[[link removed]]

THE DRAMA AND SUFFERING OF THE WORLD CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP  
[[link removed]]


 

J.C. Hallman
December 27, 2024
The Nation
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ A dispatch from the pivotal Game 11 in Singapore that helped make
Gukesh Dommaraju an 18-year-old chess champion. _

Ding Liren, top right, and Gukesh Dommaraju, top left, are seen
during Game 1 of the FIDE World Chess Championship 2024 in Singapore
on November 25, 2024., Then Chih Wey / Xinhua via Getty Images

 

S_ingapore_—I made three associations upon entering the playing hall
for Game 11 of the World Chess Championship match recently completed
on Sentosa Island, Singapore. The hall was a cavernous space with 400
seats (comfortable Chesterfield-style armchairs for VIPs, dining
chairs for press and the public) facing four six-by-nine-foot panes of
two-way glass that looked into a separate playing chamber: Observers
viewed the players, the game table, and the board and pieces in
profile. First, the milieu recalled for me a recent experience
of attending a public execution
[[link removed]]:
office chairs positioned in rows to observe a dramatic procedure
unfolding on the other side of a row of windows. Second, because the
playing hall was dim and the playing chamber brightly lit, the
atmosphere recalled the dungeony glass-walled prison cell of Hannibal
Lecter
[[link removed]],
minus the airholes. Last, the atmosphere dredged up a whiff of what
the exhibits must have been like, more than a century ago, when
hoity-toity Europeans flocked to view human beings, mostly Africans,
on display in so-called “human zoos.”

This last one begins to hint at the wide range of politics that lurked
just beneath the surface of Game 11, and the match as a whole: For the
first time in more than 130 years of chess championships, there was no
white man on either side of the chessboard.

The players were a study in contrasts. Chinese national Ding Liren is
32 and was defending the championship for the first time since winning
the crown almost two years ago. Ding is boyish in appearance, looking,
I suspect, much as he did when he was 10. His opponent, Gukesh
Dommaraju, is an 18-year-old Indian man who was attempting to become
the youngest world champion in history. Gukesh looks well beyond his
years—he could pass for 40, and he probably never looked 10, not
even when he was 5.

There was little dawdling, and Game 11 began with announcements from
the event’s host, Maurice Ashley, who in 1999 became the first Black
grandmaster in the history of the game.

“Welcome ladies and gentlemen, and children of all ages,” Ashley
began, a curious phrase often associated with the circus or Walt
Disney
[[link removed]] and
which Ashley used at the start of each game, seemingly in reference to
the cartoonish experience of Sentosa Island. Once upon a time, Sentosa
was a small island, but it has since been expanded by Singapore’s
extensive land reclamation efforts. Loosely described, Sentosa Island
is a beached Disney cruise with Harry Potter exhibits, high-end
shopping, and, for two weeks in the middle of December 2024, chess.

Expectations were low for Game 11. In part, this was because
expectations for the world championship, in general, have been low
ever since Magnus Carlsen, universally regarded as the world’s top
player, refused to defend his title for a sixth time after first
becoming world champion in 2013. Carlsen hasn’t ever fully explained
his decision to step away from the world championship, and when the
match in Singapore was complete, he insisted that he would not attempt
to regain the title: “I’m not part of that circus anymore.” The
championship has endured questions of legitimacy before (e.g., Bobby
Fischer, who similarly refused to defend the title), and even Ding,
who more or less accidentally qualified to vie for the championship in
2022, may have been uncertain as to the validity of his status as
world champion. Indeed, the moment Ding won the title over Russian
player Ian Nepomniachtchi, he appeared to crumble and sink—ever
since, his play has been uneven, and there have been serious questions
about his mental health.

Concerns over legitimacy and sanity appeared to have been resolved in
the first game in Singapore: Ding scored an impressive victory. After
a draw in Game 2, Gukesh struck back in Game 3. But games 4 through 10
were all draws, and this also lowered expectations for Game 11. As
though to embody fears that this world championship, like others in
recent years, would descend into a string of boring games, Hikaru
Nakamura, one of the world’s top players and the game’s most
successful online personality, titled his video analysis of Game 10,
“NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
[[link removed]]”

It soon became apparent that Game 11 would be different, however. The
players started with four relatively quick moves—and then Ding
paused. He thought for 10 minutes.

Historically, the length of games of “classical” chess have been
relatively consistent. If it’s fair to say that a baseball game
might last three hours, with potential to go shorter or longer, then a
good benchmark for chess might be five or six hours. The reality is
more complex, and the exact details shift from tournament to
tournament; in Singapore, each player had 120 minutes to make their
first 40 moves, and each would receive an additional 30 minutes after
reaching “time control.”

That’s why Ding’s 10-minute think raised eyebrows. The beginnings
of chess games are often rote affairs, players “blitzing” through
the first eight or 10 or 12 moves of well-known positions. To think
for 10 minutes on move five was strange.

Then it got stranger. Ding thought for another 10 minutes, and then
another 20. And then more. When he finally made his fifth move, he had
exhausted half of his allotted time; one hour and two minutes had
passed. Gukesh had used 32 seconds.

Whatever was happening, it seemed, wasn’t going to be like what had
preceded it. This was apparent from Ding’s appearance and manner:
Even early in the game he began exhibiting twitchy body-rockings,
peculiar face-wiping behaviors, and erratic blinking. It was hard to
imagine that he would be doing anything other than suffering for the
next five hours. Already, the world champion’s behavior offered a
reminder that the original name of Sentosa Island had been Pulau
Blakang Mati, sometimes translated as Island of Woe.

Ihad been heartened by the image of a Black grandmaster introducing a
game between a Chinese player and an Indian player—India is often
cited as the birthplace of chess, though some sources claim the origin
stretches back even further, to the I Ching in China. Later, when
Ashley told me that the significance of the picture of a Black man, an
Indian man, and a Chinese man gathered together around a chessboard
hadn’t really occurred to him, I believed him. Skill in chess tends
to erase color lines.

Regardless, race wasn’t the only politics afoot in Singapore.

In 2022, 44 top Russian chess players cosigned a letter
[[link removed]] to
Russian President Vladimir Putin, calling for an end to the war in
Ukraine. “Chess teaches you to be responsible for your actions,”
the players wrote:

Each move is meaningful and a mistake can bring you to a fatal point
of no return. This used to be a sport, but now the [sic] human lives,
human rights and freedoms, human dignity, the present and future of
our countries are at stake.

The Russian players’ call for peace was the most recent instance of
a long history of cross-pollination between chess and international
politics, most often involving Russia, where chess has a unique status
as an intellectual pursuit. Of course, there were political dimensions
to the Cold War–era 1972 match between the Soviet Union’s Boris
Spassky and the US’s Bobby Fischer; in 2008, former world champion
Garry Kasparov made a brief run in the Russian presidential elections
(a fervent Putin critic, Kasparov has dismissed the 2024 match in
Singapore as not being a true world championship, because, as measured
by Elo rating, neither player ranked in the top four in the world;
Gukesh, fifth, Ding 22nd); and an unsuccessful effort to have 2016’s
world championship match held at Trump Tower wound up in _The Mueller
Report_, the suggestion being that Russia had attempted to use chess
to curry favor with Trump.

The 2024 match included no Russians, but I admit to having wondered
whether Ding or Gukesh held opinions about their respective
countries’ stances on the three-year-old Ukraine war. To use a chess
metaphor, both China and India might be said to have been playing
“waiting moves” on the war—that is, making moves that have no
purpose other than to wait and see what happens. (It should be noted
that, although chess metaphors are common in politics and
war—endgame, stalemate—chess players tend to cringe when non-chess
players employ chess terms to describe anything at all.) Would either
player wish to exploit their moment on the global stage to issue a
statement the world might hear?

On the Island of Woe, most people did not watch Game 11 from inside
the playing hall. Rather, after the first half-hour of the game, most
attendees exited to spend time in the Fan Zone, a large room nearby
filled with tables for chess playing, and several dozen floor pillows
on which to recline while watching two large televisions playing a
live commentary stream being filmed two rooms away. The designated
chess space also included the Experiential Zone, more an anteroom than
a separate chamber, and it was here that the chess glitterati gathered
before games as though it was the Met Gala, people milling about and
chatting among exhibits put on display by the event’s primary
sponsor, Google.

The exhibits told the story of the rise of Google’s AI companion,
Gemini, through the narrative of English tech company Deep Mind, which
helped launch the AI revolution by creating “engines” to conquer
the games of go and chess. Acquired by Google in 2014, Deep Mind set
its sights next on more substantive problems: protein structures for
medical research, weather prediction, algorithms for mathematics and
computing. Most simply put, Big Tech had used chess as a pawn in a
larger campaign to tackle the world’s most intractable problems.

Back in the playing hall, after several more moves of Game 11, Gukesh
settled in to use some of his own time. This provided time for me to
observe both the players and the observers observing them. The hall
was mostly silent—a number of attendants had no other job than to
parade slowly through the room holding signs that said “Silence,
please!”—but there was a steady thrum of whispered Mandarin, and
four Indian boys seated behind me, barely younger than Gukesh, proved
unable to fend off a hormonal excitement that left them chatty and
giggly. The match also appeared to be a cheap date night for couples
scattered here and there, most often the men pointing at the televised
examination boards and attempting in coarse whispers to explain to
their partners what was interesting about the position.

In the playing chamber, in contrast to Ding’s nervous twitching—as
well as his habit of plucking small bits of detritus from his eyebrows
and tossing them over his shoulder—Gukesh’s manners were all James
Bond: He shuffled himself upright in an unrelentingly ergonomic chair,
high-backed and curvy with elaborate armrests—office furniture as
imagined by _Game of Thrones_—and tugged the cuffs of his shirt to
their proper length under his sport coat. At the post-game chess
conference, Gukesh would claim that he believed he was lost during the
game, and was nearly falling apart at this and other moments, but to
outward appearances he was as steady as a piece of metal floating in a
magnetic field.

As he arrived for Game 11, Gukesh was met with cheers of “Long Live,
Gukesh!” by a small team of Indian journalists. Ding had fans as
well, but not cheerleaders, and despite the differences in their body
language, both men, now that Game 11 had hit its stride, set about
augmenting their concentration with a variety of face-touchings. Palms
clamped over the mouth, double-brow-clenchings, and fist-in-cheek
chinrests are so common to chess players mid-think as to suggest an
untested hypothesis about a relationship between face-touching and
improved intellectual performance.

Game 11 got weird again when Gukesh sank into a “deep think.” An
hour advantage on a chess clock is nothing to scoff at, but that’s
exactly what Gukesh did. It’s true that he had a vulnerable
“backward pawn” (a center pawn that can’t be protected by
another pawn), but the chess engine that was monitoring the game in
the commentary studio saw nothing particularly definitive about the
position. (These days, sophisticated programs evaluate positions
instantly, and even top grandmasters defer to what one of the
commentators in Singapore, English grandmaster David Howell, called
“our silicon friends.”)

This was less true in the media center, which was a far-off room
reserved for several dozen journalists covering the event from Spain,
Germany, Uzbekistan, and, of course, China and India. The modern chess
media is two-fold. On the one hand, there are the old-school reporters
who are a blend of what one imagines baseball scouts and war
correspondents to be like: grizzled men who haven’t tucked in a
shirt in 15 years. On the other, there are younger and cooler
writers—attractive women and hipsters—who likely think more in
terms of content creation than article writing. (Netflix’s_ The
Queen’s Gambit _was a boon for the chess world, but there are
concerns that while many women have been brought into the game, there
has been a tendency to objectify and sexualize them—the Botez
sisters, popular online chess personalities, are the game’s answer
to the Kardashians.)

The old-school journalists thought Gukesh’s deep think revealed his
relative weakness as a player. A Spanish journalist, a man with an
Uncle Fester vibe who I was told had attended every world championship
match since the 1970s, claimed that Kasparov would have calculated for
less than a minute before playing c5, pushing a pawn forward. Another
journalist agreed that c5 was the obvious move. Still another mumbled,
“Unbelievable! Unbelievable!” as Gukesh’s deep think stretched
beyond 30 minutes, then 50 minutes.

For the record, c5 was _not _the correct move. The move that Gukesh
finally played was, in fact, the best choice according to the chess
engine, but he played it after a full hour had passed. The time on the
clocks was equal once again; each player had made a total of 11 moves.

Game 11 would prove to be pivotal to the match, and it would include a
telling maneuver, a dramatic sacrifice rarely seen in world
championship games. I will return to the story of Game 11, but first
two spoiler alerts: A few days later, Gukesh clinched the match,
winning 7.5-6.5, when Ding made a dramatic blunder in “time
trouble” at the end of the 14th and final game. Also, I decided not
to ask either player about Ukraine.

I did, however, speak with Arkady Dvorkovich, the current president of
the International Chess Federation (FIDE). In 2000, I interviewed
Dvorkovich’s predecessor at FIDE, the wacky Kalmyk politician,
Kirsan Ilymzhinov, for my 2003 book, _The Chess Artist_
[[link removed]].

Dvorkovich, however, is different from Ilymzhinov. While never a
Moscow insider, Ilyumzhinov had arguably wielded more power, and had
once been likened to Saddam Hussein and Moammar El-Gadhafi, on
suspicion that he had ordered the murder of a journalist.

Still, Dvorkovich was cagey and mysterious. From 2012to 2018, he
served as deputy prime minister to Dmitry Medvedev. In 2022, _Mother
Jones
[[link removed]] _reported
that Dvorkovich was ousted from his government position for being one
of the only Russian officials to speak out publicly against the war in
Ukraine. Another former deputy prime minister accused Dvorkovich of
betraying Russia and hiding “behind a chessboard.” At the same
time, Ukrainian chess players were seeking to have Dvorkovich ousted
from FIDE, claiming that he was “a person who [is] responsible for
the formation of Russia’s aggressive foreign policy.” More
troublingly, Dvorkovich had been accused of repeating Russian
propaganda about Nazism in Ukraine (“There is no place for Nazism or
domination of some countries over others,” he told a Russian
newspaper in 2022), and of questioning, in 2015, whether Russia was
actually annexing Crimea (“We know that there are some Russians that
fight on the side of those regions in Ukraine—some people that are
coming on their own and fight,” he told the BBC).

We sat down in an impromptu FIDE office sandwiched between the Fan
Zone and the commentary studio, and at first Dvorkovich was pleasant
and more than happy to recall his days at Duke University, studying
economics, and to explain that while he didn’t have FIDE chess
rating of his own, he’d been told that he played at approximately
the master level. When I turned to asking about Ukraine, Dvorkovich
clammed up. He made the point that the chess world was hugely diverse,
and therefore unruly. I persisted. I asked him if he stood by the
quotations that appeared to defend conquered regions of Ukraine as
Russian territory and to suggest that Nazism was a valid rationale for
the conflict. He refused further comment and referred me to _Mother
Jones _and the Russian article
[[link removed]] as pieces that
accurately represented his views. He said he would arrange for
FIDE’s public relations officer, Anna Volkova, to supply me with the
articles. In fact, Volkova did, but even this underscored the messy
tangle of chess’s internal politics: Volkova was one of the 44
Russian chess players who had cosigned the letter to Putin demanding
an end to the war in Ukraine.

I did venture to ask Dvorkovich if there was a chess metaphor that
might explain Russia’s current predicament: the Russian occupation
of the Donbas region, the Russian territory under Ukraine’s control,
the fall of Syria. He didn’t like the question, of course. He
insisted that he was not speaking directly of the war, but he did say
that two things were “probably really important” to consider with
where things stood in Ukraine.

“One, to understand what kind of endgame you want to have, some
vision of the future…. In chess, it’s very important…. And the
second thing is that one game is just one game, the next day, or the
same day, you have another game. So you should think about not just
the game you are playing now, but the future…. It’s not about
achieving the best possible result just now, or defeating your
opponent…. Nobody wants to lose, but a draw is still a good
result.”

The drama of chess games remains mostly abstract: Decisive tactics go
unplayed; threatened “lines” are never realized. Hence, it may be
the case that for a lay person sitting and watching 10 or 20 minutes
of two players thinking, until one of them makes a move, is all that
is necessary to get a sense of the atmosphere of a game of high-level
chess. It’s incredibly fraught, of course, if for no other reason
than that everyone present behaves as though a dangerous experiment or
tense diplomatic negotiation is underway. Kibitzing a world
championship chess game is the common ground between watching a poker
player decide whether to call a million-dollar all-in wager and
waiting for the white smoke that signals the selection of a new pope.
In each case, the process remains inscrutable, and the drama
accumulates with time.

The chess world is currently indulging in the pomp and circumstance of
the selection of a new champion. In time, it will come to be noted
that the match that crowned an 18-year-old the 18th world champion was
largely determined by time. Ding blundered in the final game because
he had run low on time. He lost Game 3 when his time ran out
completely. And Game 11 hinged on time as well.

After the time on the clocks equalized, with both players retaining 50
minutes to play 30 moves, the time advantage seesawed back and forth.
The engine didn’t show a significant advantage one way or the other,
but there was a widely held belief was that if Ding could eliminate
most of the pieces from the board, he would have an edge. It never got
that far. Gukesh made several counter-intuitive moves with his
remaining knight, and Ding’s time began to run low—six minutes to
calculate deep into 12 moves before time control. Ding began to bob
and cough almost constantly. His twitching was so pathological that
had he stroked out, right there in front of us, we all would have
said, “All the signs were there, why didn’t anyone do anything?”
Distracted and disturbed, Ding overlooked a queen sacrifice—one of
the rarest events in the game and almost unheard of at the world
championship level—and he instantly resigned.

What followed was a minor stampede to another building for the
post-game press conference. Ashley, who moderated the conferences,
announced from the get-go that the process would be different this
time around. Rather than both players answering questions together, a
few questions would be posed to Ding, and then he would be permitted
to leave in order to “compose himself.” Ashley later explained
that when he first saw Ding in the moments following the game, he knew
that he needed to get him out of there. This is why I decided not to
ask Ding about politics or Ukraine.

The next day, Ashley told me that Ding’s loss in Game 11 was very
different from his loss in Game 3, when he’d simply run out of time.
“When you…make a blunder like that,” Ashley said, “it’s a
very different feeling.” To “get flagged,” or lose on time, as
in Game 3, is like your position having cancer. You have time to
process the approaching demise. But to suffer a queen sacrifice in a
world championship game, that is a sudden and violent ending,
practically a humiliation. It was like walking across the street,
Ashley said, thinking you’re OK, and then suddenly a truck comes out
of nowhere, and boom, you’re _dead._

Over the next couple of days, both Ashley and Dvorkovich strongly
objected to my suggestions that there was a meaningful connection
between the sport of chess and war and politics. This was peculiar, I
thought. FIDE has been led by two politicians since 1995, and the live
commentary of the match frequently cut away to short videos in which
Google’s Gemini was asked to describe chess with brief analogies.
Chess, Gemini told the audience, was as a kind of war.

I wanted to register an objection. No connection between sport and
politics? Tell that to American football players who kneel during the
national anthem. Tell that to basketball coaches who speak at
political conventions. Tell that to sprinters who raise fists on the
podium in Mexico City.

To all appearances and by every account, the new chess world champion
is a humble, gracious, and well-spoken man. However, at the final
press conference on the Island of Woe, surrounded by “children of
all ages,” Gukesh did say something peculiar. Reflecting on 10 years
of dedicated effort—that is, since he was 8 years old—he said,
“I don’t remember much from my childhood.” This is why I
declined to question him as well. A man who cannot remember being a
child perhaps still is one, and it may be inappropriate to ask
political questions of even a champion when he still has a lot of
growing up to do.

More from J.C. Hallman
[[link removed]]

* The Painfully Blithe Business of Modern Executions
[[link removed]] August
3, 2023
* Like It or Not, Cancel Culture Is Free Speech
[[link removed]] June
6, 2023

_J.C. HALLMAN is the author of Say Anarcha: A Young Woman, a Devious
Surgeon, and the Harrowing Birth of Modern Women’s Health
[[link removed]] and The
Chess Artist: Genius, Obsession, and the World’s Oldest Game
[[link removed]]._

_Copyright c 2024 THE NATION. Reprinted with permission. May not be
reprinted without permission
[[link removed]].
Distributed by PARS International Corp
[[link removed]]. _

_Founded by abolitionists in 1865, The Nation has chronicled the
breadth and depth of political and cultural life, from the debut of
the telegraph to the rise of Twitter, serving as a critical,
independent, and progressive voice in American journalism._

_Please support progressive journalism. Get a digital subscription
[[link removed]] to
The Nation for just $24.95!_

_Thank you for reading The Nation! _

_We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many
examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we
publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues,
uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and
perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160
years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on
issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug._

_In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity,
independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to
do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking
readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support
The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors
Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team
of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to
report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take
weeks or months to report, and much more._

_There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the
presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for
bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is
only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate
today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just
the price of a cup of coffee._

_The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or
advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work
possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue
to hold the powerful accountable._

_Thank you for your generosity._

_Donate $10 monthly to The Nation.
[[link removed]]_

 

* Chess
[[link removed]]
* war
[[link removed]]
* Politics
[[link removed]]
* youth
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]