From Brennan Center for Justice <[email protected]>
Subject Voting rights 60 years after Bloody Sunday
Date March 6, 2025 10:01 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Sixty years after Bloody Sunday in Selma, Alabama, the struggle for equal access to the ballot continues. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Donate

[link removed]

[link removed]



[link removed]

Justin Sullivan/Getty

Barriers to the Ballot Persist

[link removed]

On Wednesday, Alabama Rep. Terri Sewell reintroduced the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. It comes just days before the 60th anniversary of Bloody Sunday, when Lewis and other voting rights protesters were beaten by police in Selma. The brutal spectacle galvanized support for the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but recent Supreme Court decisions have hollowed out that landmark law. The bill now before the House seeks to restore it.

A new Brennan Center analysis shows how badly this legislation is needed. After more than a decade of weakened protections against racially discriminatory voting policies, the gap between Black and white voter turnout in Alabama’s 2024 elections reached a 16-year high

[link removed]

.

Taking Action for Democracy

[link removed]

From illegally dismantling federal agencies and resisting court orders to politicizing the Justice Department and pardoning the January 6 insurrectionists, the new Trump administration’s actions have flown in the face of the rule of law. Meanwhile, the GOP majority in Congress is pushing the SAVE Act

[link removed]

, which would require Americans to produce a passport or birth certificate to register (or re-register) to vote. If enacted, the legislation could disenfranchise millions of Americans, especially people of color and married women who have changed their names. But there is also a growing public appetite to fight back — here are three things that individuals can do now to stand up for democracy

[link removed]

.

How Women Won the Vote

[link removed]

The path to the 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote, spanned more than a century and was driven by the tireless efforts of generations of activists. But securing the franchise was only part of the battle. It took decades more to ensure that all women — particularly women of color, who faced racially discriminatory barriers — could truly exercise that right. In honor of Women’s History Month, our new explainer dives into the long, winding road to women’s suffrage and highlights the key figures who made it possible

[link removed]

.

Defending North Carolina Voters

[link removed]

The losing candidate in last fall’s election to fill a seat on the North Carolina Supreme Court is challenging more than 60,000 votes over a technicality. Last week, the Brennan Center and co-counsel filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of overseas voters whose ballots are at risk of being thrown out. The stakes are high: If the courts side with this effort, it could not only disenfranchise American voters but also fuel baseless attacks on the democratic process in other states

[link removed]

.

Thumb on the Scales of Justice

[link removed]

Three state attorneys general have revived a federal lawsuit seeking to ban medication abortion, and once again, the case will be heard by a judge in Amarillo, Texas, who openly opposes abortion. This isn’t by chance — it’s part of a disturbing trend known as “judge shopping,” in which plaintiffs strategically choose a judge likely to rule in their favor. Our new explainer dives into how this practice works, its impact on the fairness and credibility of the courts, and what can be done to end it

[link removed]

.

A Band-Aid on DHS Intelligence Abuses

[link removed]

The Department of Homeland Security’s lead intelligence unit has spent the past two years trying to reform its controversial practices, including its targeted surveillance of Americans. While recent changes represent a small step forward, they don’t tackle the deeper risks of abuse — particularly when it comes to politically sensitive issues like social media monitoring and immigration enforcement. A former DHS intelligence attorney warns that unless Congress intervenes, the department’s troubling legacy of overreach is likely to continue

[link removed]

.





PODCAST: A Presidential Lawbreaking Spree

Our latest podcast episode breaks down President Trump’s lawbreaking spree since returning to office, how courts have responded, and what should happen next according to the rule of law. The panelists include Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Brennan Center Liberty and National Security Program; Sean Morales-Doyle, director of the Brennan Center Voting Rights Program; Daniel Weiner, director of the Brennan Center Elections and Government Program; Barton Gellman, a senior adviser at the Brennan Center; and Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center. Listen on Spotify

[link removed]

, Apple Podcasts

[link removed]

, or your favorite podcast platform

[link removed]

, or watch it on YouTube

[link removed]

.





BRENNAN CENTER ON SOCIAL MEDIA

[link removed]

The Trump administration is taking aim at our free, fair, and secure elections. Watch on TikTok &gt;&gt;

[link removed]







[link removed]

Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law

120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271

646-292-8310

tel:646-292-8310

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Support Brennan Center

[link removed]

View Online

[link removed]

Want to change how you receive these emails or unsubscribe? Click here

[link removed]

to update your preferences.

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis