Still think your home is your castle? Think again!

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: December 19, 2024
------------------------------------------------------------


** Wrong House. Wrong Raid. Wrong Justice: SWAT Teams Run Amok 30 Years After Clinton Crime Bill Is Enacted
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, DC — In the 30 years since the Crime Bill fueled the militarization of police and the explosive growth of SWAT teams ([link removed]) , SWAT teams continue to terrorize innocent homeowners and then receive qualified immunity from the courts.

In an amicus brief in Jimerson v. Lewis ([link removed]) , The Rutherford Institute has called on the U.S. Supreme Court to hold a law enforcement official accountable for a raid gone awry after his SWAT team entered the wrong home, which belonged to a family of two parents and three young children, deploying a flashbang, breaking the front windows, and breaching the door. The SWAT team raided the wrong house after their commander failed to match the house’s street address number with a search warrant and ignored other noticeable differences.

“General incompetence, fatalities, and property damage have become unfortunate characteristics of botched SWAT team raids. In some cases, officers misread the address. In others, they simply barge into the wrong house or even the wrong building,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “All too often, botched SWAT raids have resulted in one tragedy after another with little consequences for law enforcement.”
JOIN THE FIGHT TO MAKE AMERICA FREE AGAIN: $250,000 MATCHING GIFT CAMPAIGN UNDERWAY ([link removed])

In March 2019, a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) officer contacted the SWAT team commander of the Waxahachie Police Department in Texas for assistance executing a search warrant that night on a suspected methamphetamine stash house with a street address number of 573. The DEA officer sent photos of the front of the target house. The commander took a nine-member SWAT team to the location with the DEA agents. The first house the SWAT team mistakenly approached was number 583, which the commander realized did not match the photos before entering. The commander saw that the house on the left appeared to have the same window layout as the photos and thought the number was 573 even though he could not clearly see it. But that house was actually number 593 and the home of Karen Jimerson, James Parks, and their three children. Unlike the photos of the target house, Jimerson’s home had no fence and had a wheelchair ramp.

Despite these differences and being unable to see the house number, officers ran to Jimerson’s house, deployed a flashbang, broke the front windows, and breached the door. The officers began a protective sweep and told two females to get on the ground before realizing it was the wrong house. Jimerson reported some pain in her side and was taken to the hospital.

An internal police department investigation determined that “reasonable and normal protocol was completely overlooked,” and the Chief of Police acknowledged that these kinds of mistakes should not happen. The SWAT team commander was suspended for two days without pay. The family filed a federal lawsuit, alleging a Fourth Amendment violation for the wrongful raid of their home. Although the district court would have let the case proceed, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that even though the officer’s efforts to identify the correct residence were “deficient,” the officer was entitled to qualified immunity from the lawsuit. In asking the Supreme Court to hear the case, Institute attorneys argue ([link removed]) that when police fail to follow the clear commands of a search warrant and instead invade an innocent third party’s home, those officers violate clearly established Fourth Amendment law and should not be entitled to
qualified immunity.

Erin Glenn Busby, Lisa R. Eskow, and Michael F. Sturley with the University of Texas School of Law Supreme Court Clinic advanced the arguments in the Jimerson v. Lewis amicus brief ([link removed]) .

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fwrong-house-wrong-raid-wrong-justice-swat-teams-run-amok-30-years-after-crime-bill Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fwrong-house-wrong-raid-wrong-justice-swat-teams-run-amok-30-years-after-crime-bill)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION TO THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2024 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])