From Democracy Docket <newsletters@democracydocket.com>
Subject North Carolina Supreme Court race certification halted
Date January 10, 2025 12:05 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Jimmy Carter’s record on voting rights

[link removed]

Friday, January 10


** ON THE DOCKET THIS WEEK
------------------------------------------------------------


** * State Supreme Court halts certification of Justice Allison Riggs’ reelection
* New Year, new Congress, same grievances
* Remembering the late president’s record on voting rights

------------------------------------------------------------


** NORTH CAROLINA
------------------------------------------------------------


** State Supreme Court halts certification of Justice Allison Riggs’ reelection
------------------------------------------------------------

If you thought that three vote counts — including two recounts —would be enough to settle the contentious North Carolina Supreme Court race ([link removed]) , you’d be wrong. Despite these recounts — two of which were requested by the GOP candidate Jefferson Griffin — confirming that incumbent Justice Allison Riggs (D) won, Griffin is still challenging the results of the election.

At the heart of the issue is the North Carolina State Board of Elections’ (NCSBE) decision to reject Griffin’s challenges to more than 60,000 ballots in the race — ballots cast by voters who allegedly ([link removed]) did not provide the required identification information when registering to vote. This has prompted not one ([link removed]) , not two ([link removed]) , but three ([link removed]) different lawsuits split between state and federal courts challenging the results of the election. On Tuesday, the Republican-majority North Carolina Supreme Court blocked
([link removed]) the certification of the race while litigation is ongoing and said it would hear Griffin’s case challenging the NCSBE’s decision.

For now, everything hinges on what the state Supreme Court will do. In theory, the state’s highest court could ultimately change the results of the election, though in her dissent of the Court taking up the case, Justice Anita Earls — the only other Democrat on the bench besides Riggs — argued it’s highly unlikely the case will succeed and that “the public interest requires that the Court not interfere with the ordinary course of democratic processes as set by statute and the state constitution.” Republican Justice Richard Dietz agreed ([link removed]) with Earls to not take up Griffin’s case and, in a scathing dissent, said, “At bottom, the timing of Griffin’s claims speaks volumes about their substance. By waiting until after the votes were cast and the results tallied, Griffin seeks to retroactively rewrite the rules of the election to tilt the playing field in his favor.”

The ongoing drama in North Carolina has reverberations well beyond the state. “The crisis of democracy didn’t end with [President-elect Donald] Trump’s victory—it got worse,” Ben Wikler, candidate for chair of the Democratic National Committee, said ([link removed]) on X. “When North Carolina’s state Supreme Court is blocking certification of a state Supreme Court election, the house is on fire.” Read more about the challenge to the race here ([link removed]) . ([link removed])
As the inauguration approaches, we remain committed to holding the next administration accountable. Our focus will always be on putting readers first — sign up to become a premium member ([link removed]) for $120/year and stay updated while helping us fight for a stronger democracy!
** U.S. HOUSE
------------------------------------------------------------


** New Year, new Congress, same grievances
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]

The newly elected GOP-controlled 119th Congress sprang into this week by… picking up right where the last Congress left off: trying to disenfranchise voters.

Specifically, in the U.S. House of Representatives, Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) reintroduced ([link removed]) the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, a bill that failed to pass the Democratic-controlled Senate in the last Congress that would require anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship. Prior to the SAVE Act’s reintroduction on Tuesday, the House passed ([link removed]) a rules package that detailed 12 of the chamber’s legislative priorities — including a nationwide proof of citizenship bill as 10th on the list. In the Senate, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said ([link removed]) he plans to introduce the bill in the coming days.

Throughout 2024 the GOP went hard to spread ([link removed]) the false narrative of widespread noncitizen voting in federal elections — which culminated in the passage of the SAVE Act in the House. “States already have effective safeguards in place to verify voters’ eligibility and maintain the accuracy of voter rolls,” the Biden administration said in a statement after the bill was passed. “This bill would do nothing to safeguard our elections, but it would make it much harder for all eligible Americans to register to vote and increase the risk that eligible voters are purged from voter rolls.”

Now, with a new GOP majority in the Senate and Trump’s return to the White House, Congressional Republicans are once again trying to pass the SAVE Act, which will ultimately make it harder for thousands of people to vote. In a statement about the priority legislation that the House plans to push, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R) said ([link removed]) these bills “makes clear that House Republicans will deliver on their promises of securing the border, unleashing American energy, protecting American elections, protecting innocent life, and returning to common sense.” Read more about the SAVE Act here ([link removed]) . ([link removed])


** JIMMY CARTER
------------------------------------------------------------


** Remembering the late president’s record on voting rights
------------------------------------------------------------

Jimmy Carter, the 39th President of the United States, was laid to rest on Thursday. Though he was only a one-term president, the former Democratic governor of Georgia left a lasting, positive impact on democracy — well beyond his four tumultuous years in the White House.

One of Carter's overlooked legacies was his work to protect voting rights and ensure every eligible American could vote. Notably, shortly after Carter came to the White House he sent a letter to Congress urging them to pass a package of electoral reforms — including universal same-day voter registration, closing a key campaign finance loophole and abolishing the Electoral College, among other reforms. Though the package initially had bipartisan support, opposition from the proto-Reaganist New Right — including a savvy disinformation campaign by the nascent Heritage Foundation that falsely promoted how same-day registration could allow “eight million illegal aliens in the U.S.” to vote, according to TIME ([link removed]) — ultimately doomed it.

But Carter continued to advocate for voting rights after he left the White House. In 2005, Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker (R) co-chaired the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, which culminated in producing a lengthy report on how the country could better expand ballot access and election integrity. The Carter-Baker Commission, as it’s known these days, made some key recommendations that are still supported — but have yet to be implemented — by voting rights advocates today, like a state-led universal voting registration system, improving ballot access for people with disabilities and allowing most people with past felony convictions to vote.

But, of the 87 recommendations of the Carter-Baker Commission, there’s one specific recommendation weaponized by Republicans these days. As The New Republic noted ([link removed]) in 2021, the report’s recommendation to implement voter ID laws to prevent fraud is often used by “conservatives looking for ammunition to discredit election results and restrict voting rights.”


** OPINION
------------------------------------------------------------


** Courts Are the Last Guardrail
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]

With the certification of Trump’s election victory Jan. 6 — four years after a very different, violent certification day that now lives in infamy — it’s clear that the guardrails on MAGA extremism are mostly gone. It does not reside in government institutions or norms. It will not be found in legacy media newsrooms where both-sides journalism is the order of the day. Nor will you find any courage in the boardrooms of large corporations as they bow and scrape before Trump.

That leaves only the courts, Marc writes in this week’s column. “If there is a guardrail protecting democracy — and that is very much an if — it exists in the black robes of our state and federal judiciary.” Read more here ([link removed]) . ([link removed])


** VIDEO SERIES
------------------------------------------------------------


** The race for a new DNC chair is on
------------------------------------------------------------

In our latest video series, Marc speaks with the candidates and their vision for the Democratic Party. Check out his interviews with Ben Wikler, Ken Martin, James Skoufis and Martin O’Malley here ([link removed]) .


** What We’re Doing
------------------------------------------------------------

After it was quietly pulled ([link removed]) from the streaming service Max, Democracy Docket staff’s perennial favorite political drama The West Wing is, in fact, once again available ([link removed]) to stream. This is great news for DD Social Media Manager and West Wing superfan Paige Moskowitz, who says that the show “is great because it is incredible TV that takes you through every emotion and holds up well over 20 years later. It's a semi-accurate look at how politics works and shows you what a functional administration can get done.”
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

This is a weekly newsletter that provides the highlights of the week, along with our analysis and recommendations for how you can get involved. For questions about your subscription or general support, visit our FAQ page here ([link removed]) . You canupdate your preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) .

View email in browser ([link removed]) .
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis