Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]


** OPINION
------------------------------------------------------------

Good Friday morning. I wrap up the week with a newsletter on the shorter side because I’ve been hit by some sort of flu-like bug. Hopefully, I’ll be back to full strength next week.

But before wrapping up the week, I wanted to mention an important case before the Supreme Court today: the future of TikTok.


** TikTok gets its day in court — the Supreme Court
------------------------------------------------------------
A TikTok sign is displayed on top of their building in Culver City, Calif., last month. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel, File)

The Associated Press’ Mark Sherman calls it ([link removed]) “one of the most important cases of the social media age.” The New York Times’ Adam Liptak writes ([link removed]) , “When the Supreme Court hears arguments on Friday over whether protecting national security requires TikTok to be sold or closed, the justices will be working in the shadow of three First Amendment precedents, all influenced by the climate of their times and by how much the justices trusted the government.”

So, yeah, it’s a big one.

The U.S government enacted a law that says ByteDance, the Chinese owner of TikTok, must sell the social media company or else TikTok will be banned in this country on Jan. 19. The U.S. fears the Chinese government could force ByteDance to hand over data that would compromise U.S. users. TikTok has said it has not shared U.S. data with the Chinese government and would never do so.

But the case has now reached the Supreme Court as TikTok argues forcing the app to shut down violates their First Amendment rights.

The Wall Street Journal’s Jacob Gershman and Sarah E. Needleman explain ([link removed]) , “The new law doesn’t prohibit the use of TikTok, but it requires Apple and Google to remove TikTok from their app stores by that date. People who don’t already have TikTok on their phone or tablet won’t be able to download it from there. The law also bars U.S. internet hosting services and data-storage providers from supporting the app. Companies that defy the ban could face civil penalties that have the potential to reach billions of dollars. While the social-media app won’t suddenly vanish from Americans’ phones and tablets, experts in legal compliance and mobile-app technology say TikTok could still be usable in the short term and envision it dying a slow death with progressively eroding functionality.”

Then there’s the Donald Trump factor. The deadline on this matter is, as I mentioned, Jan. 19 — one day before Trump is sworn in as president.

Sherman writes for the AP, “Working on a tight deadline, the justices also have before them a plea from President-elect Donald Trump, who has dropped his earlier support for a ban, to give him and his new administration time to reach a ‘political resolution’ and avoid deciding the case. It’s unclear if the court will take the Republican president-elect’s views — a highly unusual attempt to influence a case — into account.”

And why does all this matter? Liptak explains it well: “The court’s decision will determine the fate of a powerful and pervasive cultural phenomenon that uses a sophisticated algorithm to feed a personalized array of short videos to its 170 million users in the United States. For many of them, and particularly younger ones, TikTok has become a leading source of information and entertainment.”

For more on this case, check out USA Today’s Maureen Groppe with “Why the Supreme Court is likely to side against 170 million TikTok users.” ([link removed]) And why might the Supreme Court rule against TikTok? Because of those national security threats.

Also, check out The New York Times’ Sapna Maheshwari with “TikTok Stars and Marketers Brace for App’s Disappearance This Month.” ([link removed])

A MESSAGE FROM POYNTER
[link removed]


** The 2025 Poynter Journalism Prizes are now open!
------------------------------------------------------------

This contest recognizes the best of U.S. journalism from 2024. Enter your work ([link removed]) in categories that honor great writing, accountability, public service and justice reporting, innovation, diversity leadership, column and editorial writing, and First Amendment work. Deadline: Feb. 14.

Enter now ([link removed]) !


** Correction
------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t know where my head was while writing Thursday’s newsletter, but in the first reference, I messed up the name of USA Today Washington bureau chief Susan Page, who had an exclusive interview with President Joe Biden. I’m a huge ’70s TV fan, including “The Partridge Family” and I typed out Susan DAY (yes, I know it was Susan Dey, so I stumbled all the way around). Apologies to Susan Page.


** More media news, tidbits and interesting links for your weekend review …
------------------------------------------------------------
* Here’s the latest live coverage ([link removed]) of the Southern California wildfires from the Los Angeles Times.
* Also from the L.A. Times, Connor Sheets with “‘This is our house’: Mom and son fought off Palisades fire with pump, hose and pool water.” ([link removed])
* The New York Times’ Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs and Mike Baker with “In the Palisades, an Evacuation Disaster Was Years in the Making.” ([link removed])
* MSNBC’s Katy Tur, who grew up in Pacific Palisades, with “What it feels like watching your childhood neighborhood burn to the ground.” ([link removed])
* ABC News’ Matt Gutman with a reporter’s notebook: “The apocalyptic destruction I witnessed in the Pacific Palisades fire.” ([link removed])
* From “Good Morning America,” ([link removed]) Paris Hilton shares an emotional video on Instagram saying no one should have to watch their home burn to the ground on live television.
* Devastating photos ([link removed]) of the wildfires’ damage from CNN.
* The Associated Press’ David Bauder with “No more fact-checking for Meta. How will this change media — and the pursuit of truth?” ([link removed])
* The International Fact-Checking Network at Poynter with “An open letter to Mark Zuckerberg from the world’s fact-checkers, nine years later.” ([link removed])
* In a guest essay for The New York Times, Julia Angwin with “This Is What It Looks Like When Mark Zuckerberg Runs Out of Ideas.” ([link removed])
* Mediaite’s Alex Griffing with “Another Exec Bowing to MAGA?’ HuffPo Editor Slams Parent Company CEO Over Looming Newsroom Cuts.” ([link removed])
* Politico’s Katelyn Fossett has a Q&A with Mouaz Moustafa, the executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a nonprofit established to respond to attacks on civilians by former dictator Bashar al-Assad in “He Went to Syria With Tulsi Gabbard. He Has Some Big Concerns.” ([link removed])
* Nieman Lab’s Joshua Benton with “That time Rupert Murdoch endorsed Jimmy Carter (no, really).” ([link removed])
* Tweet of the day from CNN contributor David Axelrod ([link removed]) : “As I watched today's funeral, I wondered how Trump processed all those tributes to Jimmy Carter's honesty and integrity; his belief in the fellowship of man and the dignity and worth in every human being; his commitment to human rights as a pillar of American foreign policy?”
* Nicole Stockdale has been named executive editor of The News & Observer in Raleigh, North Carolina, and The Herald-Sun in Durham. She replaces Bill Church, who left after three years last summer to become executive editor of the Santa Fe New Mexican. The News & Observer's Richard Stradling has more ([link removed]) .
* The Washington Post’s Ty Burr reviews the movie about ABC’s coverage of the attacks at the 1972 Munich Olympics: “‘September 5’: A gripping drama set at the ’72 Olympics.” ([link removed])
* And here’s The Atlantic’s Shirley Li with “When Crisis Coverage Became Irresistible.” ([link removed])
* Awful Announcing’s Ben Axelrod with “Longtime NFL reporter Jim Trotter casually reveals he’s retired.” ([link removed])


** More resources for journalists
------------------------------------------------------------
* Are you an up-and-coming newsroom manager ([link removed]) ? Apply by Feb. 14.
* Transform Local Crime Coverage ([link removed]) in your newsroom. Application period ends Jan. 17.
* Cover critical issues surrounding child protection and the foster care system. Apply by Feb. 14. ([link removed])

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) .
[link removed]
Help Poynter strengthen journalism, truth and democracy. ([link removed])
GIVE NOW ([link removed])

ADVERTISE ([link removed]) // DONATE ([link removed]) // LEARN ([link removed]) // JOBS ([link removed])
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here. ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] mailto:[email protected]?subject=Feedback%20for%20Poynter
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2025
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can change your subscription preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe from all Poynter emails ([link removed]) .