Perhaps no one prepared better for the Trump administration’s assault on foreign aid than the United Nations sexual and reproductive health agency, UNFPA. Every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has stopped funding the agency, while Democratic presidents have restored it, forcing the agency to hunt for other sources of money.
The scope of the Trump administration’s sweeping freeze on foreign aid has caught them off guard. The last time Trump was in the White House, he moved swiftly to end funding for the agency [...] He is expected to do the same now.
But the freeze has done more to disrupt its operations because, [in his first term], Trump permitted UNFPA to spend money that was already appropriated and in the pipeline, granting it some fiscal runway before the money ran out.
No such luck this time around. That has placed several U.S.-funded projects in jeopardy, including a program that employs more than 1,700 female health workers — mostly midwives — in Afghanistan, a country with one of the world’s highest maternal mortality rates. Under the terms of the freeze, they will have to be let go.
“We were prepared for a defunding as best as any agency could,” said Rachel Moynihan, a Washington-based UNFPA official. “We were defunded under the first Trump administration. To their credit, they honored every grant that the U.S. had signed with us.”
So far, the Trump administration has yet to announce a formal decision on defunding UNFPA, as well as other U.N. agencies, but the pause has had a more crippling effect on its operations, stopping funded programs from being implemented.
|