[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Trump Vow to 'Save' TikTok No Reprieve for Free Speech Ari Paul ([link removed])


Sorry, TikTok isn't available right now.

In its message declaring the platform unavailable, TikTok played to Donald Trump's vanity by saying it was "fortunate" to have his assistance.

So here we are. After both houses of Congress approved ([link removed]) it, the president signed it and government attorneys successfully argued ([link removed]) for it in federal court, the ban on TikTok went into effect for a few hours, which for some might have seemed like an eternity.

The law bans the social media platform used by 170 million Americans unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, sells it. While the ban took effect the day before Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration, the site was restored as Trump vowed to extend the app’s life by 90 days (AP, 1/19/25 ([link removed]) ).

I have covered the move to ban TikTok for years (FAIR.org, 8/5/20 ([link removed]) , 5/25/23 ([link removed]) , 11/13/23 ([link removed]) , 3/14/24 ([link removed]) , 9/27/24 ([link removed]) ), so I’ll summarize the problem: Anti-China hysteria (and Israel boosterism ([link removed]) ) led lawmakers in both parties to allege that TikTok harvests user data—which sounds sinister, but is actually par for the course with social media. A ban would hurt millions of people who rely on the app for their personal business and for news consumption, and would set a
terrible anti–free speech precedent, forcing us all to ask what other foreign-owned media products could also face federal censorship.


** Commercial realities
------------------------------------------------------------
Hollywood Reporter: An Obituary for TikTok

For the Hollywood Reporter (1/18/25 ([link removed]) ), what made TikTok unique was that it "allowed any user, regardless of their social clout or level of fame, to reach millions at the click of the button."

While many have rightfully protested the ban, it surely wasn't any left-wing outcry that has caused Trump, who originally started the anti-TikTok sentiment (NPR, 8/6/20 ([link removed]) ), to attempt to save the app’s life in the US.

Shutting down the platform would negatively impact a number of important US business sectors, including the music industry (Guardian, 1/18/25 ([link removed]) ) and advertising (Adweek, 1/3/25 ([link removed]) ). Small businesses, often lauded as the purest form of American entrepreneurialism in the conservative imagination, are acutely at risk (CBS News, 1/17/25 ([link removed]) ); imagine upstart companies several decades ago losing their phone or mail service.

As the Hollywood Reporter (1/18/25 ([link removed]) ) noted:

By 2023, TikTok was playing a major role in our economy. Thousands of retailers came to rely on TikTok Shop to reach customers, and by the following year TikTok was just as much of an ecommerce platform as a social network. TikTok claims it contributed $24.2 billion to the GDP in 2023, and supported some 224,000 American jobs, according to Oxford Economics ([link removed]) , a research firm.

The state wanted to curb people’s access to Chinese apps, yet the ban fails to do that, as many TikTok users flocked to another Chinese app, RedNote (Global Times, 1/14/25 ([link removed]) ; Slate, 1/16/25 ([link removed]) ). (The right has alleged, with little or no evidence, that TikTok is used to advance Chinese state ideology—Fox News, 7/31/23 ([link removed]) ; Free Press, 1/5/25 ([link removed]) ).


** 'Warm spot' for TikTok
------------------------------------------------------------
Reuters: TikTok restores US service after Trump says “we have to save it”

TikTok restored service on January 20 (Reuters, 1/20/25 ([link removed]) ), but as of January 23, the app was still unavailable from Google and Apple's app stores.

Trump, ever the vain showman, found his own success on the app (Reuters, 6/3/24 ([link removed]) ). “Trump has said he has a ‘warm spot’ for TikTok and has vowed to ‘save’ a platform on which his campaign generated ‘billions of views,’” reported USA Today (1/15/25 ([link removed]) ). TikTok’s CEO is feeding Trump’s ego at an opportune time in hopes that Trump could save the app (Washington Post, 1/16/25 ([link removed]) ).

Others on the right are seeing the problems with banning TikTok. The Murdoch-owned New York Post (1/18/25 ([link removed]) ) ran an op-ed saying, “just because the anti-TikTok legislation is legal”—the word the authors are looking for is constitutional, not legal, but you get the idea—“doesn’t necessarily make it wise.” It reminded readers, “We must also grapple with an uncomfortable truth: Despite its Chinese Communist ties, TikTok became an unlikely bastion of free speech during the 2024 election season”—in contrast to "Meta’s Orwellian content moderation.”

Former GOP Wisconsin Rep. Mike Gallagher, a key architect of the ban, took to the Wall Street Journal (1/9/25 ([link removed]) ), also Murdoch-owned, to defend the ban in a piece called “Congress Didn’t Ban TikTok,” which smelled more like last-minute damage control than a policy victory lap.

In other words, after federal lawmakers spent hours pushing through the ban and arguing for it in media outlets, and lawyers used precious resources to craft careful arguments in the court, it was all a waste of time.


** TikTok could still go dark
------------------------------------------------------------
CNN: ‘Shark Tank’s’ Kevin O’Leary and billionaire Frank McCourt want to buy TikTok. One problem: It’s not for sale

Some US investors who hope to take over TikTok in a gun-to-the-head sale say that they don't need to buy the algorithm—a claim some social media observers find dubious (CNN, 1/9/25 ([link removed]) ).

But free speech advocates shouldn’t celebrate just yet. First of all, this could very well be merely a delay in a ban, rather than long-term preservation of the platform. TikTok could very well go dark eventually.

Meanwhile, Elon Musk, whose acquisition of Twitter (now known as X) has crushed free speech on that platform (El País, 5/24/23 ([link removed]) ), created a cesspool of bigotry (Rolling Stone, 1/24/24 ([link removed]) ; Guardian, 9/5/24 ([link removed]) ) precipitated the site’s overall decline (Nieman Reports, 1/31/24 ([link removed]) ; CNN, 9/5/24 ([link removed]) ; NBC News, 11/13/24 ([link removed]) ), is a potential buyer for TikTok
(Bloomberg, 1/14/25 ([link removed]) ). Such a move would consolidate social media under far-right billionaire control.

On Trump’s own social media network, Truth Social (1/19/25 ([link removed]) ), Trump said of a future deal to save TikTok: “I would like the United States to have a 50% ownership position in a joint venture. By doing this, we save TikTok, keep it in good hands and allow it to stay up.” Translation: state control. As is always the case with Trump, it’s hard to say how much he believes this.

Many believe it is unlikely ByteDance would spin off TikTok to another party. “ByteDance would prefer to shut down TikTok rather than sell it if the Chinese company exhausts all legal options,” Reuters (4/26/24 ([link removed] accounts for a small,potential American buyer%2C they said.) ) reported, citing several sources, as this would be tantamount to selling its trade secrets to rivals. It would also be

impossible to divest TikTok with its algorithms, as their intellectual property license is registered under ByteDance in China and thus difficult to disentangle from the parent company.

“Separating the algorithms from TikTok’s US assets would be an extremely complicated procedure,” Reuters said.


** Power to censor
------------------------------------------------------------
New York Post: Trump can save TikTok, but the US must force it out of China’s grip

Putting the lie to the Supreme Court's claim ([link removed]) that the anti-TikTok law was "content agnostic, the New York Post (1/17/25 ([link removed]) ) pointed to the platform's "enormous potential to sway public opinion" as a "prime reason" to force a takeover.

The bipartisan ban on TikTok impacts any app with ties to its Chinese company ByteDance, so other less popular apps, like the video editor CapCut, are also feeling the pinch (USA Today, 1/19/25 ([link removed]) ). The ban’s power to censor is still very much in effect.

Even if Trump simply chooses not to enforce the ban against TikTok, the law remains on the books, and the Supreme Court has provided politicians with judicial justification that free speech concerns can be subverted if you say the words “national security” and “foreign adversary” enough times (New York Times, 1/17/25 ([link removed]) ). With journalists already fearing how Trump might retaliate against the press (FAIR.org, 11/14/24 ([link removed]) ), this Supreme Court precedent will be another legal arrow in the executive branch’s quiver.

RedNote’s popularity has already put it in the crosshairs of the national security state. CBS News (1/16/25 ([link removed]) ) reported that an unnamed US official said “RedNote, just like TikTok, could face an ultimatum to divest, or be banned.” Capitalizing on US government anxiety about RedNote, the Global Times (1/17/25 ([link removed]) ), owned by China’s Communist Party, said, “Those malicious hypes won’t deter the momentum of positive engagement between Chinese and the US netizens.” It’s a cheeky little jab at anti-China demagogues, but that attitude could only encourage more US censorship of anything deemed in control of Beijing.

The lesson of this episode is that jingoistic paranoia is a dangerous disease. The New York Post editorial board (1/17/25 ([link removed]) ), as if channeling George C. Scott in Dr. Strangelove, said the US “must not kowtow to the commies and let China retain control of the company or its app.” The Post and other Trumpists clearly want Washington to snatch TikTok from ByteDance to kick dirt in China’s face in a w0uld-be show of hegemonic dominance.

More tariffs, and war talk about so-called Chinese control of the Panama Canal, have negative consequences for everyday Americans (CounterSpin, 1/10/25 ([link removed]) ). For example, the impending tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China could mean higher prices for consumers (CNBC, 1/20/25 ([link removed]) ), especially for generic drugs (NBC News, 11/22/24 ([link removed]) ), and they could alienate the US from global cooperation to “improve the resilience of supply chains, decarbonize production patterns, or increase workers’ rights” (Center for American Progress, 12/18/24 ([link removed]) ).

And, of course, one of the prime victims of anti-Communist fervor has always been free speech; think HUAC and McCarthyism ([link removed]) . TikTok has a little more time, and could remain a media service for millions of Americans after all, but the battle to defend free speech under the second Trump administration is just beginning.
Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .