as the “terrible misalignment” in the banking sector. He noted, “Over the past seven years, 10 million people have fallen below the poverty line; we are well aware of this, and based on our capabilities, we are moving forward.” Furthermore, the Minister of Economy stressed that despite what has been characterized as an “economic war” waged by foreign countries against Iran, the country is effectively being run by the resilience of its people, and he attributed the current growth in liquidity to longstanding issues rooted in the past.
IRNA, the official news agency of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in reaction to the pressure exerted on the government, described Mr. Hemmati’s impeachment as a “harm to unity” in one of its headlines. Itt stated that “It is the duty of the parliament to supervise the performance of the government, but turning it into a partisan and subjective dispute is not only not beneficial for our country, but also fundamentally damaging.”
Iran’s Short Animation “In the Shadow of the Cypress” Shines at the Oscars, Triumphing Against All Odds [[link removed]]
Representing Iran at this year’s Oscars, the film “In the Shadow of the Cypress” clinched the Best Short Animation award by telling the moving story of a war survivor in a distinctive way. The film explores the intricate life of a small family—a father battling post-accident challenges and his injured daughter who remains at his side. Through their wordless interactions, the film powerfully conveys the deep suffering both endure.
For Hossein Molayemi and Shirin Soohani, participating in the Oscars was not without its hurdles . They encountered significant difficulties in obtaining a U.S. visa—spending several days in Oman awaiting an interview appointment at the U.S. Embassy. Ultimately, their visas were issued just one day before the ceremony, allowing them to arrive in Los Angeles a few hours before the event began. In their acceptance speech, Soohani and Molayemi noted their earlier disappointment at seemingly not being able to attend, only to arrive with just hours to spare to receive the award.
Molayemi and Soohani said that just producing the film “under the extraordinary circumstances of our country is a miracle.” They dedicated their award to all of those fighting both inner and outer battles, and fellow Iranians who are still suffering.
The animation was meticulously produced using hand-drawn 2D and frame-by-frame techniques, methods that are recognized as some of the most challenging in the animation industry. The directors disclosed that while creating this 20-minute film, they faced serious financial constraints and a shortage of manpower. Nonetheless, their determination ensured the film’s timing, continuity, and narrative rhythm were maintained, and its impressive sound design and musical score have won widespread acclaim from critics.
Overcoming stiff competition from films like the French short animation “Yuck” and the Japanese anime “Magic Candies”, “In the Shadow of the Cypress” has rekindled hopes for a renaissance in Iranian short animation, reminding audiences of the nation’s storied past in the field . Experts now believe this success could signal a turning point for the industry in Iran.
Both artists have been vocal in their criticism of the prolonged visa process and the impact of U.S. sanctions on Iran . In an interview, Hossein Molayemi stated:
“The most important problem is that we have been living under sanctions for years. Our national currency is devaluing and shrinking every day. Ultimately, the key issue is the economic crisis and the mental strain that we Iranians suffer because of it.”
Zarif Steps Aside Amid Judicial Pressure and Political Turbulence [[link removed]]
Mohammad-Javad Zarif, the former Iran’s Foreign Minister and current strategic deputy under Masoud Pezeshkian, has submitted his resignation to the President after a meeting with the head of the judiciary, Gholam Hossein Mohseni Ejei. In the meeting, Ejei advised Zarif to step aside. However, according to government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani, his resignation has not yet been accepted by President Pezeshkian.
Initial reports of his resignation emerged from domestic media, including IRNA, and were later confirmed by Zarif on social media . In Sunday evening post, Zarif stated:
“Yesterday, at the invitation of the honorable head of the judiciary, I met with him. Given the country’s current state, he advised that, to ease pressure on the government, I should return to academia. I accepted immediately, as I have always wished to be a helper rather than a burden.”
In his follow-up statement, he intentionally used the phrase “stepping aside” rather than “resigning,” explaining:
“I hope that by stepping aside, excuses for launching attacks against the will of the people and the government’s success will be nullified. I remain proud to support the esteemed Dr. Pezeshkian and wish him and all other true servants of the people the very best.”
In response to Mr. Zarif’s resignation and Mr. Hemmati’s dismissal, Mohammad Reza Aref, the First Deputy of the President, engaged in indirect criticism of the administration’s opponents, stating, “The approach of the 14th government is one of commitment to unity, even though we have noticed some instances of unkind behavior.”
Although this is not the first time Zarif has resigned, his public explanation this time is notably different . His resignation, announced on Sunday evening, coincided with a dramatic shift in parliament. On the same day, the Islamic Consultative Assembly impeached Abdulnaser Hemmati, the Minister of Economy and Finance, in a no-confidence vote—182 votes in favor against 89 votes opposed out of 273 members.
Zarif served as Iran’s Foreign Minister for eight years under President Hassan Rouhani, playing a central role in the nuclear negotiations that led to the JCPOA, a deal that attracted sharp criticism from conservative factions . Despite ongoing verbal attacks and criticism, following his electoral victory last year, Dr. Pezeshkian appointed him as his strategic deputy. In recent months, Zarif has faced mounting pressure from various quarters, including backlash from hardline right-wing groups over his comments on hijab.
Regarded as a symbol by advocates for improved relations with the West, Zarif’s decision to step aside underscores the growing influence of opponents of negotiations with the United States within the Islamic Republic . During the Hemmati impeachment session, Dr. Pezeshkian subtly noted that while Ayatollah Khamenei opposes U.S. negotiations, he had previously personally supported dialogue—though ultimately, he has accepted the Supreme Leader’s stance. If the resignation holds, the Pezeshkian government will move forward without the direct involvement of one of Iran’s most accomplished diplomats – and one who has served as a lightning rod for hardline attacks.
Turkey and Iran Exchange Diplomatic Blows Amid Rising Regional Tensions [[link removed]]
Amid escalating diplomatic tensions, Iran and Turkey’s foreign ministries summoned their respective diplomats after Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan accused Tehran of destabilizing actions in the region . In an interview with Al Jazeera’s Qatar channel, Fidan criticized Iran’s reliance on paramilitary groups to maintain influence in Iraq and Syria, arguing that the costs outweigh the gains. He warned that inciting unrest in a third country could prompt retaliation, as other states might support opposition groups domestically. Fidan also stressed that no country—Arab, Turkish, Kurdish, or Iranian—should seek to dominate the region.
Fidan, who led Turkey’s intelligence agency for nearly eight years, claimed he had previously raised these concerns with Qassem Soleimani, the late commander of the Quds Force, warning that Iran’s interference could provoke countermeasures.
In response, Esmaeil Baghaei, spokesperson for Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, accused the U.S. and Israel of covert manipulation in the region. He stated: “It is clear that, as the Turkish Foreign Minister put it, ‘the region must be freed from the culture of one country seeking domination over others; neither Arabs, nor Turks, nor Kurds, nor Iranians—none should seek to dominate, disturb, or threaten the other.’ But what about Israel?”
Baghaei further argued that after Damascus fell to Turkish-backed forces, Israel launched extensive attacks on Syria’s military, destroying over 90 percent of its facilities, reoccupying the Golan Heights, and seizing more Syrian territory.
Baghaei insisted that Iran has not pursued regional ambitions for the past five decades, but has instead focused on supporting the Palestinian cause. He also pointed to Iran’s role in combating ISIS, opposing the coup in Turkey, and advocating for the disarmament of the PKK as proof of its commitment to regional stability.
Following Fidan’s remarks, Iran summoned the Turkish ambassador on March 3, although the Iranian Foreign Ministry’s statement avoided using the word “summon,” instead referring to it as a “meeting.”
According to the Iranian Foreign Ministry, Mahmoud Heydari, the ministry’s director general for the Mediterranean and Eastern Europe region, warned Turkish Ambassador Hicabi Kirlangic that “false statements and unrealistic analyses that could strain bilateral relations should be avoided, given the two nations’ common interests and the sensitive regional situation.”
On March 4, Turkey retaliated by summoning Iran’s chargé d’affaires in Ankara. Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesperson Oncu Keceli criticized Iranian officials for making increasingly public attacks on Turkey, stating: “Foreign policy should never be used for domestic political purposes. We prefer to deliver critical messages directly, which is what we did today.” Keceli emphasized that despite tensions, Turkey values its relationship with Iran.
These developments come as Turkey has expanded its own regional influence. Turkey’s support was pivotal in Azerbaijan’s victory in the Caucasus and in the ouster of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria. Despite these frictions, a rare visit by Turkey’s intelligence chief to Tehran last month, along with a recent phone call between Fidan and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, highlights ongoing high-level diplomacy between the two nations.
Deadly Shooting in Iranshahr: Outrage Grows as Authorities Investigate Police [[link removed]]
A tragic shooting in Iranshahr has led to the death of a five-year-old child, Youssef Shahli-Bar, and the severe injury of his pregnant mother, who later lost her unborn child. The incident, which occurred on the night of February 24, has triggered widespread public outcry, an official investigation, and the arrest of several security personnel.
According to Iranian MP Rahmadel Bamari, the shooting happened during a car chase. He stated that several individuals suspected of involvement have been arrested, based on a report from the provincial judiciary. However, conflicting reports have emerged. Baluchi human rights activists and eyewitnesses claim the attack was carried out by special police forces, while Mohammadreza Eshaqi, the police commander of Sistan and Baluchestan, denies this, attributing the shooting to unknown assailants.
Following public outrage, the provincial prosecutor’s office launched an investigation, leading to the arrest of nine police officers allegedly linked to the shooting. Zahedan’s prosecutor, Mehdi Shams-Abadi, confirmed that those responsible will face legal consequences. The killing has drawn strong condemnation, including from Molavi Abdulhamid, the Sunni cleric of Zahedan, who urged authorities to swiftly prosecute those responsible. He criticized the reckless use of gunfire during police chases, stating: “If a suspect escapes, it is better than innocent people being killed by gunfire.”
Meanwhile, Youssef’s family is demanding transparency and justice. In a widely circulated video, his uncle, Reza Shahli-Bar, emphasized that their only demand is to uncover the truth. Reports suggest that the family has been pressured by security forces to deny claims that the Tactical Police Unit was responsible. In videos from the hospital, Youssef’s father can be heard expressing frustration over the absence of a surgeon, raising separate concerns about medical shortages in Sistan and Baluchestan. The region has long suffered from inadequate healthcare facilities, which has only further fueled public frustration.
The funeral of Youssef Shahli-Bar was attended by grieving relatives and locals, with human rights organizations calling for accountability. While the official narrative remains disputed, authorities claim that a special police investigation team has been dispatched to Iranshahr. Despite these assurances, activists continue to question whether full justice will be served.
The incident has reignited concerns about law enforcement practices in Sistan and Baluchestan, where citizens have repeatedly been killed during high-speed police chases. Calls for police reform and accountability continue to grow as the country watches how authorities handle this deeply troubling case.
Escalating Hardliner Pressure: The Hijab and Chastity Law as a Political Tool [[link removed]]
The recent impeachment of Abdolnasser Hemmati and the forced resignation of Mohammad Javad Zarif mark a significant escalation in the hardliners’ campaign against President Masoud Pezeshkian’s administration . Now, a new development—a letter signed by 209 members of Parliament demanding the enforcement of the controversial Hijab and Chastity Law—further underscores this growing pressure. While officially framed as a response to cultural concerns, the letter is widely perceived as another calculated effort to tighten control over Pezeshkian’s government.
President Pezeshkian emphasized today that he cannot enforce the Hijab and Chastity law because it creates problems for the people, and he will not stand against the people.
The passage of the Hijab and Chastity Law has intensified debates across Iran. The law, consisting of 74 articles, mandates strict enforcement of hijab compliance in both public and private spheres. It has faced widespread criticism from legal experts, political figures, activists, and the general public for infringing on individual freedoms, prioritizing ideology over pressing economic concerns, and risking further societal division.
The controversy surrounding the hijab law is deeply intertwined with the broader struggle for women’s rights in Iran . The Woman, Life, Freedom movement, which emerged in September 2022, was ignited by the tragic killing of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman who died in police custody after being arrested by the morality police for allegedly violating Iran’s strict dress code. Her death sparked nationwide protests, shaking the foundations of the Iranian political system and intensifying calls for greater personal freedoms and government accountability. The movement saw widespread participation from women, students, and activists, leading to an unprecedented challenge to the state’s control over social and cultural policies. In the wake of these protests, the Iranian government has sought to reassert its authority through increased surveillance, harsher penalties, and renewed legislative measures like the Hijab and Chastity Law.
During a parliamentary session on March 4, MP Amir Hossein Bankipour addressed the chamber, framing the impeachment and resignation of key officials as victories against “illegal appointments and flawed economic policies.” He further emphasized that Parliament was responding to “the cultural demands of the people” by urging immediate enforcement of the Hijab and Chastity Law.
The letter, addressed to Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, presents the hijab issue as a matter of national security, alleging that foreign influences—including “Zionist regimes and Western media networks”—are fueling “moral corruption” in Iran . The signatories argue that failing to enforce the law would embolden those seeking to dismantle Iran’s cultural fabric.
Observers interpret this move as part of a broader hardline strategy to weaken Pezeshkian’s government . The removal of Hemmati and Zarif—both seen as moderate or pragmatic figures—has now given way to an intensified focus on cultural and social policies as a means of exerting control. The renewed push for the Hijab and Chastity Law serves as a convenient instrument in this power struggle.
A parliamentary source speaking to Khabar Online noted that “attacks on Pezeshkian’s government are being orchestrated on multiple fronts—one day it’s economic leadership, another day it’s cultural policies, and tomorrow it will be another minister’s turn.” This ongoing campaign suggests a deliberate effort to keep the government on the defensive and obstruct any reform efforts that might challenge hardliner dominance. Complicating the issue, the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) had previously put enforcement of the Hijab and Chastity Law on hold, triggering backlash from hardliners. In response, conservative factions have launched media campaigns and parliamentary maneuvers to contest the SNSC’s authority on the matter.
Saeed Jalili, an influential hardliner and SNSC member, publicly challenged the council’s decision, claiming that “no such resolution exists” to halt the law’s enforcement . His allies in Parliament and conservative activist circles have echoed this stance, portraying the delay as an affront to the legislative process.
However, Speaker Ghalibaf appeared to validate the SNSC’s authority when, on February 3, he stated publicly that “if the Supreme National Security Council determines that a law’s enforcement could lead to tension, it has the authority to suspend it.” This directly contradicts the claims of hardliners advocating for immediate implementation. MP Mehrdad Goodarzvand Chigini of Rudbar reinforced this position, citing Article 176 of the Constitution to emphasize that SNSC decisions take precedence over parliamentary rulings in matters of national security. He urged his colleagues to uphold the integrity of Parliament by avoiding unconstitutional demands.
According to ILNA, Goodarzvand Chigini criticized MPs for acting on misinformation, stating, “Some representatives wrongly concluded that the SNSC had no ruling on the hijab issue based on unverified reports.” He further called on Speaker Ghalibaf to address concerns from all factions and prevent Parliament from becoming a battleground for political infighting.
The intensifying hardliner push for the hijab law suggests a broader strategy to weaken Pezeshkian’s administration by creating a multi-front challenge . The current battle over this law may foreshadow more aggressive efforts to paralyze the government’s policymaking, particularly as future elections approach.
Meanwhile, Pezeshkian himself has expressed skepticism about the feasibility of enforcing the law. In a televised interview last December, he stated, “As an executive body, we face many unanswered questions about the feasibility of implementing this law. We must ensure that any policy we enforce strengthens societal unity rather than deepening divisions.” He criticized aspects of the law, including fines imposed on ride-share drivers for their passengers’ attire, warning that such measures would exacerbate public grievances.
His cautious stance contrasts sharply with that of judiciary chief Gholamhosseini Mohseni Ejei, who recently insisted that “the law must be implemented without hesitation.” During a parliamentary session, Ejei remarked that “any enacted law must be upheld, even if modifications or clarifications are later deemed necessary.”
The hardliner campaign against Pezeshkian’s government appears to be escalating, using both legislative and public opinion tactics to pressure the administration . By reviving the hijab debate at a time when economic concerns dominate public discourse, conservatives seem intent on diverting attention while simultaneously consolidating their influence.
The law has also sparked significant public dissent. The hashtag “ابلاغ نکن” (“Do not enforce”) has gained traction on Iranian social media, with many urging Pezeshkian to refuse to implement the law. Critics argue that enforcing the law could alienate the youth, deepen societal fractures, and overshadow pressing economic concerns. Legal experts and activists have warned of its far-reaching implications, with some describing it as a “grotesque display of authoritarianism.”
Whether Pezeshkian can navigate this challenge without making significant concessions remains to be seen . However, one thing is certain: the struggle over Iran’s political and cultural future is far from over.
Shooting at Labor Protest in Takab Leaves Four Municipal Workers Injured [[link removed]]
A shooting incident during a labor protest by municipal service workers in Takab, West Azerbaijan has left four protesting workers injured, with various sources offering conflicting accounts of the circumstances of the incident. The protesting workers had gathered in front of the City Council building to demand their overdue wages.
The governor of Takab, Rouhollah Mohammadian, announced in a statement to the IRNA news agency that the injured workers had been discharged from Imam Ali Hospital after receiving medical treatment . The protest was part of an ongoing demonstration by municipal workers that had been going on for several weeks. On Monday, March 3, a group of municipal service workers gathered in the municipal compound to protest several months of unpaid wages. Workers had previously voiced their concerns in a video from a protest five weeks earlier, urging City Council members to focus on securing their overdue wages instead of impeaching the mayor. Eventually, the Takab City Council removed the mayor from office and appointed Mohammad Baqer Rostami as interim mayor on March 3.
According to the human rights news agency Hrana, labor activists reported that law enforcement officers intervened in the protest, leading to violent clashes and gunfire . As a result, four workers sustained injuries. However, Takab’s governor offered a different account, claiming that a security officer fired warning shots in the air in a “safe area” to maintain security and protect himself. He stated that “the bullet ricocheted off the ground, causing injuries to the workers’ legs.”
Mohammadian also confirmed that legal proceedings are underway, stating, “A case has been opened regarding the incident, and investigations are being conducted by the relevant authorities . Those responsible will be dealt with according to the law, regardless of their position.”
ILNA news agency, also reported on the incident, citing a labor source in Takab, indicating that shooting was “unintentional” and occurred after a City Council member called law enforcement to disperse the protest . The labor source told ILNA, “As security forces arrived at the scene, one of the officers cocked his weapon. In response, a worker, fearing the officer’s actions, intervened. A shot was fired, hit the ground, and shrapnel from the bullet struck several workers.”
Labor activists identified the injured workers as Amir Raha, Maqsood Ghorbanpour, Iraj Moradi, and Hamid Navidi . Last year, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), based in Brussels, ranked Iran’s labor conditions as “red” in its annual report. This classification indicates that there are no guaranteed rights for labor unions or workers’ collective actions in the country.
Support NIAC's important work by making a contribution today.
Donate → [[link removed]]
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; text-align: center; padding: 60px 30px 45px;">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="35%"> </td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td style="text-align: center; padding: 0 8px;"><a href="[link removed]" style="mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1%; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="[link removed]" style="line-height: 1%; margin: 0px; vertical-align: middle; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 36px; height: 36px;" /> </a></td>
<td width="35%"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; border-top: 1px solid #000; color: #000; padding: 30px 30px 10px; text-align: center;"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; color: #000; padding: 0 30px;">
<p><span style="display: block; font-family: Arial, sans-serif !important; font-size: 18px; font-weight: 700; mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1.2;">Receive this email from a friend? <a href="[link removed]" style="color: #002b49;">See previous issues and/or sign up here</a>.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; color: #000; padding: 0 30px 20px;"><span style="display: block; font-family: Arial, sans-serif !important; font-size: 14px; mso-line-height-rule: exactly; line-height: 1.7;">This email was sent to [email protected] because you signed up to receive the latest Iran Unfiltered newsletter in your inbox. If you don't want to receive this newsletter in the future, we'd hate to see you go but you can <a href="[link removed]" style="color: #002b49;">manage your subscription and unsubscribe here</a>. Iran Unfiltered is a weekly digest tracking Iranian politics & society from the National Iranian American Council, a 501(c)3 grassroots organization. </span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: #fff; padding: 0 30px 30px;"><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="display:block"><span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif !important"><span style="line-height:1.2">© 2020 National Iranian American Council | PO Box 65439 | Washington, DC 20035</span></span></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
Message Analysis
- Sender: National Iranian American Council
- Political Party: n/a
- Country: United States
- State/Locality: n/a
- Office: n/a
-
Email Providers:
- EveryAction