Senate Hearing is a Step Toward Ending Section 230 Once and For All
Fifteen-year-old John Doe (pseudonym) was seeking people who would accept him. People who wouldn't bully him for being on the spectrum. Or for being gay.
He thought he could find that on the Grindr dating app.
But instead, Grindr "matched" John with four adult men who repeatedly raped him.
Undoubtedly, those four adult men shoulder the blame for John's rape. But so does Grindr.
Grindr claimed to be an 18+ dating app, yet aggressively marketed to children. It did not verify John's age when he signed up for an account. Instead, it welcomed the child onto the app, geolocated him, and matched him with nearby adult predators.
But when John and his family filed a lawsuit against Grindr for facilitating this child sexual abuse, the court dismissed the case. Why, you may ask? Because current law prevents tech companies from facing repercussions when their platform harms its users, even when the company clearly took an active role in causing that harm.
Carrie Goldberg, attorney for John Doe and his family, shared this story last week at a Senate Judiciary Commitee Hearing on Communications Decency Act Section 230.
Section 230 is the reason John and his family were robbed of justice. It must be repealed.