To view this email as a web page, click here

.
AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

Removal of internal constraints

Supercharged Presidential Power

March 1, 2025

So far, the Trump administration has pursued its far-reaching agenda in part by radically changing how the president relates to executive branch lawyers. AEI scholar and Department of Justice veteran Jack Landman Goldsmith documents how the administration has replaced personnel and sidelined organizations like the Office of Legal Counsel to remove internal executive branch legal constraints on presidential action.

 

 

Writing in Foreign Affairs, Hal Brands evaluates the pros and cons of the administration’s worldview, highlighting both the important potential to strengthen the free world’s hard power and the serious risks of alienating America’s close allies.

 

On domestic policy, the administration has rightly turned its attention to America’s broken higher education system. In a new AEI report, Beth Akers outlines a conservative vision for reforming federal student loan and subsidy programs to maximize accountability and return on investment for students and taxpayers.

 

More than any other issue, economic discontent played a key role in Donald Trump’s return to the White House, and the administration’s success or failure hinges on its ability to deliver growth and prosperity. In new research, Paul H. Kupiec highlights an underreported aspect of Americans’ economic concerns: Household wealth is lower than it was in 2021.

Tides of Fortune: The Rise and Decline of Great Militaries

How will the United States and China evolve militarily in the years ahead? In his new book, Tides of Fortune: The Rise and Decline of Great Militaries, Zack Cooper answers this question through an ambitious look at how the 20th century’s great powers devised their own military strategies. Drawing on a decade of research and his experience at the White House and Pentagon, Cooper tracks how national leaders adjusted their defense objectives, strategies, and investments in response to perceived shifts in relative power. All these militaries followed a common pattern, and their experiences shed new light on both China’s recent military modernization and America’s potential responses.

More from AEI
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Meet Douglas Murray, Europe’s Paul Revere

Tunku Varadarajan
The Wall Street Journal

What Do You Call an Automatic Stabilizer That Doesn’t Shrink When Conditions Improve? The Biden Food Stamps Blowout

Matt Weidinger and Angela Rachidi
COSM Commentary

The Public Health Triumph No One’s Talking About

Sally Satel
National Review

Housing Subsidy Programs Need a DOGE Audit

Tobias Peter and Edward J. Pinto
Washington Examiner

Lower Cost, More Lethality: The US Defense Budget Is Getting a Trim

Mackenzie Eaglen
19FortyFive

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

Who Killed Beauty? The Demise of Art Deco and the Rise of Ugly Buildings

Christopher J. Scalia and Megan Gafford
The Back of the Book

Dignity and Dynamism: The Future of Conservative Technology Policy

M. Anthony Mills and Christine Rosen
AEI event

Revitalizing North Tulsa

Ian Rowe et al.
The Invisible Men

What Do the California Fires Teach Us About the Need to Invest in Climate Adaptation? Bjorn Lomborg Explains.

Danielle Pletka et al.
What the Hell Is Going On?

Buckley’s Book Club

Jonah Goldberg and Christopher J. Scalia
The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

Realists also have a legitimacy problem. True, opinion polls often show that the American public is ambivalent or unwilling to bear significant burdens overseas. That doesn’t mean they will support policies that wind up strengthening Russia, China, and Iran.

Matthew Continetti