Conflicts around the world—from Ukraine, to the Middle East, to Ethiopia—are increasingly defined by one particular kind of warfare: strategic bombing. With the rise of precise, long-range drones and missiles, state and nonstate actors alike can bombard targets from great distances at relatively little cost. The technology behind strategic bombing may be new, says RAND's Raphael Cohen, but its allure builds on the long-standing presumption that airpower is a “precise form of warfare that can end conflicts quickly.” In reality, the results fall short. And as strategic bombing becomes more common, “civilian populations and crucial infrastructure will ultimately pay the price.”

A new RAND report examines the field of architecture in the United States. Our researchers surveyed thousands of students, faculty, and practicing architects to learn more about how people become interested in architecture, the current state of training and education, the skills required for practicing professionals, and more. The findings point to a handful of recommendations that may be useful to leaders in the field. For example, revisiting the admissions process and considering ways to cut student costs could encourage more people to pursue careers in architecture.