[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
To Cozy Up to Trump, Bezos Banishes Dissent From WaPo Pete Tucker ([link removed])


Elon Musk: Bravo, @JeffBezos!

Elon Musk (X, 2/26/25 ([link removed]) ) gives his seal of approval to the new univocal Washington Post.

“Bravo, Jeff Bezos!”

That was the congratulatory message Elon Musk posted on X ([link removed]) , the platform he bought ([link removed]) for $44 billion in 2022 and subsequently turned ([link removed]) into a pro-Trump bullhorn. Musk’s “bravo” was in response to Bezos' shocking announcement that he was taking his media outlet, the Washington Post, in a Trumpian direction as well.

The Post’s opinion section will now advance Bezos' “two pillars: personal liberties and free markets.” Anyone not on board with this “significant shift” can take a hike, Bezos seemed to tell Post employees, in a note he also shared on X (2/26/25 ([link removed]) ).

That was Wednesday morning. By evening, Bezos was dining ([link removed]) with President Trump.


** 'Those who think as he does'
------------------------------------------------------------
Present Age: Jeff Bezos Just Announced The Washington Post Will Now Be His Personal Megaphone

Parker Molloy (Present Age, 2/26/25 ([link removed]) ): "The audacity of claiming that free market ideas are 'underserved' in American media is staggering. Has Bezos somehow missed the existence of the Wall Street Journal, the Economist, Bloomberg, Fox Business, CNBC and countless other outlets that have spent decades championing free-market capitalism?"

Bezos doesn't give any detail on what he means by "personal liberties," but in the context of the billionaire appearing ([link removed]) behind Trump at the inauguration, and Amazon contributing ([link removed]) $1 million to the inaugural festivities—on top of paying ([link removed]) Melania Trump $40 million for her biopic—it's doubtful that his paper will be talking much about the myriad liberties under attack ([link removed]) by the Trump administration.

“When billionaires talk about ‘personal liberties,’” media critic Parker Molloy (Present Age, 2/26/25 ([link removed]) ) noted, “they're usually thinking about their personal liberty to avoid taxation and regulation.”

Meanwhile, as Bezos professes his love of personal liberties, “his news organization now will forbid views other than his own in its opinion section,” said former Post executive editor Marty Baron (American Crisis, 2/27/25 ([link removed]) ):

It was only weeks ago that the Post described itself as providing coverage for “all of America.” Now its opinion pages will be open to only some of America, those who think exactly as he does.

Such limitations may not be limited to the opinion pages. Post media critic Erik Wemple penned a column about Bezos' directive—and, according to former Post editor Gene Weingarten (Gene Pool, 2/27/25 ([link removed]) ), “It was spiked. Killed, in newspeak.”


** 'A wingman in the fight'
------------------------------------------------------------
Politico: Dying in Darkness: Jeff Bezos Turns Out the Lights in the Washington Post’s Opinion Section

Michael Schaffer (Politico, 2/26/25 ([link removed]) ): Bezos' "latest edict effectively rebrands the publication away from the interests of Washington and toward the politics of Silicon Valley—and looks likely to cost it a chunk of the remaining audience."

Bezos’ fidelity to his other pillar, “free markets,” is no less questionable, considering his companies hoover up billions of dollars in government contracts ([link removed]) , are massively subsidized ([link removed]) , and Amazon, which Bezos founded, is an egregious antitrust violator ([link removed]) .

And somehow Bezos, the world’s third richest person, believes his so-called free market “viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion.” But as Politico columnist Michael Schaffer (2/26/25 ([link removed]) ) noted:

Between the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg and the Economist, there’s no shortage of outlets that are organized around a generally pro-market editorial line. For that matter, there’s the Washington Post. Do you recall the publication editorializing against the free market? Me neither.

Yet Bezos is now committed to turning his paper into a second Wall Street Journal—a project already under way, as Bezos’ handpicked Post publisher and CEO, Will Lewis, comes from ([link removed]) the Journal, as does executive editor Matt Murray.

Naturally, the Journal’s editorial page (2/26/25 ([link removed]) ) welcomed Bezos’ “free markets” pivot, writing, “It will be good to have a wingman in the fight.”

Despite Bezos’ claim that his views are underserved, it’s actually the lefty end of the spectrum for which that’s the case (FAIR.org, 10/9/20 ([link removed]) ). But those wanting anything left of authoritarian capitalism will have to look elsewhere. “Viewpoints opposing [my] pillars will be left to be published by others,” Bezos wrote, adding, “the internet does that job.”

It’s unclear if Bezos was wearing a red “Make America Great Again” hat as he wrote these words, but it’s unmistakable that he’s aligning his paper with Trump’s so-called “America First” agenda. “I am of America and for America, and proud to be so,” Bezos wrote.


** The answer wasn't 'hell yes'
------------------------------------------------------------
Axios: WashPost opinion editor resigns after Jeff Bezos announces changes to Opinion section

Sara Fischer (Axios, 2/26/25 ([link removed]) ): " Efforts by the Trump administration to scrutinize media have forced media, entertainment and tech companies to make difficult decisions about how far they will go to defend their editorial values."

As shocking as Bezos' groveling is, it’s just the latest in a string of extraordinary favors he’s done for Trump and the man Trump has turned much of the US government over to, Elon Musk.

Bezos and Amazon have thrown millions of dollars at the billionaire duo running our country. At the same time, the Post has been kind to both men, most noticeably when Bezos killed the paper’s endorsement of Kamala Harris ahead of the election (FAIR.org, 10/30/24 ([link removed]) ). For Musk, the Post not only spiked an ad critical of him, but also dismissed his Nazi salute on Inauguration Day as merely an “awkward gesture” (FAIR.org, 2/19/25 ([link removed]) , 1/23/25 ([link removed]) ).

With Bezos' new directive, the Post is all but formalizing its lapdog arrangement with Trump and Musk. How this will impact the Post, which Bezos purchased ([link removed]) from the Graham family for $250 million in 2013, remains to be seen. But the fallout ([link removed]) has been swift, and it comes on the heels of a mass exodus ([link removed]) of both readers and top talent since the election.

Now joining ([link removed]) the exodus is Post opinions editor David Shipley. Bezos wanted Shipley to lead the Post’s rightward turn, but only if he was all in. “If the answer wasn’t ‘hell yes,’ then it had to be ‘no,’” Bezos told him ([link removed]) . But Bezos’ directive was too much even for Shipley, who had previously proven his loyalty by spiking a cartoon depicting Bezos and other tech executives groveling before Trump (FAIR.org, 1/7/25 ([link removed]) ).


** 'More like a death knell'
------------------------------------------------------------
Guardian: Jeff Bezos is muzzling the Washington Post’s opinion section. That’s a death knell

Margaret Sullivan (Guardian, 2/26/25 ([link removed]) ): "I foresee a mass subscriber defection from an outlet already deep in red ink; that must be something businessman Bezos is willing to live with."

For those who remain at the Post, they do so warily.

Bezos’ “massive encroachment” into the opinion section “makes clear dissenting views will not be published,” wrote ([link removed]) the Post’s Jeff Stein, who only days earlier had been promoted ([link removed]) to chief economics correspondent:

I still have not felt encroachment on my journalism on the news side, but if Bezos tries interfering with the news side, I will be quitting immediately and letting you know.

Former Posties were also quick to weigh in. “Bezos' move is more than a gut punch; it’s more like a death knell for the once-great news organization,” wrote former Post media columnist Margaret Sullivan (Guardian, 2/26/25 ([link removed]) ):

Bezos no longer wants to own a credible news organization. He wants a megaphone and a political tool that will benefit his own commercial interests.

Those commercial interests extend from earth into space.

“Amazon has a big cloud computing business. [Bezos' space company] Blue Origin is wholly dependent on the US government,” Marty Baron told Zeteo (2/26/25 ([link removed]) ). “Trump can just decide that they’re not going to get any contracts. Is [Bezos] going to put that at risk? Obviously, he’s not going to put that at risk.”

“It’s craven,” said Baron, who led the Post for eight years, nearly all of them under Bezos:

He’s basically fearful of Trump. He has decided that, as timid and tepid as the editorials have been, they’ve been too tough on Trump. He’s saying they’re going to have an opinion page with one point of view.


** 'Contrary to the conspiracy theory'
------------------------------------------------------------
FAIR: WaPo Defends Boss Against Sanders’ Charge That He’s Extremely Wealthy

Back when the Washington Post had "full independence" from Bezos, it was running twisted columns denying that the billionaire had a lot of money (FAIR.org, 10/3/17 ([link removed]) ).

There’s an irony in Baron calling out his former boss, when he spent years attacking others for doing so.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, a hair’s breadth away ([link removed]) from securing the Democratic presidential nomination in 2019, questioned whether his critiques of billionaires (like Bezos) and low-wage behemoths (like Amazon) might be contributing to the Post’s blistering coverage of him (FAIR.org, 8/15/19 ([link removed]) ).

“Contrary to the conspiracy theory the senator seems to favor,” Baron said in response ([link removed]) , “Jeff Bezos allows our newsroom to operate with full independence, as our reporters and editors can attest.”

Fast-forward six years, and the mask is off, so much so that Baron now sounds like Sanders (to whom Baron owes a belated apology).

That the Post’s hard-right turn comes at a time when other corporate and billionaire-owned outlets are also cozying up ([link removed]) to Trump, only makes this moment all the more fraught.

This alarming state of affairs highlights the importance of independent media watchdogs. “We launched FAIR nearly 40 years ago with warnings about the influence of media owners on news content,” FAIR founder Jeff Cohen said in an email:

The first issue of our publication featured a cover story ([link removed]) on the corporate takeover of news written by legendary journalist and Media Monopoly author Ben Bagdikian ([link removed]) . The recent antics of Bezos show that the need to scrutinize and expose corporate media owners is even greater today.

Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .