Folks, I’m leading the fight to restore the President’s constitutional authority of impoundment. This battle is critically important, as impoundment will be central to reversing decades of disastrous spending habits.Â
So, what’s impoundment? And how can Congress ensure this tool is used to get our country back on track?
Impoundment is the President’s constitutional power, vested in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, to decline to spend the full amount of funds that Congress appropriates. In other words, the amount of funding that Congress approves presents a ceiling, not a floor.
For example, if Congress provides $20 million to fund a government project or program but the President can get the job done with half the amount, then the President shouldn’t be forced to spend more than the $10 million he needs.
This authority was utilized by Presidents for nearly 200 years for reasons ranging from efficiency to foreign affairs. In fact, every President from George Washington to Richard Nixon possessed this tool to cut wasteful spending or influence policy.
Yet in 1974, at the height of the Watergate scandal, Congress unnecessarily and unlawfully complicated the presidential power of impoundment with passage of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (ICA). The ICA is unconstitutional, as it violates the President’s Article II authority.
In the fifty years since, America’s national debt and Washington’s spending habits have soared out of control. But don’t just take my word for it: