View this email .

American Dental Education Association

Volume 3, No. 65, January 14, 2025

Judge Rules Naval Academy May Consider Race in Admissions

 

A federal judge in Baltimore, MD, that the U.S. Naval Academy can continue its race-conscious admissions policies despite the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision rejecting affirmative action in college admissions. The , brought by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), argued that the Academy’s use of race in admissions should be prohibited. However, Judge Richard D. Bennett concluded that the Academy had shown a compelling need for racial diversity in its Officer Corps to ensure national security. He emphasized the history of racial tensions in the military and cited how a lack of diversity had previously undermined military preparedness, making it necessary to reflect the nation’s demographics.

 

The ruling noted that the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision specifically allowed for exceptions in military academies due to their unique role in preparing officers for national defense. Bennett supported this carve-out, noting that diversity in leadership has been a priority for the military for decades, especially after historical racial unrest, such as during the 1960s. The Judge cited the importance of having an Officer Corps that represents the diverse composition of the military and the country it defends. Despite these efforts, there remains a significant underrepresentation of racial minorities among officers, even though more than half of enlisted service members are racial minorities.

 

While the plaintiffs argued for race-neutral alternatives to achieve diversity, the Court found that no such alternatives would meet the government’s needs for diversity in the Officer Corps. The ruling upheld the Naval Academy’s approach, stating it does not use quotas or admissions tracks based solely on race.

 

The decision is seen as a victory for the military’s diversity efforts. The SFFA plans to appeal the ruling.

HHS Updates HIPPA Requirements to Address Cybersecurity Concerns

 

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has to strengthen protections for health care information in the face of growing cyber threats. The proposal requires entities covered by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to adopt updated technical standards while also emphasizing the role of business associates and group health plans in safeguarding electronic health information. Noting the rapid evolution of technology since the last HIPAA Security Rule update, in 2013, the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) highlighted the increased prevalence of electronic health information and the rising frequency of cyberattacks on the health care industry.

 

The proposed rule includes updates to definitions such as “confidentiality” and introduces new terms like “multifactor authentication,” while reinforcing administrative, technical and physical safeguards for protecting electronic health information. It also aims to clarify the 2003 HIPAA Security Rule, which the OCR says has been misunderstood by many health care organizations. For instance, the rule explicitly states that all electronic protected health information (ePHI) is subject to its requirements, countering previous misinterpretations. The proposal emphasizes the importance of implementing and testing modern security measures and requiring annual reviews or updates whenever changes could affect ePHI security. Additionally, it prioritizes resilience, ensuring health care organizations can recover effectively from security breaches.

 

The rule specifically addresses emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing and virtual and augmented reality in health care. It mandates that health care organizations conduct comprehensive risk assessments for these tools, considering factors like the type of ePHI accessed, data disclosures and outputs.

 

A six-month compliance timeline from the Rule's finalization has been proposed to give organizations time to meet the new standards.

State Legislatures Target Higher Education in 2025

 

Legislative sessions across the United States are reform. While debates about tenure and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs remain prominent, lawmakers are expanding their oversight into broader institutional operations, financial management and academic content:

  • Iowa has established a new Oversight for its higher education system. Iowa Rep. Taylor Collins (R), known for opposing DEI programs, will lead this initiative. The scope of the review has sparked debate about whether it represents appropriate legislative oversight or risks excessive interference in academic matters.
  • The Utah State Legislature is examining resource in higher education. Speaker of the Utah House of Representatives Mike Schultz's (R) proposal for a 10% budget reallocation at public universities aims to eliminate underperforming programs, though faculty members worry this could particularly impact liberal arts departments. These discussions align with Gov. Spencer Cox's (R) emphasis on better matching education to workforce demands.
  • In Texas, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) is scrutinizing the of faculty senates in university operations. This initiative reflects growing questions nationwide about traditional shared governance approaches between faculty and administration. Many academics argue that reducing faculty input could harm the quality of educational decision-making.
  • Ohio legislators are likely to revisit , which previously advanced through the Senate but not the House of Representatives. The legislation would restrict DEI training requirements, modify tenure protections and mandate efforts to increase viewpoint diversity on campus. The bill has divided those who believe it addresses ideological imbalances from those who see it threatening academic independence.

These state-level actions represent an evolving approach to higher education policy, where legislatures are taking a more active role in shaping institutional practices. Their decisions could fundamentally alter how colleges and universities operate, affecting everyone from professors to students.

ADEA Advocacy in Action

This appears weekly in the ADEA Advocate to summarize and provide direct links to recent advocacy actions taken by ADEA. Please let us know what you think and how we might improve its usefulness.

 

Issues and Resources

  • ADEA on teledentistry
  • ADEA on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on U.S. Dental Schools
  • ADEA policy regarding overprescription of antibiotics
  • For a full list of ADEA memos, briefs and letters click .

The is published weekly. Its purpose is to keep ADEA members abreast of federal and state issues and events of interest to the academic dentistry and the dental and research communities.

 

©2025

American Dental Education Association

655 K Street, NW, Suite 800

Washington, DC 20001

Tel: 202-289-7201

Website:

twitter
Unsubscribe

B. Timothy Leeth, CPA

ADEA Chief Advocacy Officer

 

Bridgette DeHart, J.D.

ADEA Director of Federal Relations and Advocacy

 

Phillip Mauller, M.P.S.

ADEA Senior Director of State Relations and Advocacy

 

Contact Us:

Higher Logic