Last week, I spoke with longtime media writer Paul Farhi for the latest edition of “The Poynter Report Podcast.” That episode debuts today.
We were talking about this major showdown between Donald Trump and The Associated Press. The AP is calling the body of water between Florida and Texas the “Gulf of Mexico.” Trump wants it called the “Gulf of America.” And, Trump says, until the AP agrees with him and changes the name, the AP won’t be welcomed on Air Force One and other certain media events at the White House
We recorded the podcast last Wednesday when Farhi told me, “The AP eventually will exhaust its appeals and it will sue.”
That’s exactly what has happened.
Last Friday, the AP filed suit in the U.S. District Court in Washington alleging the ban violates the First Amendment and the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.
“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,” the AP said in its lawsuit, which named White House chief of staff Susan Wiles, deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich and press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
Leavitt said, “We’ll see them in court.”
In “The Poynter Report Podcast,” Farhi told me this is about more than what the AP is calling a body of water.
He said, “It's about hassling the press and showing who's boss and pushing around the ‘lame stream media,’ as he likes to call it. As I've been explaining to people — it's the first real constitutional, First Amendment case in which it comes down to a single word out of a style book. It's really not about that. It's just asserting who's the big dog, and ‘you all take orders from me,’ and you know that's the Trump model. It's also the authoritarian model. If you can push around the AP on a single word and the usage … what pretext would you have to push around The New York Times, The Washington Post, NBC, etc? He could do the very same thing. And he invites the confrontation. He invites the crisis.”
Farhi and I go into much further detail about the AP case, including why Farhi thinks it is not a good idea for other media outlets to boycott Trump press conferences.
We also have an interesting conversation about the past, present and future of The Washington Post — a place Farhi worked at for 35 years before taking a buyout at the end of 2023. If you have been following the Post drama over the past year, you will be very interested in Farhi’s thoughts.
Farhi continues to write frequently about the media for such places as the Columbia Journalism Review, The Atlantic and Vanity Fair. So be sure to check out our conversation on “The Poynter Report Podcast.”
Follow “The Poynter Report Podcast” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or Amazon Music (and don’t forget to leave us a rating and review).
A slam dunk?
What about this AP lawsuit? Will the AP win?
Seth Stern, director of advocacy for the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said the suit “should be a slam dunk” for the AP. In a statement to The Washington Post’s Jeremy Barr, Stern said, “We welcome the news that the AP is fighting back and not capitulating as others have. There is no gray area here — it’s plainly unconstitutional for presidents to deny news outlets access based on their word choices. But this type of case shouldn’t even need to go to the court of law.
Joy Reid’s show out in MSNBC shakeup