[[link removed]]

SUNDAY SCIENCE: A ‘SECOND TREE OF LIFE’ COULD WREAK HAVOC,
SCIENTISTS WARN  
[[link removed]]


 

Carl Zimmer
December 12, 2024
New York Times
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Research on so-called mirror cells, which defy fundamental
properties of living organisms, should be prohibited as too dangerous,
biologists said. _

, Israel Vargas

 

On Thursday, 38 prominent biologists issued a dire warning: Within a
few decades, scientists will be able create a microbe that could cause
an unstoppable pandemic, devastating crop losses or the collapse of
entire ecosystems.

The scientists called for a ban on research that could lead to
synthesis of such an organism.

“The consequences could be globally disastrous,” said Jack W.
Szostak, a Nobel-prize-winning chemist at the University of Chicago
who helped write a 299-page technical report
[[link removed]] on the risks of the research.

In an accompanying commentary
[[link removed]] in the journal
Science, Dr. Szostak and his colleagues warned that an organism
created with the new technology could cause “extraordinarily
damaging consequences for the environment, agriculture, and human
well-being.”

To make such a microbe, scientists would have to build a cell that
defied one of the fundamental properties of life on Earth. The
molecules that serve as the building blocks of DNA and proteins
typically exist in one of two mirror-image forms. But living cells
rely on just one form.

 

Our DNA, for example, has a backbone made partly of sugar. While sugar
molecules can exist in left- and right-handed forms, DNA only uses the
right-handed molecules.

That’s the reason DNA’s double helix has a right-handed twist
[[link removed]]. Our
proteins, by contrast, are made of left-handed amino acids
[[link removed]].
This combination is found not just in humans, but in every species on
Earth.

Scientists are still debating
[[link removed]] how evolution
landed on this arrangement. In theory, a mirror cell — with
left-handed DNA and right-handed proteins — could carry out all the
biochemical reactions required to stay alive.

But as far as biologists can tell, mirror cells do not exist. At
least, not yet.

In recent decades, chemists have discovered how to make mirror
proteins. Researchers have welded together right-handed amino acids to
create mirror versions of natural proteins made by our own bodies.

Mirror proteins behave much like their natural counterparts, with one
important difference: They take much longer to break down. That’s
because the natural enzymes that normally degrade proteins have shapes
that are adapted for attacking left-handed proteins.

 

They cannot grip mirror proteins and cut them into fragments. Their
failure is akin to what happens if you try to twist open a lid from a
jar by turning it counterclockwise, only to discover that the threads
on the jar twist in the opposite direction.

Chemists are now trying to exploit mirror proteins, hoping they can be
used to create long-acting drugs for diseases ranging from H.I.V
[[link removed]].
to Alzheimer’s
[[link removed]].

In recent years, scientists have taken even bigger strides forward in
mirror biology. Ordinary cells make proteins
[[link removed]] by
reading a gene, making a copy of the gene’s sequence in an RNA
molecule, and shipping that RNA to a protein-making factory.

In 2022, Yuan Xu and Ting Zhu, two researchers at Westlake University
in China, created
[[link removed]] mirror enzymes
that can produce mirror RNA molecules by reading mirror genes. Similar
advances have raised the prospect that scientists could eventually
make all the parts required to build a mirror cell, perhaps in ten to
thirty years.

“The creation of mirror-image life is one of the ultimate
applications of synthetic mirror-image proteins,” Richard Payne, a
chemist at the University of Sydney in Australia and his
colleagues wrote last year
[[link removed]].

 

Several teams of scientists started taking further steps toward
mirror cells [[link removed]].

“It’s inherently incredibly cool,” said Kate Adamala, a
synthetic biologist at the University of Minnesota. “If we made a
mirror cell, we would have made a second tree of life.”

Aside from being cool, a mirror cell might also be medically valuable.
Scientists could program it to make bigger, more powerful mirror
proteins.

Kevin Esvelt, a biologist at MIT who studies the risks of
biotechnology
[[link removed]],
had vaguely wondered in the past if mirror cells might pose a risk. As
its synthesis became possible, he began to take that risk seriously.

He raised his concerns with biosecurity experts at Open Philanthropy,
which funds
[[link removed]] research
on potential threats to humanity such as pandemics and artificial
intelligence.

They brought together Dr. Adamala and other researchers working on
mirror cells, along with immunologists, plant biologists and
evolutionary biologists, to talk about the possible risks.

 

The discussion felt at first like science fiction to Jonathan Jones, a
plant biologist at the Sainsbury Laboratory in Norwich, England. “It
took me a while to take it seriously,” he said.

But he eventually recognized the potential for a planet-wide
catastrophe if a mirror cell escaped containment — either
accidentally released from a lab, or set free as a biological weapon.

The researchers then spent weeks plowing through the scientific
literature to see if they could falsify their hypothesis.

“We’ve all done our best to shoot it down,” said Vaughn Cooper,
an evolutionary biologist at the University of Pittsburgh. “And we
failed.”

The trouble with mirror cells is that they could probably evade most
of the barriers that keep ordinary organisms in check. To fight off
pathogens, for example, our bodies must first detect them with
molecular sensors.

 

Those sensors can only latch onto left-handed proteins or right-handed
DNA and RNA. A mirror cell that infected lab workers might spread
through their bodies without triggering any resistance from their
immune systems.

There wouldn’t be many organic molecules inside a human body for a
mirror cell to feed on. But Dr. Cooper and his colleagues suspect that
it might find enough to grow slowly. And if the immune system did not
detect the growing infection, it could spread without limit.

“Ultimately, that host will be overrun, and that will be fatal,”
Dr. Cooper said.

A victim of mirror cells would harbor a vast supply of the microbes,
which could spread to other people and start a pandemic. And it would
be one that medicine would be unlikely to stop.

An antibiotic typically works against ordinary microbes by locking
onto their proteins or its DNA. Such a drug would probably be useless
against a mirror cell, because the drug could not get a proper grip on
an essential molecule.

Drug developers might be able to create mirror antibiotics, but the
treatments might not be ready to use until a mirror pandemic was out
of control.

Humans wouldn’t be alone in their vulnerability. All animals rely on
similar pathogen sensors to switch on their immune systems, and they
would all likely fail to recognize mirror cells.

Plants have their own pathogen detectors, which would also fail.
“Essentially, all plants in the world would be unable to detect
these bacteria,” Dr. Jones warned.

Even if a mirror cell only escaped into a river or the soil, it could
wreak ecological havoc. Viruses would be unable to infect it. Amoebae
and other predators would find it indigestible.

Unchecked, mirror cells could come to dominate entire ecosystems.
“The impact on the food chain would be devastating,” said Deepa
Agashe, an evolutionary biologist at the National Center for
Biological Sciences at Bengaluru, formerly Bangalore, in India.

What makes a mirror cell even more dangerous is that it will be
mutating as it replicates, giving it the potential to evolve into an
even graver threat.

 

“Then all bets are off,” said Ruslan Medzhitov, an immunologist at
Yale University. “You can’t predict what will happen.”

As a result of these conversations, Dr. Adamala and her colleagues
decided to abandon their work on mirror cells. “We’re saying,
‘We’re not going to do it,’” she said.

How to prevent others from doing it is an open question, one that the
scientists plan to address at larger meetings in 2025. “It is
important that before the beast is in our face, we have a chance to
think through it collectively,” Dr. Agashe said.

“I share their view that the risks of creating mirror bacteria
cannot be justified by the relatively limited potential benefits, and
that mirror bacteria and other mirror organisms should not be
created,” said Filippa Lentzos, a biosecurity expert at King’s
College London who was not involved in the project.

Sharing these conclusions with the public and calling for a broad
discussion, she said, “is a role model of responsible science
today.”

_CARL ZIMMER [[link removed]] covers news
about science for The Times and writes the Origins column
[[link removed]]._

_Subscribe to the NEW YORK TIMES
[[link removed]]_

__

Oldest Human Genomes Reveal How a Small Group Burst Out of Africa
[[link removed]]
By Carl Zimmer
New York Times
DNA from European fossils dating back 45,000 years offers new clues to
how our species spread across the world.
December 12, 2024

* Science
[[link removed]]
* biology
[[link removed]]
* cells
[[link removed]]
* DNA
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]